Charities Bill [Lords]


[back to previous text]

Edward Miliband: If I were giving star ratings to the hon. Gentleman’s amendments, amendment No. 72 would be low down the list—indeed, I am not sure that it would receive more than one star. Let me explain why.
The matters set out in paragraphs (a) and (b) of proposed new subsection (Z1) are for the Charity Commission, which will have to provide an annual report to Parliament. Paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) have only tangential relevance to the Bill. However many important claims I would make for the Bill, I would not claim that it will have a huge impact on the operation of gift aid, the total net cost of value added tax or the number and value of central Government contracts, although that is not to say that some of the other things that are being done will not affect them. All Departments produce an annual report, which will certainly cover issues such as those that the hon. Gentleman has raised.
Martin Horwood: If the Minister were to give an assurance that his Department’s annual report will cover all the subjects in the amendment, I would happily withdraw it.
Edward Miliband: I will not do that, but I shall give the hon. Gentleman the assurance that we will attempt to cover the issues that he raises, while of course respecting the fact that tax—as I am sure even the Liberal Democrats know—is a matter for Her Majesty’s Treasury. I would not want to trespass upon that territory, but I am sure that the more general issues affecting the charitable sector will be covered in the annual report.
Peter Bottomley: While the Minister is dealing gently and fairly with the hon. Member for Cheltenham, could he tell the Committee what kind of person he might have in mind to commence the review? Also, given that the clause says that the review should start within five years of the passing of the legislation, roughly how long does the Minister think the review might take?
Edward Miliband: I believe that the review is to be conducted by central Government. That is the commitment made in the Bill. If the hon. Gentleman is proposing himself a potential reviewer, I am sure that he will be considered by the relevant Minister at the time. No doubt the hon. Gentleman has important qualifications in that respect.
Peter Bottomley rose—
Edward Miliband: I was going to say that I hoped that the hon. Gentleman would be satisfied with that, but I should have known better.
Peter Bottomley: If it was intended that central Government conduct the review, the Bill would make that plain, but subsection (1) states:
“The Secretary of State must, before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which this Act is passed, appoint a person to review generally the operation of this Act.”
I am not saying that Minister ought to know five years in advance the name of the person who might be appointed, but perhaps on Report he can give an illustrative example of how that appointment might take place and say whether the report should be completed within one or two years.
Edward Miliband: I give that undertaking.
Martin Horwood: I am grateful to the Minister for his comments, from which I take some comfort. If he is going to attempt to address the relative benefits of the various tax breaks and the tax cost of irrecoverable VAT in his annual report, as I think he undertook to do—
Edward Miliband indicated dissent.
Martin Horwood: Well, he said that he would attempt to cover those issues. I am sure that his hon. Friends in the Treasury would look kindly on his addressing at least the impact of the tax implications of VAT on sector, but if that is not possible, perhaps he could encourage the Chancellor to do so another time. Under those circumstances, I beg to ask leave to withdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Clause 72 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clause 73

Orders and regulations
Edward Miliband: I beg to move amendmentNo. 191, in clause 73, page 78, line 16, at end insert—
‘(ba) any regulations under section (Disclosure of information to and by Northern Ireland regulator),’.
The Chairman: With this it will be convenient to discuss the following: Government amendments Nos. 192, 194 to 199 and 193.
Government new clause 14—Disclosure of information to and by Northern Ireland regulator.
Edward Miliband: The amendments are relatively technical. I apologise to the Committee for their late tabling on Tuesday. We have tried to avoid tabling bundles of amendments at the last minute, but it took longer to prepare these amendments than I had hoped. I shall briefly explain what they will do.
The revised version of section 10 of the Charities Act 1993 provides for the disclosure of information to and by the Charity Commission. It includes specific provisions relating to the exchange of information by the commissioners for Revenue and Customs.
The purpose of the Government amendments is fourfold. First, they will modernise the information-sharing gateway between the commissioners for Revenue and Customs and the Charity Commission to reflect changes to the way in which HMRC wishes to disclose information following the passing of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005. Secondly, the amendments will extend the gateway for the sharing of information, including Revenue and Customs information, to principal regulators of exempt charities. Thirdly, they make provision for sharing of information including commissioners of Revenue and Customs’ information with the proposed regulator of charities in Northern Ireland. Finally, they make some minor changes to the rules governing disclosure of other information to and by the Charity Commission. I hope that that brief explanation satisfies the Committee.
Peter Bottomley: I am sure that what the Minister has outlined makes sense. I congratulate peopleon spotting one or two of the moves from “commissioners” to “commission”, which are a consequence of earlier parts of the Bill.
Is Government new clause 14 precedented? The Minister will know that it relates to the provision whereby, if a charity commission in Northern Ireland is established, various other things happen. I can see the reason for the new clause, and it makes sense, but is it a legislative innovation?
Edward Miliband: I gather that it is not a legislative innovation.
Amendment agreed to.
Amendment made: No. 192, in clause 73, page 78, line 21, after ‘(b),’ insert ‘(ba),’.—[Edward Miliband.]
Clause 73, as amended, ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Clause 74

Amendments, repeals, revocations and transitional provisions
Question put, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Peter Bottomley: I think that the clause is drafted to provide a sensible and limited power. The guts of it are subsections (4) and (5). Subsection (4) states:
“The Secretary of State may by order make—
(a) such supplementary, incidental or consequential provision, or
(b) such transitory, transitional or saving provision
as he considers appropriate for the general purposes, or any particular purpose of this Act or in consequence of, or for giving full effect to, any provision made by this Act.”
Subsection (5) states:
“An order made under subsection (4) may amend, repeal, revoke or otherwise modify any enactment.”
The first three subsections of the clause are relevant to schedules 8, 9 and 10, but subsections (4) and (5) are not tied to them. I am not suggesting that the Minister has created the opportunity to drove a coach and horses through any part of charity law provision, but I would like the Committee to have his reassurance on what the limitations are.
Edward Miliband: My understanding is that there are constraints in the legislation, but to be fair to the hon. Gentleman, I should write to him and set them out on paper.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 74 ordered to stand part of the Bill.

Schedule 8

Minor and consequential amendments
Amendment made: No. 180, in schedule 8, page 133, line 17, at end insert—

‘Police, Factories, &c. (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1916(c. 31)

14A (1) Section 5 of the Police, Factories, &c. (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1916 (regulation of street collections) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1) for “the benefit of charitable or other purposes,” substitute “any purposes in circumstances not involving the making of a charitable appeal,”.
(3) In paragraph (b) of the proviso to subsection (1) omit the words from “, and no representation” onwards.
(4) In subsection (4) before the definition of “street” insert—
““charitable appeal” has the same meaning as in Chapter 1 of Part 3 of the Charities Act 2006;”’.—[Edward Miliband.]
Edward Miliband: I beg to move amendmentNo. 181, in schedule 8, page 138, line 24, at end insert—

‘Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (c. 65)

In section 21A of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (public authorities) in paragraph 14 in the Table of Exceptions in subsection (9), for “Charity Commissioners for England and Wales” substitute “Charity Commission”.’.
The Chairman: With this it will be convenient to discuss Government amendments Nos. 182, 59 to 61, 63 and 64 and 184 to 187.
Edward Miliband: The group consists entirely of minor or technical amendments.
Amendment agreed to.
Amendments made: No. 182, in schedule 8, page 143, leave out lines 21 to 29.
No. 183, in schedule 8, page 144, line 31, at end insert—
‘91A In section 79 (short title, commencement and extent) omit—
(a) in subsection (6), the words “(subject to subsection (7))”, and
(b) subsection (7).
91B In Schedule 7 (repeals) omit the entry relating to the Police, Factories, &c. (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1916 (c. 31).’.
No. 59, in schedule 8, page 144, line 33, at end insert—
‘92A In the heading for Part 1, for “CHARITY COMMISSIONERS” substitute “CHARITY COMMISSION”.’.
No. 194, in schedule 8, page 145, line 32, leave out ‘COMMISSION’S’.
No. 195, in schedule 8, page 146, line 32, leave out paragraph 99 and insert—
‘99 For section 10 substitute—
“10 Disclosure of information to Commission
(1) Any relevant public authority may disclose information to the Commission if the disclosure is made for the purpose of enabling or assisting the Commission to discharge any of its functions.
No. 60, in schedule 8, page 148, line 41, after ‘was”,’, insert—
‘(ba) for “they act” substitute “it acts”,’.—[Edward Miliband.]
 
Previous Contents Continue
House of Commons 

home page Parliament home page House of 

Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 14 July 2006