Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Question 620-639)

MR ALAN COOK AND MR GRAHAM HALLIDAY

9 MAY 2006

  Q620  Jim Cousins: But there is no specific encouragement to do that?

  Mr Cook: In response to your question, this is me articulating a likely way forward which I think would work for the different groups of the 4.3 million customers.

  Q621  Jim Cousins: Have you asked the DWP perhaps to provide some mechanism which would encourage people to migrate to your own savings account?

  Mr Cook: We are currently working with them; we are in the middle of a three-month period producing a plan as to how we would tackle these 4.3 million customers. As ever, you have to break them up into groups because the answer is going to be slightly different depending on the situation of the different segments if you like of the ownership.

  Q622  Jim Cousins: The Department of Work and Pensions is considering specific means by which people could be migrated from the Post Office Card Account to a Post Office savings account?

  Mr Cook: To alternative Post Office products, certainly.

  Q623  Jim Cousins: And there will be specific measures to encourage and incentivise that migration?

  Mr Cook: We are working on them now. This is not a conclusion; I am answering your question as to what is likely.

  Q624  Jim Cousins: Where will the resources for that encouragement and incentivisation come from? The Post Office or DWP?

  Mr Cook: We have not got that far yet. I am still working on the proposition but it seems to me if you are someone who leaves a reasonable amount of cash in your Card Account on a routine basis and you do not transact very often, we could come up with a proposition for that customer which says, "You can have a full-blown LINK card and interest" and I think it would be relatively easy to encourage those customers to make that switch.

  Q625  Jim Cousins: That is not terribly clear but at least there are some ideas for the migration process. Now back to the morphing process, morphing the Card Account into something which has broader functionality. You heard Mr Pomeroy earlier. In his world there is "the mainstream".

  Mr Cook: Yes.

  Q626  Jim Cousins: Then there is this under-world of people who have not quite got their act together—

  Mr Cook: You are starting to make me feel uncomfortable, Mr Cousins, but yes.

  Q627  Jim Cousins: This under-world of people who are not mainstream, have not got their act together, who do not have bank accounts or, if they do, they are not very good customers and they do not keep them for very long. Do you believe that any product, morphed or not, which is solely targeted at people who Mr Pomeroy's world regards as non-mainstream can survive in the longer term?

  Mr Cook: I think there is a need for a product that would enable individuals even after some further encouragement, possibly by the DWP, to take out a bank account who choose, for whatever reason, to not take out a bank account. I think there will be a group of individuals who will need a vehicle by which to obtain their benefits from the Post Office. The problem is that that is not easily cost effectively run by any institution. I believe it will cost Government to pay that benefit and they will have to put that work out to tender. I am going to tender and I am quite determined to win that business, but it will cost, it will cost Government more to distribute benefit to people who do not have a bank account than it would to people who do have a bank account. That is looking at it from their perspective.

  Jim Cousins: Let us be clear about this. You are proposing to ask the DWP to offer you, on some basis you can contract for, to morph the Post Office Card Account into something with broader functionality but still exclusively targeted at people Mr Pomeroy regards as non-mainstream, second-class people. Do you think—

  Chairman: I do not think, to be honest, Mr Pomeroy would call people "second-class people", so I think we have to keep the record straight there.

  Q628  Jim Cousins: Non-mainstream people, shall we settle for that? Do you think any product targeted exclusively at non-mainstream people can possibly survive?

  Mr Cook: I think there is little alternative for Government to recognise that in order to pay benefits to individuals who do not hold bank accounts that it will cost more money to provide that benefit than it will to people who do hold bank accounts. When they set up the vehicle to make those payments, I believe we could provide that service.

  Q629  Jim Cousins: You would not want the possibility of this morphed product perhaps at some point in the future competing alongside mainstream products for mainstream custom?

  Mr Cook: I am not too hung up on this word "mainstream" I have to say. I think the important thing for me is to recognise that where a customer has a bank account and is content for their benefit to be paid into that bank account, there is still a role for the Post Office in providing free access to the cash that is in that bank account. In fact some of those individuals may find it attractive to switch into one of our own savings accounts rather than a bank account, but for the proportion of customers who do not have bank accounts today and are ultimately not prepared to switch, there is going to have to be another vehicle established. I feel I am repeating myself now. I think we can provide that vehicle.

  Q630  Jim Cousins: Have DWP agreed to consider such a basis you can contract for?

  Mr Cook: We are working quite constructively. They probably feel that they will be obliged to put that work out to tender because that is a requirement.

  Q631  Jim Cousins: So you think it is likely, very likely, such a product will have to be made available but DWP will not necessarily contract directly with the Post Office, they may put it out to tender on a broader basis?

  Mr Cook: What I am telling you is what I believe would be the right solution. It is for DWP to say whether or not that is what they are going to do. I am just applying my background and knowledge to saying I do not see how these benefits will get paid for those customers without a replacement vehicle, but it will be on a much smaller scale than the current Card Account in terms of numbers of users. We need to look at how we can retain the customers who are currently holding Card Accounts who are probably, to be fair, customers we never had in mind—by "we" I do not mean the Post Office but the country—as being Card Account customers because they had a bank account and actually they are saving money in it.

  Q632  Mr Mudie: The thing that puzzles me is why you feel they should be obliged to tender. You seem to have accepted that, whereas it is not in your interests to accept it. We are interested in financial inclusion and the one thing that you definitely have got going for you, other than that you have the trust of the people who use your organisation, is the size and the geographical locations—14,000 locations. Banks are just not in the same league in terms of accessibility. So why tender this business? If by tendering it, you lose, there is no question that the 14,000 is under threat.

  Mr Cook: I would be very determined—

  Q633  Mr Mudie: That is joined-up government, is it not?

  Mr Cook: I would be very determined if I had to tender.

  Q634  Mr Mudie: I know you would be determined.

  Mr Cook: It is for DWP to determine whether or not they need to put this out to tender.

  Q635  Chairman: We have the Minister coming along.

  Mr Cook: I think you will find they are under some obligation under European procurement laws. That is why. It is for them to defend that rather than for me. Clearly I would love it if it did not go out to tender.

  Q636  Mr Love: You mentioned earlier there were a number of banks who do not allow their current account customers to cash cheques at the Post Office?

  Mr Cook: Yes.

  Q637  Mr Love: Are you in discussions with them and what progress are you making to persuade them to allow this facility?

  Mr Cook: As I recorded earlier in this conversation, since the last time we came before the Committee we have signed the Nationwide—I cannot claim any personal credit for that, that goes to the gentleman on my right—

  Q638  Chairman: The negotiations started at the back of the room and we are delighted to see that they were very successful. Correct, Mr Halliday?

  Mr Halliday: Absolutely, it was an excellent opportunity.

  Q639  Mr Love: Perhaps I could ask if there is any representative of HSBC, HBOS or RBS in the room, so we can start a further negotiation?

  Mr Cook: If there were, I would be out of this chair like a shot! This is sort of linked. One of the ways of achieving our aims here would be to achieve membership of LINK, because membership of LINK would effectively give us the same ends, and we did apply for membership of LINK and our application was rejected.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006