Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Community Development Finance Association (CDFA)

THE CDFI SECTOR

    —  The cdfa is submitting this response on behalf of its members (CDFIs).

    —  CDFIs are social enterprises which deliver financial services, principally unsecured loans, to those excluded from the mainstream banking system. The mission of CDFIs is to create wealth where it doesn't exist.

    —  The emerging CDFI sector is having a significant impact in providing affordable credit to those unable to access mainstream banking facilities.

    —  CDFIs have financed more than 9,500 businesses and individuals, created 10,000 jobs and sustained than 85,000 more. They combat poverty and create employment.

    —  In addition to the above, the sector has leveraged £160,000,000 of other funds into the businesses and households it serves.

    —  Lack of visibility over the funding of the sector is undermining its future, shaking investor confidence and threatening to close the industry, putting at risk all of the work achieved to date. The sector urgently needs clarity on the ring-fenced £11 million mentioned in paragraph 2.2-2.6 and a commitment to future funding. Many of the more mature CDFIs are unable to satisfy their market for loans from the current level of funding.

OTHER ISSUES

    —  The Financial Inclusion Task Force has a real role to play in supporting the government's work on financial inclusion. However, it needs to be in place for longer and have a remit to make policy recommendations.

    —  £20 million of the Financial Inclusion Fund remains unallocated. This submission suggests some ways forward here.

    —  The Financial Inclusion Growth Fund's design is too restrictive to achieve its own objectives.

    —  The FSA should play a key role in support of financial inclusion.

    —  The cdfa is willing to give oral evidence to the Inquiry.

1.   ABOUT THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE ASSOCIATION

  1.1  The Community Development Finance Association (cdfa) was founded in 2002 on the recommendation of HMT's Social Investment Task Force. It is the trade association for community development finance institutions (CDFIs). It has 67 members and represents the vast majority of the UK CDFIs.

  1.2  The cdfa provides training and networking opportunities to CDFIs, as well as playing an important role in setting standards among its membership. It is currently working on the development of a Code of Practice, which is intended to be binding on all members. The Code will make provision for the manner in which individual CDFIs will deal with their investors and borrowers and it is hoped it will become the basis for a form of self regulation. While the drafting and operation of the Code is a matter for the cdfa and its membership, the cdfa is able to draw upon the expertise of the FSA in determining its content.

2.   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE INSTITUTIONS

  2.1  CDFIs work to provide clients with the appropriate tools to move into the mainstream banking system, thereby promoting financial inclusion and providing a meaningful alternative to home credit, or "doorstep" lenders. CDFIs typically see their role as going beyond simply lending money and most provide free advice and other services which are intended to help ease the consequences of poverty.

  2.2  Where it is present, the sector is having a significant impact in providing affordable credit to those who need it most. CDFIs have financed more than 9,500 businesses and individuals, created 10,000 jobs and sustained 85,000 more. In addition, the sector has leveraged £160,000,000 of other funds into the businesses and the households it serves. With more adequate funding, they could do much more. However, there is currently no assured future funding and in the absence of certainty, it is difficult for CDFIs to plan ahead and meet market needs with confidence.

  2.3  The immediate problem appears to be caused by unexpected changes in government policy. The cdfa is very concerned that funding that had been earmarked for the sector could be withdrawn. When SBS staff met with the cdfa board in February last year, they advised that the SBS would ring-fence £11 million over the next two financial years for CDFI and cdfa support. It now appears that this £11 million ring-fenced fund is in jeopardy.

  2.4  This situation is most worrying as there is no other identified way of filling this potential funding gap and investors will lose confidence in CDFIs if they feel their investment has been put at risk, not by the purposes for which they had generously invested money, but by a change in government policy. This also has severe implications for CITR which has already successfully attracted £33 million into the sector and has the potential to raise substantially more as it grows and matures.

  2.5  With no clarity about future funding, exit strategies will need to be put in place in the very near future. This includes giving notice to landlords, issuing redundancy notices etc. Already, one CDFI has made four staff members redundant. Apart from the obvious loss to the individuals concerned, the CDFI has lost expertise and the return on the training it has provided.

  2.6  There is a real need to expand the work that the CDFI sector is undertaking. If the sector collapses now, doorstep lenders will lose a growing source of competition. If it is reinstated in the future, all the current infrastructure and expertise will have been lost and it will take years to re-establish and recover investor confidence.

3.   ACCESS TO BANKING SERVICES

  3.1  The emerging CDFI sector is providing access to affordable financial services to those who need it most, people who may otherwise use expensive doorstep providers.

  3.2  However, CDFIs do not just provide finance. They exist to ensure their clients can move into the mainstream sector and so CDFIs provide the support and inputs to ensure this happens, including financial education and support. This is called technical assistance. A significant amount of time is spent on technical assistance which CDFIs believe is integral to their work.

3.2  EXAMPLES OF CDFI IMPACT

WEETU (Women's Employment Enterprise and Training Unit)

  WEETU is based in Norwich and runs a loan fund with a support scheme for female micro-entrepreneurs. Jane is one of WEETU's clients. Jane set up a small business brewing beer in the garden shed. With help from WEETU she grew the operation into an award winning enterprise. She then sold it and has set up another business selling products which are made in Norfolk by local people.

  South Coast Money Line is the oldest CDFI delivering personal finance. It target area was originally Portsmouth and last year it expanded to cover the South Coast. Below are comments from clients of South Coast Money Line.

    —  Relieved the trapped feeling of needing money and not being able to get it elsewhere."

    —  "As a disabled person I am now able to be of use to the community."

    —  "It helped my wife and I through a most worrying and difficult period—we will always be grateful."

    —  "The loan helped me secure a place to live in Portsmouth and start to rebuild my life ..."

    —  "You have enabled me to get a flat tenancy, this has helped me stay clean from drugs—I never thought anyone would help an ex-addict."

    —  "I had a loan to continue my education—it is the most helpful thing that has ever happened to me—I have achieved my dream."

    —  "Without my loan I would of had to go into residential care, as a severely disabled person this would of taken away my independence ..."

    —  "I was very nervous about the loans that I had, but I came to South Coast Money Line and it took all the worry off my shoulders ..."

    —  "You helped me find a flat at a time when I was vulnerable and no one else would help, I will be forever grateful."

  The above testimonies indicate that CDFIs have a positive impact on peoples' lives. They combat poverty and increase employment prospects.

  3.3  The issues that the sector currently faces are ones which prevent it from offering its services more widely. These include:

    —  Lack of scale and coverage.

    —  Lack of forward visibility over revenue and capital funds.

    —  The need for capacity building within CDFIs.

    —  The need for income to cover technical assistance activities.

    —  The need for time to develop and pilot new products.

    —  The need to attract capital, including through the expansion of Community Investment Tax Relief.

4  ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT, THE FSA ETC

4.1  The Financial Inclusion Task Force

  The Task Force is making progress on its terms of reference, but the issues it is examining are complex and varied. It is half way through its two year life span and needs more time in order to fulfil its potential. We suggest that it exists for at least three more years and its remit is expanded to include making formal recommendations on creating an improved public policy environment for financial inclusion.

4.2  The Financial Inclusion Fund

  There seems to be around £20 million of the fund that is not allocated to any specific activity. In the spirit of transparency, the cdfa urges the government to state the activities for which these monies have been set aside. If no purpose has been identified, then the fund would be best used for building CDFIs so that they can be supported to deliver the goals of the Financial Inclusion Growth Fund. Such activities include:

    —  Short courses for new staff.

    —  Accredited training for experienced staff (which would also help to professionalise the sector).

    —  Legal support.

    —  IT inputs.

    —  Capital/revenue funds.

    —  Support for expansion and/or reaching scale.

4.3  Growth Fund

  While the cdfa appreciates the reasons for the current design of the Growth Fund, it is too restrictive to achieve its goals. Our concerns are:

    —  The fund is delivery focused and does not address the capacity building issues which are needed in advance to make delivery successful.

    —  The fund has ambitious targets which it wants to achieve in less than two years. Realistically, these targets will not be achieved. Therefore, we predict that when the fund has ceased, it will be deemed unsuccessful. This would be a disappointing outcome. We hope that more funds will be secured for continuing the Growth Fund from 2008 and that current targets will be made more realistic. We urge the Committee to look at funding which is longer term than at present. For instance, the ODPM's Local Enterprise Growth Initiative (LEGI) provides funds for a 10-year period, which is a more appropriate timescale.

4.4  The Financial Services Authority

  The FSA has the potential to play a key role in promoting financial inclusion, As a guiding principle, the FSA should be mindful of the impact on financial inclusion in the implementation of its policies.

  The CDFI sector and the cdfa have an excellent relationship with the FSA. It has provided valuable informal support to the sector, the nature of which indicates its sensitivity to the size of CDFIs, the challenges they face, their mission driven operations and the role they play in combating financial exclusion. We hope this relationship will continue.

January 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006