Select Committee on Work and Pensions Minutes of Evidence


Annex

WORK AND PENSIONS SELECT COMMITTEE 9 NOVEMBER

RESPONSES TO WRITTEN QUESTIONS

Your memorandum (3.3) (ie the Jobcentre Plus memorandum) refers to a programme to centralise benefit processing operations. What benefits do you expect to derive from this and will it involve any outsourcing of staff?

  The plan for centralising benefit processing forecasts savings in staff costs and reduced Jobcentre Plus estate running costs.

Of the 25% total staff costs efficiency savings planned, 10% are directly attributable to the centralisation of benefit processing, whilst the remaining 15% will be delivered by other efficiency initiatives as part of the Delivering Our Vision Programme. The centralisation of benefit processing facilitates the closure of 37 buildings by March 2008. Current planning assumptions in the centralisation of benefit processing do not include any outsourcing of staff. Savings currently identified are not predicated on outsourcing of staff, but in the reduction of overall headcount.

Jobcentre Plus expects centralisation to support better performance management and, over time, workflow management. It will also provide a more compact base for future IT improvements.

The Public Accounts Committee recently reported that "the recent major re-organisation to form Jobcentre Plus and the Pension Service led to an increase in the level of errors by officials." What are you doing to reduce error levels?

Reducing monetary value of fraud and error in the primary benefits is one of the main Jobcentre Plus performance targets.

Jobcentre Plus is introducing Standard Operating Models covering its key business processes. A component of the model covering new claims has already been published and further components covering claims maintenance are in advanced stages of development. Compliance with the Standard Model will reduce official error.

Jobcentre Plus has introduced a new benefit Case Management Framework to improve accuracy. Managers identify areas at a local level where performance in benefit accuracy needs improving. The Framework is then used as an improvement toolkit. Managers look at the performance of different job roles and specific categories where performance needs to be improved. The Framework sets standards and provides access to appropriate supporting material such as training packages, instructions and desk aids.

The Jobcentre Plus regime of mandatory management checks of benefit payments has been reviewed. A new checking regime allowing better targeting of checks to problem areas is currently being piloted in three districts with national implementation scheduled for early 2006.

Jobcentre Plus analyses findings on main causes of error regularly and develops specific performance improvement measures to tackle the main causes of error. Measures introduced include changes to systems, instructions, training materials and supporting products.

In the five months covered by its 2004-05 accounts, the Disability and Carers Service paid £251,000 in compensation to customers whose cases had been badly handled. What was the figure for Jobcentre Plus during 2004-05 and how do you learn lessons from these cases?

  In 2004-05, Jobcentre Plus paid £2 million in compensation to customers whose cases had been badly handled, in line with the Department's Special Payment Scheme.

In order to improve the decision making process, and to ensure that claims for compensation are made quickly and lessons learnt, Special Payment Teams are encouraged to:

    —    provide training for their customer-facing colleagues;

    —    offer advice and guidance via the intranet; and

    —    share best practice via regular attendance at staff meetings.

  This includes providing regular reports on the amount of compensation paid and common errors to senior managers.

  All Jobcentre Plus Special Payment Teams attend quarterly networking meetings to share best practice and discuss and seek resolution to difficult cases and common issues.

  Management information on customer complaints and compensation paid is collated on a quarterly basis for the Jobcentre Plus Business Report; this is distributed to all senior managers, including the Board.

The Disability and Carers Service is in the process of introducing a new scheme—Accreditation of Decision Makers—which aims to develop consistency and standards of decision-making. Are you planning to introduce a similar scheme for Jobcentre Plus?

  Jobcentre Plus has not yet come to a view about accreditation of Decision Makers. The Agency is actively reviewing its decision-making processes and targets in the light of recent reports by the NAO and the Decision Making Standards Committee.

How successfully does Jobcentre Plus work with other DWP agencies, particularly the Disability and Carers Service, the Child Support Agency, the Pension Service and local authorities and how could these arrangements be improved?

Successful working relationships with other agencies are fundamental to much of the work of Jobcentre Plus.

Jobcentre Plus recognises that some aspects of particular relationships have not worked as well as they should and work is in hand to improve them. In particular, a new team in Jobcentre Plus, the Governmental Partnerships Team, has been given responsibility for ensuring, for example, that there are clear, consistent and up to date partnership agreements and that the right mechanisms are in place for tackling issues and exchanging good practice.

Jobcentre Plus has Partnership Agreements with most of the other main agencies within DWP and with HM Revenue and Customs and the Local Authorities. They cover a wide range of process relationships that are crucial to the delivery of both the back to work and benefit agendas.

Specifically, Jobcentre Plus has an important role to play in assisting the Child Support Agency (CSA) to deliver its strategic plan. Jobcentre Plus liaises regularly with CSA on operational issues: as well as working together at a national level there are a number of joint steering groups and regional liaison meetings that look at issue resolution and sharing of good practice.

Your accounts state that Jobcentre Plus has given formal guarantee in respect of a bank overdraft for Remploy Limited up to a maximum of £15 million (page 106). They continue that at 31 March 2005, £14.3 million of the overdraft facility had been utilised. Have you been asked to increase that level of guarantee?

Jobcentre Plus has not been asked to increase the level of the guarantee. During the current financial year Remploy have not exceeded their overdraft limit, and there has been no request to do so. If, as part of the business planning process between the Remploy Board, the Department for Work and Pensions and Jobcentre Plus, any such increase were to be proposed, this would be strictly subject to approval by Parliament.

As part of the ongoing financial and governance arrangements between Jobcentre Plus and Remploy, the Secretary of State, with Parliamentary approval, can agree an overdraft limit for the company. This is commensurate with the company's need for sufficient Working Capital in its businesses, and is in line with the Financial Memorandum and Management Statement between Jobcentre Plus and Remploy.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 8 February 2006