Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 328-339)

MR GERARD LEMOS AND MR SEYMOUR FORTESCUE

14 MARCH 2006

  Q328 Chairman: Gentlemen, good morning and welcome to this inquiry into financial inclusion. Would you introduce yourselves for the record?

  Mr Lemos: Gerard Lemos, Chairman of the Banking Code Standards Board.

  Mr Fortescue: Seymour Fortescue, Chief Executive of the Banking Code Standards Board.

  Q329 Chairman: Good morning and welcome again. For the benefit of new members of our Committee, could you briefly give us some background information about the Banking Code Standards Board and the Banking Code? We have had quite a long and fruitful relationship, but there are other members of the Committee who would like to be filled in.

  Mr Fortescue: Chairman, there has been a Banking Code in existence since 1991; the present one is the seventh. The Banking Code Standards Board itself has been in existence since 1999, so we are about six and a half years' old. The Banking Code covers current accounts, savings, personal loans, credit cards, ATMs and sets minimum standards which banks, building societies and credit card issuers in the UK must meet. The Code is widely regarded as a strong Code of Practice and we believe that we monitor and enforce it rigorously. Virtually the whole industry now subscribes. I am pleased to tell you that Marks & Spencer joined only a day or two ago, so we now have all major banks, building societies and credit card issuers. We are funded by the industry but independent of it, in the sense that seven of our 10 directors represent the public interest, and only three represent the industry.

  Q330  Chairman: What parts of the industry do those three represent?

  Mr Fortescue: They are the chief executives of the three major trade associations—the British Bankers' Association, the Building Societies Association and APACS.

  Q331  Chairman: What role is there for the Banking Code Standards Board and the Banking Code in promoting financial inclusion?

  Mr Fortescue: Chairman, I think the Banking Code is principally to do with the treatment of customers after they have opened their accounts, but the most important element of the Banking Code in relation to financial inclusion is what the Code says about basic bank accounts: "Before you become a customer, we will: [this is the banks] assess whether your needs are suited to a basic bank account (if we offer one) and if they are we will offer you this product; [and, secondly, we will] offer you a basic bank account if you specifically ask and meet the qualifying conditions for one". Perhaps I should mention that we have monitored and enforced those elements of the Code in relation to basic bank accounts.

  Q332  Chairman: Could you tell us how you monitor compliance?

  Mr Fortescue: Yes, but could I just mention that there are other sections of the Code which are relevant to financial inclusion, in particular the treatment of customers in financial difficulties, credit assessment and branch closure. Chairman, you asked how we go about our monitoring: we have done four major mystery shopping surveys of basic bank accounts, 1,273 mystery shops in total, and we have done it over the past four years. We have used our own staff and also we have used the market research agency NOP. In most cases we have actually gone through with opening the accounts. We have seen steady improvement in the performance of the banks that offer basic bank accounts over those four years. We have a traffic light system whereby we grade the performance of the individual banks. There are, incidentally, 15 banks and one building society offering basic bank accounts. In the mystery shopping exercise we did in 2005 we graded five of them amber and 11 green; so that was a significant improvement over the previous years although there is still scope for further improvement.

  Q333  Chairman: Consumer groups have noted that, because you do not publish the results of your mystery shopping for each individual bank, it only provides what we suggest is a weak incentive for banks to improve their practices. Will you consider providing a full record of the results of your surveys showing the performance of individual banks to this Committee?

  Mr Fortescue: Chairman, we are not a market research organisation. Our job is to monitor and enforce compliance with the Code.

  Q334  Chairman: Let me interrupt you there. We are an organisation which scrutinises the work that you and others are doing and, in order to promote financial inclusion, we need hard facts. When we hear that Bank A is good, Bank B is never any good and Bank C is not so good that is totally and utterly useless to us because it does not tell us anything. In fact given the situation that could retard the issue of financial inclusion because it gives no incentives to banks to pit themselves against the best. That is the situation we are in.

  Mr Lemos: The situation on this is that we have rules for compliance and disciplinary matters which are human rights compliant. If we were to publish the data from the mystery shopping that would, in effect, be to name and shame the poor performers which might be beneficial from your perspective, but the problem for us would be that it would be a breach of our rules.

  Q335  Chairman: Are you trying to tell me that this is against the banks' human rights for them to be named? Let me tell you, they are not shy at putting their adverts forward as to how good they are against others. Yet when we find they are a wee bit slow on things, you are saying those are their human rights? This is nonsense and I am not a lawyer, and you probably are a lawyer!

  Mr Lemos: No, I am not, but we were advised by our lawyers.

  Q336  Chairman: Could you give us that in writing from your lawyers? Could you send that information to us as to where it contravenes their human rights?

  Mr Lemos: Let me be clear, Chairman—

  Q337  Chairman: I want to be clear—that is why I am pushing you.

  Mr Lemos: The requirement of our disciplinary process, as I think is the case for all regulators including the FSA, is that they are compliant with human rights and other legislation. Our disciplinary process has as a sanction that we would name and shame people who did not comply but it would come at the end of a disciplinary process, a disciplinary hearing and people would have the right of appeal; if the information was published in advance that would second-guess the process.

  Q338  Chairman: Mystery shoppers have been into a bank and have gone for a basic bank account. In some banks 62% of customers who went in had to go to the counter to get information. That is not shaming, that is naming. That is ensuring that people who are signing up to a basic bank account get the proper treatment when they go into a bank. That is not shaming.

  Mr Lemos: We are also committed to people getting the proper treatment. The way in which we seek to achieve that is, once we have the results of mystery shopping, there is a programme of compliance activity which, over the three or four years we have been doing this, has led to an improved performance, particularly in the availability of information and behaviour of staff. I would not deny for a moment (and it is not my job to defend the banks in this respect) that there are still problems with those two requirements. Our job I think is to seek to get banks to comply with those requirements. What we want to achieve is that all banks that are members of the Banking Code fulfil the requirements of the Code.

  Q339  Chairman: Let me give you one bit of information that you have given to us in your mystery shopping survey. You have said that "one bank correctly identified the need for a basic bank account in only 37% of cases, lower than in our previous survey when the poorest performer in this area . . . achieved 45%". So here we see regression and if people want to open a basic bank account, or advisers say they should go to a particular type of bank, they are not going to get a good deal at that bank because they have gone backwards, but nobody has that information and that is totally unsatisfactory.

  Mr Lemos: But the way in which we would want to deal with that, Chairman, is to ensure that that bank, along with all the others, got those numbers up.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006