Select Committee on Trade and Industry Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 260-279)

INDO BRITISH PARTNERSHIP NETWORK

28 FEBRUARY 2006

  Q260  Rob Marris: Apart from you, it does look fairly service industry to me; there is nothing wrong with the service industry but that is only one part of the equation, is it not, with Marks & Spencer as retail, for example? That is why I am probing you about what appears to be an imbalance.

  Mr Bilimoria: There are other manufacturers there as well on the list; of course, we have the CBI represented at the table as well, who represent several British manufacturers.

  Q261  Mr Binley: I want to talk about imbalance too, but I am interested particularly in what I see as the imbalance in investment between the two countries and the profitability of that investment and where it is reinvested. I believe we have got a sizeable imbalance there, a net deficit, from the UK's point of view, with quite a lot of profit made in the UK going back to India and not being reinvested here. Can you tell me how your organisation might help to rebalance that imbalance?

  Dr Vyakarnam: I think all businesses, anywhere in the world, would want to take some part of its profit back to its founding business, I would imagine. Presumably, that is what you are referring to, the repatriation of profits.

  Q262  Mr Binley: In terms of FDI, there is a net imbalance, in terms of investment, in those terms, because most of the profit made by Indian companies from investment in the UK goes back to India. If you added SMEs to that, that figure would be sizeably increased, actually. I just wonder what you could do to ensure that there was further investment by Indian companies in the UK to redress that balance?

  Mr Bilimoria: My view is that we have got to continue, in Britain, being a completely open economy, and that means open to investment from anywhere, any country. As long as they are bringing investment into Britain they are creating employment over here, they are creating opportunities over here and we have unrestricted money flows going out of Britain. That free market is one of our greatest strengths, that is what makes the City of London such a phenomenally successful place and one of the best places in the world to have business headquarters. If we can encourage Indian companies, which increasingly are going global, at the moment there are no truly giant global Indian companies, soon there will be, and Tata will be a giant global company soon, I am sure, but in the scale of the giant global companies the Indian companies are emerging and within the next 10 years there will be giant global Indian companies. In the same way as, for example, South African Breweries moved their global business headquarters to London and took a London listing on the London Stock Exchange and then, in five years, from being the biggest brewery in Africa and South Africa, today they are the second-largest brewer in the world, headquartered in London, listed on the London Stock Exchange, I would hope that, in the future, there will be several Indian companies which use London more and more as their global base and that can be only a good thing for Britain.

  Q263  Mr Binley: We are seeing already an imbalance internationally, in terms of people investing in this country and our investments abroad, and that is raising some concern. I just wonder whether the area we are talking about would not help in that respect and keep that concept of freedom alive over the coming 40 or 50 years, because my concern is that there could well be a move to protectionism in this respect and that would be harmful to all that you wanted to do.

  Dr Vyakarnam: I would like to check the figures at some stage, but I believe that FDI from India into the UK exceeds—

  Q264  Mr Binley: I can tell you: it is minus £18 million without SMEs, which is about 7% ingoing.

  Dr Vyakarnam: The investment coming in here presumably is creating jobs, paying taxes, and you see that as part of investment. The repatriation of profits I think is a normal matter for both countries.

  Mr Binley: Reinvestment?

  Q265  Chairman: The suggestion is that the worry we have is that when Britons invest in India they tend to reinvest their profits and grow the business, but the figures suggest that Indian investment here is treated as a cash-cow and the money is sent home, and there seems to be a different approach; that is what the figures seem to indicate. Is that a fair analysis?

  Mr Bilimoria: For example, Tata bought Tetley in 2000, and to my knowledge both profits and market share have increased. To me, the priority is Britain being an open market and welcoming in investment, and if there is repatriation of profits, well, British companies would want to repatriate profits when investing in India, should we wish to do so. Of course there will be an element of reinvestment. If an Indian market is growing, in my case we predict that if the beer market in India follows China it will grow by between 25 to 30 times in the next 25 years, in which case, we will be reinvesting all the time in a growing market.

  Q266  Mr Binley: Exactly the point I am making, because if you are looking at China and India having 60% of global trade by 2050 then the problems that creates for our home marketplace, with unemployment, and so forth, are sizeable and considerable. That is why we need a little bit more understanding and respect, would you not agree?

  Mr Bilimoria: In terms of looking ahead, the point that you have made, another advantage that we have is that, as Chairman of the Indo British Partnership Network, I am also a member of the Asia Task Force, also a member of the UK-India Round Table, both of which are forward-looking and looking at the challenges and the opportunities in both countries, looking ahead, preparing reports, forecasts of where India and Britain will be in 2020, for example. Also, we are linked into the London-Delhi Round Table that meets over here and I am linked into the Asian Business Association over here; so we are aware of this forward-looking approach.

  Q267  Mr Binley: You are a very high-profile guy, with all those connections; you are going to take this on board and see what you might be able to do about it?

  Mr Bilimoria: Certainly we will look at it.

  Mr Binley: I am delighted. Thank you.

  Q268  Mr Weir: We heard in evidence that Tata Consultancy Services is to invest in a joint venture with the Pearl Group in Peterborough. I just wonder, do you see this type of model of cooperation in this joint venture as the future for investment by Indian companies in the UK?

  Dr Vyakarnam: I think, for the larger companies, it is a way forward, yes, in particular sectors. I would imagine that for ICT, hi-tech and the biotech industries it would be a good model, where collaborations, joint ventures, and so on, are pretty normal practice among large companies on a global basis.

  Mr Bilimoria: There are other examples. Mahindra and Mahindra have bought Stokes. Tata, of course, are hoping to set up a development centre near Coventry. Bharat Forge, one of the largest in its sector in the world, has bought a Scottish business. There is a lot of activity and there is a lot of investment coming from India, a lot of it to date has been in the IT sector but now it is in manufacturing as well, which I think is good.

  Q269  Mr Weir: Do those tend to set up joint ventures when they go into manufacturing as well? What I am getting at is, the investment is coming in, is the future going to be joint ventures with UK-based companies or are Indian companies going to set up their own, from scratch, if you like, investment in the UK?

  Mr Bilimoria: My experience is, I have seen a variety, I have seen acquisitions, I have seen joint ventures. I have seen one Indian company which is part-manufacturing some of the product, some of which was imported from Europe into India, sending it to the UK to be finished, so using the UK not only to finish the product but also using the UK as a sales and marketing centre for that product worldwide, particularly into Europe. There is a variety of ways in which this can happen.

  Q270  Mr Weir: What about the reverse, for UK companies wanting to invest in India; is joint venture the way forward for them, rather than trying to break the Indian market, if you like, on their own?

  Mr Bilimoria: I think one has got to keep an open mind. There are ways of going in, of a greenfield site, of licensing, of joint venturing, of acquiring, and I think one has got to keep all of the opportunities open.

  Q271  Mrs Curtis-Thomas: My question relates to information deficit. We have already taken quite a lot of evidence, particularly from the UKTI, about information deficit in the UK, and would you identify this as a major or a minor or significant factor in UK-India trade and what steps have you taken to address this issue?

  Dr Vyakarnam: I think there is an information deficit and the issue of perceptions, therefore, looms large, and sometimes is driven by the press's perception of what they think are the realities, and so you get from lack of information to misinformation on some occasions about the substantive issues. There is information at a number of different levels that is required. There is a sort of general awareness of the possibilities, of the opportunities and the realities, and so forth, and then there is the harder information that is required on the ground. Sort of information provided by the staff at the BusinessLinks, working with the small businesses, actually the hand-holding services, taking advantage of UKTI's OMIS, to which Mr Bilimoria referred earlier. At that level too, work needs to be done to scale up the operation, to scale up the take-up of opportunity that exists. There is an information deficit at a number of different levels, for sure.

  Q272  Mrs Curtis-Thomas: One of the things I find immensely interesting is the number of different websites that are available, providing different bits of information. I logged on and said "Do business in India". I do not know what sorts of word plans you put in which acknowledge the fact that somebody literally can offer standing-start, but the responses were very different and not what I was looking for. Are you happy with the way that the web presents opportunities in India and do you sense that you have a role, or rather a sort of coordinating role, to bring to that, and, if it is not you, who should be doing that?

  Mr Bilimoria: I think that this is one of the practical ways in which the Indo British Partnership Network has found, already in its early days, that it is becoming a first stop portal, gateway, to doing business with India. From there we are linked into a variety of organisations, of course UKTI but also to the Indian High Commission and to the Indian Government departments and to the British High Commission in India and to various other organisations and sector expertise. If there is this one-stop shop from which you can be directed, that role is starting to emerge already and we are getting huge numbers of hits on our website, in the very early days, without having millions of pounds worth of marketing budget to make people aware of the Indo British Partnership Network.

  Dr Vyakarnam: Personally I got interested in that question and registered a website called `thinkindia.co.uk' done on a bootstrapping basis and a couple of students, and so forth, and we have got a portal for news and information which is linked into the IBPN website and we are trying to promote that and it is a long slog. I think there is a role to be played by the Indian High Commission here as well, because it is not just Britain's job to promote trade with India, I think, also, equally, it is Indian Government's role to promote. I think, to some extent, the communication gap is that sometimes Indian business, and sometimes Indian Government, does not present its own PR effectively enough to the British public.

  Q273  Mrs Curtis-Thomas: My observation is, you may be getting a significant number of hits, but whether or not you have got an effective website is another matter entirely. If you start afresh, you are presuming that the effectiveness of each contact has a summation which leads the individual to making investment in India and I do not see that happening, because I think you will run into brick walls, actually. Website direction is one thing; hyperlinking to sites, unless it is a fruitful event, then it is not going to lead you to where you want to go, which is investment.

  Mr Bilimoria: Part of our plan, in building the website, is to make it more and more proactive. Because people join on a sector basis, when they join they declare which sector their expertise is in or their business is in, then every time there is a sector report produced or there is a delegation which is of interest to that particular individual, or that sector, we can notify them of it proactively. The more proactive we can be and develop the site to be then we are going to be more and more a catalyst to encourage this trade and business investment.

  Q274  Rob Marris: One of the things which will help UK companies investing in India, of course, is local knowledge, and one of the ways to acquire that is through partnership working. UK companies also have, or should have, a corporate social responsibility agenda, and I would hope that Cobra Beer does as well. A particular problem in India, which by and large is not existing in the UK, except to a very small extent, is casteism. What is the IBPN doing to educate its members who are investing in India to take the issue of casteism, and the issue of Dalit in particular, seriously so that the abhorrent discrimination which exists currently in India, and in other countries, on the basis of caste is not bought into by UK companies investing in India? In fact, that they oppose it, in line with the Constitution of India, written by Dr Ambedkar, with whom you will be familiar, and there are now the Ambedkar Principles produced by the Dalit Solidarity Network? What are you doing about that, in your own company and in IBPN?

  Dr Vyakarnam: It is an interesting question about what the role of IBPN would be with injustices in other parts of the world; this is quite a curious question, actually. I will let Karan answer for Cobra Beer, but as far as IBPN is concerned it has been in existence for about a year now, the Board composition. I think you make an extremely useful contribution and I think it should be raised at the next Board meeting as an issue for companies, members of IBPN, to take to their own businesses, but I do not know that, as a Board member of IBPN, I would wish to dictate other companies' policies.

  Q275  Rob Marris: What I am asking is whether you are encouraging your members to comply with the Constitution of India, which sadly is often overlooked within India in this respect, whether you are actively encouraging them to do so, as I think you should be?

  Mr Bilimoria: I think the Indian Government, for years now, has gone and is going to great, great lengths to eradicate all discrimination, of any sort. If what you are suggesting is that we should make our members even more aware of this then certainly we will make them even more aware of it. It is something that the Government has been very, very active in promoting and is promoting strongly in the whole of Indian society.

  Q276  Rob Marris: You manufacture in India, do you not, or have I misunderstood that, with Cobra Beer?

  Mr Bilimoria: Yes.

  Q277  Rob Marris: Do you monitor the proportion of your workforce which is Dalit?

  Mr Bilimoria: We have a licensing agreement with a brewery over there, and where corporate social responsibility is concerned, where the environment is concerned, we monitor that very carefully. I can give you one small example where the brewery is located in an agricultural area, surrounded by fields, and the brewery started buying the husk from the mustard harvest to use to generate power for the brewery, so actually using a natural source and providing extra income for the farmers. The effluent from the brewery is treated and then is used by the local farmers as extra water and irrigation; so we are very aware of corporate social responsibility, and personally I always encourage it at every opportunity I get.

  Q278  Rob Marris: Could you let us have a note perhaps on the proportion of Dalit that you employ, or the brewery employs?

  Mr Bilimoria: I could ask them.

  Rob Marris: Thank you.

  Q279  Chairman: The questions that Rob has been asking do highlight one interesting question, which is how different is India from the commercial environment of Europe or the United States of America? We have heard conflicting evidence on that. One said that actually it is not that different and, viewed from India, doing business in the UK looks pretty difficult. You only have to try putting up a garden shed in your back garden to know how difficult it is to get anything done in the UK. How different is India and how difficult is it? You have got experience of doing business in both countries; is it more difficult, or is it just different? Is it different or difficult?

  Mr Bilimoria: In many ways, it is very similar. For example, the basic business environment is similar, the legal system is very similar, and actually India has a very good rule of law. Yes, there are issues sometimes of the time it takes for the legal process to take place, but the basic law actually is very good, even when it comes to intellectual property, which perception-wise seems to be a concern. There is actually very good intellectual property law in India; yes, enforcement and the time it takes can be an issue. There is a free press in India, and a very vibrant press; there are more television news channels in India, I think, than in any other country in the world, and the most important thing is that it is a free press. In many ways, the business environment is similar, the financial markets are very similar, the stock exchanges. On the other hand, it does help to have local knowledge, local expertise and that is where it helps to have good advisers, and that is where UKTI, the British High Commission in India, on the ground, with its locally-employed staff, can be of great benefit to British businesses, particularly when they are operating in India for the first time, to point them in the right direction and guide them in the initial days. Then I think very quickly companies find their feet and find it a good country to operate in, from a business point of view.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 27 July 2006