Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Letter from HM Revenue and Customs to Mr Mike Brewer, Institute for Fiscal Studies, provided to the Treasury Sub-Committee by Mr Brewer

  Dear Mr Brewer,

FOI REQUEST RELATING TO "TAX CREDIT PACKAGE" ANNOUNCED IN PBR 2005

  I am writing in connection with the request you made on 9 December 2005 under the Freedom of Information Act, about the tax credit measures announced in PBR 2005.

QUESTION

  1.  What information does HMRC hold about the likely costs of the PBR package in 2009-10 and 2010-11?

  2.  What information does HMRC hold about the likely cost in 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 of increasing the earnings disregard in tax credits from £2,500 to £25,000?

  3.  What information does HMRC hold about the implications of the PBR package on HMRC's costs of administering tax credits in 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09?

ANSWER

  1.  The estimated cost of the PBR 2005 tax credit package in 2009-10 and 2010-11 is -£50 million and -£150 million respectively.

  2.  The increase in the disregard from £2,500 to £25,000 from April 2006 is part of a package of measures announced in the 2005 Pre-Budget Report that is expected to have the following Exchequer effect: -£100 million in 2006-07, +£200 million 2007-08 and +£50 million in 2008-09 as set out in table 1.2 of the 2005 Pre-Budget Report.

  The effect of the changes to the tax credit system depends on the sources of overpayments of which income rises above the disregard is only one. However, there is only limited information available on the sources of overpayments as the only year for which HMRC has complete data is 2003-04. This is not a typical year, and one of the reasons for that is that the initial income information used in calculating awards was two years old rather than one year old as it is for all future years.

  The lack of representative data makes costing the individual elements of the package difficult. Moreover, there are uncertainties around the behavioural response to the measures and importantly significant interactions between the different elements of the package. While the overall cost of the package is not affected by the order with which the changes are modelled, the costs of the individual elements of the package are affected. It is therefore very difficult to produce an accurate disaggregation of the overall costs.

  Taking these factors together, while the overall Exchequer effect of these reforms as a whole can be modelled with sufficient certainty, it is not possible to produce reliable estimates of the cost of the individual elements on their own.

  However, you have requested information that HMRC holds about the likely cost in 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 of increasing the earnings disregard in tax credits from £2,500 to £25,000. The information which does exist consists of calculations and estimates provided in the course of consideration of policy options, and we consider it to be exempt from disclosure under section 35 of the FOIA. Section 35 of the Act exempts information if it "relates to the formulation or development of Government policy".

  In applying this exemption we have had to balance the public interest in withholding the information against the public interest in disclosing the information. In this case we have concluded that the public interest in withholding the information outweighs the public interest in disclosure. In order to ensure that the Government's policy decisions are of the highest quality, it is vital that PBR and Budget costings are based on sound advice reflecting full and frank discussion and analysis. We consider that disclosure of the information you have requested would in future impact on the ability of officials/experts in providing sufficiently free and frank advice.

  3.  The department does not hold information that separately identifies the effect of the PBR package on HMRC's costs of administering tax credits.

16 January 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 6 June 2006