Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 200-203)

MS KAREN DUNNELL, MR DENNIS ROBERTS AND MR MIKE HUGHES

7 JUNE 2006

  Q200  Chairman: The board appointments will be made by the minister?

  Mr Roberts: Indeed. At the top level there is always a need for a minister to deal with Parliament about the legislation under which any organisation works. What is then intended, for the non-ministerial department in the consultation document, is that ministers would appoint the chair of the governing board and the chief executive, ie the chief statistician or the national statistician. The minister would appoint those two persons.

  Q201  Chairman: But the perception will still be, therefore, that you are reporting, or accountable, or funded by the Treasury. I am asking Karen Dunnell this question. Why should you not, as others have argued, be accountable now to a more independent body like the Cabinet Office, for example? Is there not an issue that you are going to be accountable to the very body that funds you?

  Ms Dunnell: I think, at the end of the day, we have to accept that national statistics, in whatever form and certainly in the form that is proposed in the consultation document, will have to be funded, and eventually, of course, funded by the Treasury. We do not want to get into a situation where we are asked to kind of recoup the cost of the system. So, at the end of the day, that is where the money comes from. I think there have been discussions about whether the Cabinet Office is more appropriate. I myself do not think it matters particularly. What really matters is the setting up of this board and making that a really effective independent body, because I think that we will in a sense, as the office and the statistical system, be seen to be reporting to that board and, through that board, to yourselves in Parliament, and I think that is what we have to get to happen. Eventually, of course, the money is going to come from the Treasury.

  Q202  Chairman: You see the point I am making. The criticism, presumably, will be what is the difference between the present system? The ONS appointed and funded by the Treasury; the new board appointed and funded by the Treasury?

  Ms Dunnell: Yes, except that the board will be appointed in the usual publicly acceptable way and it will have quite a wide range, I expect, of non-executive members on it, and I know from discussions that this is the Chancellor's opportunity that he has taken now to make a big step towards independence, and I am sure that he will find the people, chose the people in the right way, but it is up to all of us, either on the board or in the statistical system, to emphasise all the time the independence of what we do.

  Q203  Chairman: Thank you very much.

  Ms Dunnell: Thank you.

  Chairman: We will pursue that with the Minister next week. Thank you for your attendance today.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 26 July 2006