Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


APPENDIX

  A Ballymena client received a letter on 22 December 2005 dated 5 October 2005 regarding a non-recoverable overpayment. The client disputed the case in July and this was not resolved until December. This process involved the burau having to contact HMRC on nine separate occasions.

  A Ballymena client had received an overpayment due to cohabiting yet claiming as a single person. She arranged to pay back the overpayment at £50 per month. The client then received further letters giving different overpayment amounts and asking her to pay these back even though she had set up a repayment arrangement. In addition to this HMRC had wrongly input her income thus making the overpayment higher than it should have been. The client was also entitled to the disability premium and this was taken off her original award for no reason.

  A Coleraine client received and overpayment for £1,000 due to an element of childcare that she informed HMRC that she was no longer entitled to. Her award was adjusted and five months later HMRC added this onto her award in April and the client did not realise as she was not informed of this.

  A Newry couple had an overpayment of £1,800 from tax year 2003-04. They received 16 different award notices in one year and no explanation of how the overpayment arose. The client's have been unable to ascertain how and why the overpayment has arisen despite contacting HMRC several times. The bureau has to use the client's P60 in an attempt to calculate the exact amount of tax credits they should have received with a view to challenging the decision.

  A Rathcoole client called to the bureau on 27 January. She had lodged her dispute form in November and has received no further information on this and just keeps getting letters stating that her award has been terminated as she has an overpayment. The bureau contacted HMRC and was told that computer errors have caused this. The client was advised to ignore any further letters until her overpayment was investigated. The client had to make a fresh claim as she had no tax credits.

  A Ballymena client works 31 hours per week, earning approximately £13,000 per annum. The client's husband has been in receipt of Incapacity Benefit for five years. The client has one dependant child aged 12. The client brought in all the award notices in relation to CTC/WTC showing a total WTC overpayment of £3,244.98. The client had already been advised the overpayment arose in part of the disability element being paid in error, but the client has never received a full explanation from HMRC that she can understand. The client states that she never told HMRC that her husband was receiving DLA and the client has already requested a copy of her original claim form be sent to her.

  A Ballymena client received a letter from HMRC saying recovery of the overpayment is being suspended while the dispute is ongoing and no decision has yet been made. There is not date on this letter, but it was received on 14 November 2005. The client then received a letter from HMRC saying the dispute was being looked into and recovery suspended, but HMRC told the CAB adviser over the telephone that the overpayment has already been written off. Conflicting information coming from HMRC which is confusing to the client and the adviser.

February 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 June 2006