Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witness (Questions 945-959)

MS FIONA PRICE

22 MAY 2006

  Q945  Chairman: Welcome to the Committee. You are the embodiment of your Minister and the whole department for this session. I have spoken to Ian McCartney and I appreciate his difficulty. He cannot be here so we are delighted to welcome you. For the sake of the record, I mentioned the word "stuchie". John Thurso has kindly translated that to Colin Breed and "stuchie" is a Scottish word meaning a "rammy". Could you tell us what policies the DTI are promoting for financial inclusion?

  Ms Price: I know the Minister is very sorry that he cannot be here today. The Department of Trade and Industry is particularly concerned with issues around over-indebtedness and the regulation of consumer credit which clearly are very relevant to aspects of the financial inclusion agenda. We set out a strategy on tackling over-indebtedness in the Consumer Credit White Paper in December 2003 and the subsequent action plan in 2004 and reported on progress against that last year. We are funding debt advice to help those who get into financial difficulty, both telephone advice where we are giving £1 million a year to the National Debt Line and, with the face to face debt advice project now about to come on stream, there is £45 million over the next two years for that. Those are the major spending commitments.

  Q946  Chairman: Why is the DTI planning to abolish the Financial Services Consumer Panel or to weaken its statutory role under the Financial Services and Markets Act?

  Ms Price: We have no plans to abolish the Financial Services Consumer Panel. What the department has done is to consult on the possibility of setting up a new consumer body which is provisionally titled "Consumer Voice" which will bring together a number of consumer bodies with the aim of having a more coherent, stronger voice for consumers. One of the options on which we consulted would involve including the Financial Services Consumer Panel within that body. There are also options which would involve leaving it where it is. The consultation on that closed last month and we are now considering the comments we have received. We will be publishing a summary of the conclusions in due course.

  Q947  Chairman: Could you keep us informed on that?

  Ms Price: Certainly.

  Q948  Peter Viggers: The Financial Inclusion Fund to provide debt advice is going to provide advice during the period 2006/8. Can you spell out the main heads of expenditure of that 45 million?

  Ms Price: We held a competition and invited bids from advice agencies for that money. We have selected 14 projects to receive money under the fund. I cannot tell you exactly how it breaks down but very much the majority of that money will be going to pay for advisers and we are expecting to increase the adviser population by around 450 to 500 advisers.

  Q949  Peter Viggers: What are the longer term plans for providing debt advice after 2008?

  Ms Price: I clearly cannot pre-empt the outcome of the comprehensive spending review in 2007 but we will obviously be looking at the case for rolling that forward.

  Q950  Peter Viggers: How long does it take to train a financial adviser? Who is going to volunteer to become a trained financial adviser if the job is going to end in 2008?

  Ms Price: It takes about six months so there will be a good period for those people to work before March 2008.

  Q951  Peter Viggers: As long as a year perhaps: six months' training and a year's work?

  Ms Price: We would expect people to be being recruited over the summer and the first people may be coming on in the autumn so it will be more than a year.

  Q952  Peter Viggers: You may not wish to respond but I put it to you that it would help make a coherent policy if longer term plans had been announced at this point.

  Ms Price: We have to work with the government spending cycle. The future funding will be looked at as part of the comprehensive spending review.

  Q953  Peter Viggers: Is your department looking at level of debt? I note the comment of the Governor of the Bank of England that calls to the National Debt Line were at a record high. He expressed concern about high household debt levels. Does your department agree that there is a potential social problem and what steps are being taken?

  Ms Price: Levels of borrowing are certainly high and it is certainly true that the number of calls to debt advice agencies is increasing. It is not clear that the reason for the increase in numbers is that people are suffering a significantly greater problem. Other possibilities are that people are being encouraged to seek advice earlier which is something we very much want them to do and more people are seeking advice.

  Q954  Peter Viggers: Does your department take the view that the financial industry is behaving responsibly in the manner in which it advertises debt? Do you think the financial services industry should take more steps to promote debt awareness?

  Ms Price: We certainly believe that the financial services industry should act responsibly in lending and indeed that consumers should act responsibly in borrowing. We do encourage them to support the services for those who get into difficulty. We would like to see them all contributing and encourage them to do so.

  Q955  Mr Breed: At the heart of the relationship between the lender and the borrower, particularly for low income households, is the perception of fairness as such. That determines whether the contracts are fair and whether people get into trouble. Can you tell us what new duties the unfair credit provisions in the Consumer Credit Bill will place upon the lenders in particular to ensure that, when they are providing credit to low income consumers, they are looking at this whole area of fairness?

  Ms Price: The new Consumer Credit Act 2006 which has just received Royal Assent will bring in a new right for consumers to challenge credit relationships which are unfair. That will apply to all kinds of consumer credit. Consumers will be able to challenge all the conduct in the credit relationship, not just the terms of the agreement, so the way it has been operated as well, which will be a significant improvement on what we have at the moment.

  Q956  Mr Breed: The lenders will have certain duties of care to ensure that they are acting responsibly in respect of a person's ability to take on that credit and everything else. Do you think it will be rather similar to the whole idea of the mis-selling of insurance? In other words, can we get to a concept of a lender mis-selling a product to a borrower?

  Ms Price: The legislation does not approach it in quite that way but it does make clear that if a lender behaves irresponsibly the Office of Fair Trading can take that into account in deciding whether they are fit to hold a licence and can impose sanctions if they think they are not behaving appropriately. If a credit relationship or credit agreement is found to be unfair, it is unenforceable so the lender would not be able to recover the money.

  Q957  Mr Breed: If the borrower went to court, the court might decide to set it aside because it was considered, under the terms of that provision, unfair in the way it was lent?

  Ms Price: Yes. It would be open to the court to decide that or to amend the terms of the agreement so that they were seen to be fair.

  Q958  Mr Breed: Elaine Kempson told us that she was currently undertaking a study into illegal lending for the DTI and that some of the initial findings were already causing some concern. Can you give us any update on the latest results of that study?

  Ms Price: The researchers are still analysing the results of that study. The initial results suggest that illegal lending is very much focused in micro-communities. It is not widespread across the country but it is quite common in small areas. It is also suggesting that the great majority of people regard illegal lending as harmful to the community and do not want to see it happening. It is suggesting that there may be two kinds of people who are using illegal lending. There are the sort of people who have a chaotic lifestyle maybe. Often, it goes along with drug and alcohol abuse. There are other people who are financially excluded and can find no other alternative.

  Q959  Mr Breed: I find the whole concept of illegal lending quite interesting. I can understand formal and informal lending with a proper contract. I am not sure that what the lending was going to be used for might be termed illegal. I am not certain that the transaction might be. When are we going to get the results of that study and when is it going be made available?

  Ms Price: We are expecting to publish the results in July.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006