Our inquiry
3. At the beginning of March we announced our intention
to conduct an inquiry into the design of the National Pension
Savings Scheme and the role of financial services regulation.
We indicated that we would particularly be concerned with exploring
factors affecting the costs of any pension measures arising from
the proposals in the Second Report of the Pensions Commission
for a National Pension Savings Scheme, the regulation of such
measures, the roles of the Financial Services Authority and the
Treasury, and lessons from Stakeholder pensions. We decided to
conduct a short, focused inquiry with a view to reporting to the
House of Commons prior to the publication of the Pensions White
Paper, which is expected by the end of May.[7]
We heard oral evidence from Which?, Mr Ned Cazalet of Cazalet
Consulting, the Investment Management Association (IMA), the Association
of British Insurers (ABI), the National Association of Pension
Funds (NAPF), the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and Lord
Turner. We also received a range of written evidence which will
be published alongside the oral evidence in Volume II of this
Report.[8] We are grateful
to all those who assisted the Committee in the course of this
inquiry.
4. The reports of the Pensions Commission cover a
very broad canvas. Many of the issues relating to pensions reform
are being examined in a wide-ranging inquiry by the Work and Pensions
Committee of the House of Commons.[9]
Our own inquiry has concentrated on the issues surrounding the
National Pension Savings Scheme and the other models that have
been proposed for further private pension provision, including
issues of cost and regulation. We have not sought to take evidence
on the costs and merits of particular policy measures relating
to pensionable age, the level of Basic State Pension and the operation
of Pension Credit. We do examine the interaction between the various
proposals for further private pension provision and possible future
trends in relation to public pension provision.
1