Select Committee on Treasury Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum submitted by Services Against Financial Exclusion (SAFE)

  I wanted to write to you to follow up on a few points that were raised during the course of the morning.

1.  ACCESS TO BANKING

1.1  POCA

  The possible closure of the Post Office Card Account concerns us. This is because they are a uniquely simple, accessible product enabling unbanked people to receive benefits by Direct Payment. As such, its withdrawal from the market place could mean the exclusion of those who are:

    —  unwilling or unable to use a more fully featured account

    —  unable to overcome barriers to opening an account, notably ID/AV and application procedures

  As well as this direct concern, the withdrawal of POCA also represents a failure to grasp the possibility of graduating people through such a basic service towards more fully featured accounts. Related to this, we consider the possibility of expanding features of the POCA to have real potential provided it continues to be genuinely debt free (eg no charges for failed transactions).

1.2  Basic bank accounts

  We found the Committee's thinking about basic bank accounts very interesting. As discussed here at Toynbee Hall, we think problems around basic bank accounts are less about the products or top level commitment within banks, and much more about patchy implementation at a local level.

  Rather than see recommendations for structural change, we believe that a combination of localised intermediaries from community based organisations, coupled with ongoing consultation and assessment around core elements of the client experience can make a real difference.

  We would be interested in taking this discussion further, to talk about further issues such as streamlining information, marketing and accessibility.

2.  NETWORKS

  I wanted to emphasise the importance that we place on developing networks of best practice to be able to achieve the highest level of potential change in the area of financial inclusion. To this end, we are proud of the Financial Inclusion Forum, which to date has 250 members and is dedicated to providing support to practitioners, policy makers, financial service providers and funders. As the first UK-wide network of projects and associations involved in financial inclusion work we seek to be a facilitator for change in the sector nationally.

3.  A JOINED UP APPROACH TO FUNDING

  The question was raised about how Government sources of funding work in the voluntary sector. Through our recent experience with funding streams from the Department for Work and Pensions and the Department for Education and Skills—we feel strongly that this statutory funding often works in isolation, without initiating a joined up approach to delivering financial inclusion.

  For example, through its Payment Modernisation Programme DWP invested in the creation within Toynbee Hall of a team of experts working across London with unbanked, low-income and often hard to reach clients. This work was high-quality, and directly relevant to fulfilling government objectives around financial inclusion. However, in the re-contracting process, priority was given to narrow measures of cost effectiveness within a contracting process, rather than the value to stated policy goals. This resource has now been dismantled.

  Toynbee Hall generates real value for government through these extended networks. We are leading the Financial Inclusion for London partnership in its bid to the DTI's Fact to Face Debt Advice Project. This work will aim to reach the financially excluded in part by reviving the dormant structures which supported the DWP work.

  We are keen for government to capitalise on these existing structures in its efforts to tackle financial exclusion.

  We hope that Toynbee Hall can continue to engage in creative dialogue with the Treasury Select Committee. We feel passionately about the work that we do here at Toynbee Hall where we can test actions at local level that have the potential to become national solutions. We would be delighted to share our networks and practical experiences with you wherever appropriate.

February 2006






 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 16 November 2006