Education and Inspections Bill
Mr.Gibb: I am happy with the Ministers assurances andI am grateful for his full and clear response. We share theGovernments concern on how to deal with schools that areunderperforming or causing concern, and we therefore agree with thepolicy of withdrawing delegated budgets from such schools and fromgoverning bodies that do not handle their budgets properly. In light ofthat and the Ministers assurances, I beg to ask leave towithdraw the amendment.
Amendment, by leave,withdrawn.
Clause 45ordered to stand part of theBill.
Powersof local education authority in respect of supportservices
(1) A localeducation authority in England may make such provision as it thinks fitto ensure the availability to schools maintained by it of education andchild-related supportservices.
(2) Services madeavailable under this section mayinclude
(a) servicesfor children with special educational needs, looked after children andchildren educated otherwise than inschool;
(b) behaviour supportservices;
(c) educationalpsychology services;
(d)curriculum advisory services;and
(e) such other services asthe authority may consider desirable.'. [Mr.Chaytor.]
Broughtup, and read the First time.
The new clauseis straightforward. Both the Bill and the original education WhitePaper published last October place considerable emphasis on the newstrategic role of local authorities as champions of parents and pupils,and as the agents by which standards in schools will be improved.However, nowhere in the Bill is there a description of the precisefunctions of local authorities. New clause 18 would do that. It wouldenable each local authority to decide, as it thinks fit, whether itshould provide facilities for children with special educational needs,behaviour support facilities, educational psychology services, curriculumadvisory services or other support services to schools.
There is an analogy to be drawnwith the original provisions in the White Paper on local authoritiesnot being able to promote new community schools, and the finalagreement that was reached, under which they would be allowed topromote them subject to a quality thresholdexactly the samearguments that applied to the debate on their powers to promotecommunity schools are applicable to their powers to offer the variousadvisory services. I should be interested to hear what the Minister hasto say about incorporating those specific functions of localauthorities into the Bill.
GregMulholland (Leeds, North-West) (LD): The new clause issimple but important. The Bill does not put enough emphasis onsupporting schools in the areas that it covers, and the provisionaddresses the lack of detail with a comprehensive list of the relevantservices. We support it, because it clarifies and strengthens thestrategic role of local authorities that we think is soimportant.
JimKnight: Local authorities are central to the vision thatwe set out in the White Paper, as the champions of pupils and parentsand through their role as strategic commissioner and guardian ofstandards, which are all within their new duties to promote choice anddiversity and high standards, and the fulfilment of the potential ofall children in their area. The Education and Skills Committeerecognised that in its report when itsaid:
It isclear that local authorities will continue to have a vital role in theorganisation of education in their areas. Rather than having their rolereduced, local authorities have significant and even increasedresponsibilities.
Given that new role, Iunderstand why my hon. Friend the Member for Bury, North wants toensure that local authorities have the necessary powers to carry outtheir challenging agenda. It is our opinion that local authoritiesalready have wide powers to do that, including in those areas ofactivity specified in the new clause. They have wide powers to supportschools as they see fit, and to respond effectively to local needs.Those can be found in the Education Act 1996, the Local Government Act2000, the Children Act 2004 and the School Finance (England)Regulations 2006.
Ihope that what I have said is sufficient to reassure my hon. Friend.Although I sympathise with what he is trying to achieve, it is notnecessary and might fetter the ability of local authorities to providesupport services tailored to the individual needs of their localschools and children.
Motion and clause, by leave,withdrawn.
Useof property held in trust for purpose of primaryeducation
A local authoritywhich holds property as a trustee for purposes to which the ElementaryEducation Act 1870 applied may apply the capital and income of suchproperty for the purposes of primary education.'. [Dr.Blackman-Woods.]
Broughtup, and read the Firsttime.
Dr.Roberta Blackman-Woods (City of Durham) (Lab): I beg tomove, That the clause be read a Second time.
I tabled the new clause tohighlight the issue of funds accruing under the Elementary EducationAct 1870 that local authorities cannot use for primary education.Apparently, the Act states that local authorities are trustees ofproperties built under the Act, but when those properties are sold thelocal authority cannot reinvest the money in supporting primaryeducation in the local authority area. I know that a number of localauthorities have money in accounts which they would like to use tosupport primary education or new building.
If the Minister cannot acceptthe new clause, I should be grateful if the Department could considerways of dealing with the problem by some othermeans.
JimKnight: I am grateful to my hon. Friend for explainingwhat lies behind the new clause. It is right that when educational landor assets are sold the proceeds should be reinvested in improvingeducational provision. I know that one or two of my hon. Friends areconcerned about that, and I am happy to explore the problem with myofficials. It would probably help us if my hon. Friend and others whoare concerned about this met us so that we can pursue the matter andsee whether there is a way of resolvingit.
Dr.Blackman-Woods: I am very grateful to my hon. Friend forthat invitation. I beg to ask leave to withdraw themotion.
Motion andclause, by leave,withdrawn.
Meaningof maintained school and elgible forintervention
(1A) In this partrelevant school means any of the following schools inEngland
(b) a city technologycollege, or
(c) a city collegefor the technology of thearts.'.
TheChairman: With this it will be convenient to discuss thefollowing amendments: No. 508, in clause 47, page 34, line 30, afterschool', insert or other relevantschool'.
No. 509, inclause 47, page 35, line 9, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
No. 510, inclause 48, page 36, line 19, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
No. 511, inclause 49, page 36, line 36, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
No. 512, inclause 50, page 37, line 6, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
No. 513, inclause 51, page 37, line 37, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
No. 514, inclause 52, page 39, line 6, after school', insert orother relevantschool'.
SarahTeather: The amendments deal with a recurrent theme oftrying to determine how the Bill applies to all schools, includingacademies and city technology colleges. We know that there are as manyfailing or coasting academies as there are good schools in themaintained sector. When we discussed school improvement partners, theright hon. Member for Redditch suggested that because the Secretary ofState was the maintaining authority for academies, the Secretary ofState would directly appoint SIPs.
We have tabled the amendmentsto probe the Government on how the provisions in clauses 46 and 47would apply to academies and city technology colleges. Will thisrequire another set of amendments to each funding agreement? Is thatnot an extremely complicated way of making the changes? Would it not beeasier simply to accept our amendment? I know that it would go verymuch against the grain for the Government to accept any amendment fromthe Liberal Democrats, but perhaps it would be easier to amend the Billand ensure that the provisions apply to allschools.
Maintainingacademies would mean that, when the 100 new academies open, theDepartment for Education and Skills would be the largest provider of11-to-16 education in the country. I should be interested to see howthe Secretary of State manages to juggle all of those responsibilitiescompared with local authorities and whether the Department willcontinue to berate local authorities for their performance with quitethe enthusiasm that it has done in thepast.
JimKnight: I recognise the hon. Ladys motives fortabling the amendments. I will not go through them individually becausethere is not enough time, but they are unnecessary. The types of stateschool in question must be outside the local authority system. Theyhave deliberately been made non-maintained schools, with independentgovernance and sponsor bodies. That independence affords them thefreedoms and flexibilities to raise standards in schools where therehas been prolonged under-achievement. Indeed, academies are improvingthree times faster than the national average at GCSE. We cannot accepta situation wherein, if a non-maintained school is deemed inadequate,the local authority takes over again. That would not only go back onthe
The Bill provides fornon-maintained school proprietorsoften the controllingtrustto take action immediately when the school gets aninadequate judgment from Ofsted inspectors. Proprietors are required toproduce a statement of action setting out how they will secureimprovements at the school, build the capacity of the schoolsmanagement team, involve registered parents in the planning process anddetermine what support the school requires from external partnerorganisations. That requirement mirrors the requirement on localauthorities in respect of maintained schools.
I have asked what mirrors theprocess of warning notices. The academies have a duty to have regard toadvice from the Secretary of State, which effectively provides asimilar mechanism. The Secretary of State can intervene in an academythrough the articles of association and funding agreement held betweenthe Department and the academy trust; he may appoint additionalgovernors, stop funding or close the academy. Those are very similarpowers to those that local authorities have in relation to maintainedschools. I hope, on that basis, that the hon. Lady will withdraw heramendment, but I do not believe that shewill.
SarahTeather: I thank the Minister for his reply. It seems tous that no directly accountable tier of Government is responsible foracademies, unless the Secretary of State is solely responsible forevery school. As I said, that would require the Secretary of State tobe the largest maintaining authority in England, which seems aridiculous centralisation of responsibilities.
At this stage, I see no pointin pressing the amendment to a Division as the Government are clearlynot going to accept it. We have put it on the record that we areunhappy with the level of responsibility and the relationship betweenlocal authorities. We will consider whether to return to this matter onReport. I beg to ask leave to withdraw theamendment.
Clause46 ordered to stand part of theBill.
Warningnotice by local educationauthority
Mr.Chaytor: I beg to move amendment No. 453, in clause 47,page 34, line 34, leave out fifteenth' and inserttwentieth'.
TheChairman: With this it will be convenient to discuss thefollowing amendments: No. 454, in clause 47, page 36, line 13, leaveout fifteenth' and inserttwentieth'.
No.455, in clause 47, page 36, line 15, leave out from means' toend of line 17 and insert
any day of the total number of days uponwhich teachers are required to be available for work at the school inaccordance with an order made under section 122 of the Education Act2002'.
|©Parliamentary copyright 2006||Prepared 10 May 2006|