Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the National Audit Office

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Treasury Sub Committee announced on 26 October 2005 that it is undertaking an inquiry into the administration of Tax Credits. This will include an examination of HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) recovery of overpayments of Tax Credits and the difficulties encountered in administering the payments system.

  2.  In recent years, the Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG) has reported annually on Tax Credits as part of his Standard Report on the Accounts of the Inland Revenue. The purpose of this Memorandum is to summarise the National Audit Office's (NAO) recent work on Tax Credits that is relevant to the Committee's inquiry. It is based on the C&AG's Standard Reports for 2003, 2004 and 2005, which have examined HMRC's administration of Tax Credits up to 31 March 2005 including the overpayments. The main conclusions are set out in paragraphs 4 to 8.

  3.  There have been a number of recent developments on Tax Credits and the NAO will be considering these in the context of the C&AG's Standard Report for 2006, which is due for publication in July 2006.

CONCLUSIONS

  4.  The design of the new Tax Credits system necessarily results in overpayments. The scale of overpayments is however higher than the Department anticipated when the schemes were designed. (paragraphs 9 and 12)

  5.  To alleviate hardship, the Department allows claimants to make repayments over several years. The full recovery of overpayments from 2003-04 is expected to take at least five years. (paragraph 16)

  6.  Although overpayments inevitably occur due to the design of the scheme, there have been further unforeseen overpayments, including those arising from software errors. (paragraph 10)

  7.  The Department has written off some £95 million of overpayments and, in preparing its Trust Statement for 2004-05, made a provision of £961 million, representing overpayments which, in its view, would eventually also be written off. (paragraphs 14 and 15)

  8.  The Department's interim findings of an investigation into the levels of claimant error and fraud in 2003-04 indicated that it overpaid 3.4% by value (£460 million). The final results are likely to show an increase in these figures. The C&AG qualified his opinion on the Department's Trust Statement accounts for 2003-04 and 2004-05 because of an unacceptably high level of error and fraud. (paragraphs 23 and 25)

OVERPAYMENTS

Inherent overpayments

  9.  The design of the new Tax Credits system necessarily results in overpayments. A Tax Credit award is provisionally based on a family's income and circumstances from the preceding tax year. The award is finalised after the end of the tax year once income and circumstances are known for certain. The final award will be lower than the provisional award where incomes increase, although the first £2,500 of any income increase is disregarded. The Department estimates that the final entitlement to Tax Credits would have been £800 million lower without the £2,500 disregard.

Other causes of overpayments

  10.  Although the design of the new Tax Credits necessarily results in overpayments, there have also been unforeseen overpayments. For example, software errors resulted in overpayments of £184 million in 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Department is continuing to investigate the reasons for further incorrect payments caused by system miscalculations. Departmental error can also lead to many overpayments.

Total overpayments and recovery

  11.  The Department identified that some £2.2 billion was overpaid in 2003-04, affecting some 1.9 million families. The Department does not yet know the level of overpayments for 2004-05 awards, but estimates that these are likely to be similar to those for 2003-04.

  12.  The scale of overpayments is higher than anticipated when the schemes were designed. The Government expected one million awards to be reassessed as a result of rises in income in the first year of Tax Credits, falling to around 750,000 in subsequent years. The Department explained that this was because the extent of income rises in excess of the £2,500 threshold was greater than anticipated and that many families overestimate how much their income has fallen or is likely to fall when notifying the Department of a change in circumstances.

  13.  Figure One shows the distribution of these underpayments and overpayments for 2003-04. These are based on the department's initial figures for overpayments of £1.9 billion.

  Tax Credit awards can be backdated and subsequent payments made in 2004-05 relating to 2003-04 brought the total overpayments for the year to £2.2 billion.

Figure One

FINALISED 2003-04 AWARDS UNDERPAID OR OVERPAID AT 5 APRIL 2004


Banding
Underpayment
Overpayment

Awards (000s)
£m
awards
£m
£10 to £50
82
2
134
4
£50 to £100
81
6
121
9
£100 to £200
111
16
193
28
£200 to £500
170
56
414
141
£500 to £1,000
124
88
388
280
£1,000 to £2,000
92
129
347
493
£2,000 to £5,000
47
136
243
725
£5,000 and above
5
29
40
252
Total
713
464
1,879
1,931


Source: HMRC.

  14.  Some £391 million overpayments were recovered in 2004-05 either directly from claimants or through adjustments to Tax Credit payments later in the year. The Department also wrote off some £95 million of overpayments. Looking forward, some overpayments that the Department is currently seeking to recover might become irrecoverable because claimants successfully contended that they could not repay because of hardship, or because the Department had difficulty in tracing claimants no longer entitled to receive Tax Credits.

  15.  In preparing its Trust Statement for 2004-05, the Department had to form a view on what further tax credit debt would eventually have to be remitted or written off. The Department concluded that a total provision of £961 million (£481 million for each of 2003-04 and 2004-05) was appropriate.

  16.  The Department does not ask claimants to pay off overpayments in a lump sum if they are continuing to receive Tax Credit payments. To alleviate hardship, the Department allows claimants to make repayments over several years. The full recovery of the remaining £1.3 billion overpayments from 2003-04 is expected to take at least five years as shown in Figure Two.

Figure Two

EXPECTED YEAR OF RECOVERY OF 2003-04 AWARD OVERPAYMENTS OUTSTANDING AT APRIL 2005


Expected year of recovery:
£bn

2005-06
0.5
2006-07
0.4
2007-08
0.1
2008-09
0.1
Later
0.2
Total overpayment for recovery
1.3

Source: HMRC.

  17.  Overpayments for 2004-05 are likely to be similar to 2003-04. The Department therefore expects the amounts needing to be recovered to grow, as a result of overpayments for further cycles.

  18.  In 2004-05 the Department received 217,000 disputes against recovery of overpayments. It struggled to manage this level of work and introduced new streamlined procedures from April 2005 for dealing with "official error relief", where an overpayment is due to a mistake by the Department and if it was reasonable for the claimant to think that the award was right. These procedures were likely to be more generous to claimants in many situations and at that time the Department estimated that the new procedures were likely to result in a net loss of £46.5 million.

  19.  The recovery of overpayments was automated and the Tax Credit computer system could not stop the recovery while staff considered hardship cases. We understand that the Department has subsequently developed a manual workaround to stop this automatic recovery from November 2005. It intends to have a computer based solution in place by the end of 2006.

  20.  The Department's Code of Practice on Tax Credits overpayments (COP26) is being reviewed as part of the measures that the PMG has asked the Department to take forward.

CHANGES ANNOUNCED IN THE DECEMBER 2005 PRE-BUDGET REPORT

  21.  A number of important changes were announced in the December 2005 Pre-Budget Report. These are designed to provide applicants with more certainty as to their award and will reduce the level of overpayments. The main changes were:

    —    From 2006-07, the Department will disregard increases in income between one year and the next of up to £25,000 (previously £2,500).

    —    From November 2006, claimants will be required to report, within three months, any changes in their circumstances which will reduce their level of entitlement. This limit will be reduced to one month in April 2007.

    —    From November 2006, recovery of overpayments during the year of award will be at the same rate as recoveries made after that year.

    —    From April 2007, lump sum back payments will no longer be made when awards are increased following an in-year reduction in estimated income.

    —    From August 2006, the renewal deadline will be advanced by one month.

    —    From 2007-08, provisional payments will be based on more up to date family income.

ADMINISTRATION OF THE PAYMENTS SYSTEMS

  22.  This section looks at a number of issues relevant to the administration of the payments system. These are:

    —    Error and Fraud;

    —    Computer problems on the introduction of tax credits;

    —    Software errors;

    —    Controls over payments;

    —    Tax Credits targets; and

    —    Complaints.

Error and fraud

  23.  The C&AG qualified his opinion on the Inland Revenue Trust Statement Accounts for 2003-04 and 2004-05 because of an unacceptably high level of applicant error and fraud.

  24.  A Departmental exercise in 2000-01 identified that they had overpaid some 10-14% by value of the former tax credits because of claimant error and fraud. In December 2003 told the Committee of Public Accounts that it envisaged that error rates would be halved with the introduction of the new Tax Credits.

  25.  The Department's work to identify the level of error and fraud in 2003-04 awards is not due to be completed until Spring 2006. In July 2005, it announced interim findings which indicated that it overpaid 3.4% by value (£460 million) because of claimant error and fraud. These results are subject to a wide margin of error as they based on an initial sample and are likely to involve the more compliant cases. The final results are likely to show an increase in the proportion of cases involving claimant error and fraud.

  26.  Tax Credits have been targeted by organised criminals and the Department closed the Tax Credit internet facility on 2 December because of attempts to defraud the system. A recent estimate by the Department shows losses to the exchequer of some £15 million due to organised fraud. This figure relates to the losses to date in some 25 cases of significant organised fraud, defined as those involving more than £25,000. As a result of the further work on tackling organised fraud, the Department believes that the £15 million figure will increase, but it is too early to give a firm estimate at the moment.

  27.  The Department has acknowledged that better checks could have been made where claimants notify them of changes of circumstances which affect their award. Measures designed to improve compliance were announced in the Pre-Budget Report in December 2005.

Computer Problems on the introduction on tax credits

  28.  The administration of payments suffered from the serious problems with the computer systems during the introduction of Tax Credits in April 2003. These both delayed the processing of claims and led to incorrect payments being made. These problems continued to have ramifications in 2004-05.

  29.  On 22 November 2005 the Department announced a settlement of £71.25 million had been agreed with EDS for the problems experienced with these systems.

Software errors

  30.  Although the design of the new Tax Credits necessarily results in overpayments, there have also been overpayments resulting from software errors. These resulted in overpayments of £184 million in 2003-04 and 2004-05.

  31.  The Department is continuing to investigate the reasons for other incorrect payments caused by system miscalculations.

Controls over payments

  32.  The C&AG's Standard Report has also drawn attention to various aspects of HMRC's controls over Tax Credits payments, including:

    —    controls to ensure that only authorised payments are actually made;

    —    the reconciliation of the Department's records of payments made with those paid by its Bank; and

    —    the validity of Tax Credit payments made by employers.

  33.  Since the introduction of Tax Credits in April 2003, the Department has not been able to perform the important control of a daily reconciliation of payments authorised with payments made. Checks are instead carried out in bulk some time after payments have been made. This means that some incorrect payments to claimants are not recognised promptly and that Department staff may not have accurate information when dealing with queries. The Department plans to introduce the fully automated system in the second half of 2005-06

  34.  The Department has had difficulties in reconciling its own record of payments with those cleared through the banks. This is complicated by the need to account for some 400,000 payments in respect of 2003-04 and 2004-05, which had not been allocated to claimants' accounts at the end of 2004-05.

  35.  Some tax credits are paid directly by employers. The Department gains assurance over these payments by reconciling a sample of amounts reported as paid by employers to the Departmental record of awards. The 2003-04 exercise resulted in a reconciliation rate of 78.9%. This indicated that of the £2 billion paid via employers, there was a likely net overpayment of £20 million. The Department believed these results to be reasonable given that this was the first such reconciliation exercise and that this was the first year employers had operated the new scheme. Payment via employers is being withdrawn between November 2005 and April 2006 and replaced by direct payments to the claimants.

Tax credits targets

  36.  The Department checks how accurately it processes information received from claimants. In 2004-05 the accuracy of processing exceeded the 90% target, improving from 78.6% in 2003-04 to 96.5%. The significant improvement reflects continuing efforts by the Department to identify reasons for inaccuracy and to introduce new procedures to prevent error.

  37.  The Department's research indicated that the inaccuracy was mainly due to:

    —    inputting of income from wrong financial year;

    —    inputting of incorrect income; and/or

    —    omission of a partner's income, when the claimant notified a change in their own income.

Complaints

  38.  The Department's Tax Credit Office has received around 51,000 complaints in 2004-05 and has had difficulties managing this workload. Consequently, this required an increase in staff numbers from around 200 in April 2004 to a peak of around 400 in April 2005.

  39.  The Department paid compensation to complainants in accordance with its published Code of Practice 1, Putting things right, for the costs they incurred as a direct result of the Department's mistakes or delays and for the worry and distress caused. Payments for worry and distress are not intended to put a value on the upset caused but acknowledge that the Department was responsible. In 2004-05 it made 20,000 compensation payments, totalling £1.24 million.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 June 2006