Select Committee on Treasury Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1040-1044)

ED BALLS, MR CLIVE MAXWELL AND MS SUE CATCHPOLE

22 MAY 2006

  Q1040  Chairman: Does the Treasury have overall responsibility for the Financial Inclusion Fund of £120 million, for how that is spent and the results achieved and whether the objectives are met or not?

  Ed Balls: I believe the answer to that is yes.

  Q1041  Chairman: So you are in charge, there is no problem?

  Ed Balls: I believe so.

  Mr Maxwell: We are in charge, with individual departments, spending the money for which they are responsible. The Treasury is in charge of the overall strategy of making sure that the different elements of that strategy add up to something that works.

  Ed Balls: I think that was yes.

  Q1042  Chairman: We can decode that at a later date at our leisure. Joined-up thinking and approaches are very important?

  Ed Balls: Very, very important.

  Q1043  Chairman: On that note, can I thank you for your attendance. Earlier on the shorthand writers asked me to spell "stuchie" and "rammy", which they now have. Stuchie and rammy, for your information, is nothing less than a stramash. If you are quite happy with that, I am fine. For the record, you mentioned Colin Cowdery and it is Clive Cowdery.

  Ed Balls: I apologise for that.

  Q1044  Chairman: Lastly, Minister, I look forward to working with you on the Cash Machines Taskforce.

  Ed Balls: Could I just say that this is very, very important work for us and obviously has a read-across on the particular issues we have been discussing here because of the Link issue as it affects the Post Office. I am looking forward to further discussions on that.

  Chairman: Thank you very much. Thank you for your time, Minister.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006