Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 290-299)

MS BERNIE MORGAN, MS SARAH MCGEEHAN, MR ANDREW BAKER AND MR SIMON FROST

28 FEBRUARY 2006

  Q290 Chairman: Good morning. Welcome to this second part of our inquiry. Could I ask you to introduce yourselves for the shorthand writers, please.

  Mr Frost: My name is Simon Frost. I am Managing Director of South Coast Money Line.

  Ms Morgan: I am Bernie Morgan, Chief Executive of the Community Development Finance Association.

  Ms McGeehan: I am Sarah McGeehan, and I am Bernie's deputy at CDFA.

  Mr Baker: My name is Andrew Baker and I am Chief Executive of Derbyloans.

  Q291 Chairman: What role can CDFIs play in promoting financial inclusion by increasing the availability of affordable credit?

  Ms Morgan: Their mission is to work with people currently excluded from mainstream banking services, it is to find those people, work with them, and then move them back on to the mainstream banking services. They exist to promote financial inclusion and they have a real role in that. Some of them specialise in personal finance and some in enterprise finance, and the two members we have with us today both represent those.

  Q292  Chairman: Tell us about yourself as a CDFI.

  Ms Morgan: We are the trade association for the CDFIs.

  Q293  Chairman: Where does the money come from?

  Ms Morgan: Currently, we are funded predominantly through DTI, the Small Business Service. We were launched in 2002 by the Treasury and our remit is to grow the sector, to build its capacity and to lobby and advocate on its behalf.

  Q294  Chairman: What is your budget?

  Ms Morgan: It is £0.5 million per year. We have 10 members of staff. We also are supported by NatWest and Barclays. Core funding comes from those two banks. They each give us £20,000 a year for core funding and also help with other projects we do.

  Q295  Chairman: You are a pretty small organisation.

  Ms Morgan: Yes.

  Q296  Angela Eagle: Mr Baker, in your written evidence you talk about doorstep collection companies, and you refer to loans of £250 given by doorstep collection companies which often are only paid off with 400% plus interest rates. Do you want to say a bit about how you think your sector can make this better, assist in this?

  Mr Baker: Certainly. In the example quoted we talked about the 190%, the 400%, which is the standard rate for doorstep collection companies. Basically, a personal lending CDFI exists to provide an affordable alternative to that. The interest rates that we in Derbyloans charge for a first personal loan is 25% APR, which some people raise their eyebrows at, but that is the rate we charge, purely on the basis that that is compatible with credit card type rates; it is more expensive than the banks because clearly we are trying to provide an alternative to the bank, but we believe fundamentally it is a right for people to have an affordable alternative to the 400% they often get charged. Clearly, as a regeneration organisation, the money that people save by not having to pay that excess to the doorstep collection company is retained in the local economy, and they can use it for other things. So I think we can make a real contribution into local regeneration.

  Q297  Angela Eagle: How come you can afford to offer 25% when doorstep collection companies are charging 400%?

  Mr Baker: The quick answer is we cannot. A doorstep collection company, as a straightforward commercial organisation, has to price to risk and has to price to cover its very expensive overheads. It must cost a huge amount of money to have people going round knocking on doors every Thursday night. Personally, I do not believe a CDFI that is just doing personal lending can ever be totally self-sustaining. If we were to become self-sustaining, we would have become a doorstep collection company and become part of the problem rather than the solution. I believe a CDFI has to have other activities, other income streams, or has to be partially dependent on some sort of grant funding. My view, having run a CDFI for three years, is that you can probably get to cover about 60% of overhead costs by having a lean, mean, efficient organisation, but you are never going to get much past 60%.

  Q298  Angela Eagle: Obviously the subsidy that goes into helping you do what you do currently in competition to doorstep lenders has regeneration effects because monies are retained that would otherwise have been repaid in interest to lenders, and presumably you also see some benefits with people beginning to be able to manage loans and repay them. Is that where you think the value added is here in what you do?

  Mr Baker: Yes, absolutely. We enable people to make the best of the situation they are in by stopping them paying ridiculously high interest charges. Without wishing to quote too many anecdotes, we see numerous examples where we have made a significant impact on people's lives. For the amount of grant or unearned, if you like, funding that a CDFI needs, or a personal lending CDFIs needs, I think we provide a spectacularly good return in both a financial sense and a social sense, in as much as we move people off the bottom rung of the ladder, they gain self confidence, get back into employment, and it is a cycle of virtue, almost.

  Q299  Angela Eagle: More generally, do you think that is the role of the CDFIs, and that it would be a good idea to have them in all deprived communities rather than wait for them to spring up because of the social entrepreneurial behaviour of particular individuals?

  Ms Morgan: Definitely. One of the issues we have is that we do not have scale of coverage, so if you are in a poor community and there is not a CDFI, you cannot get that level of service that Andrew was talking about, but they do exist for that social mission purpose as well as the financial services purpose.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006