House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2006 - 07
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 16th October 2007                

43

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

(ba)    

the reference in subsection (3A) to an order specified in

 

subsection (3B) shall be construed as a reference to an order

 

under Article 5(1) of the Life Sentences (Northern Ireland) Order

 

2001.” ’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

84

 

Clause  16,  page  11,  line  38,  leave out first ‘is’ and insert ‘and the Board are’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

85

 

Clause  16,  page  12,  leave out lines 13 and 14.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

86

 

Clause  18,  page  13,  line  22,  after ‘may,’, insert ‘with the approval of the Lord

 

Chief Justice or a judge designated by him,’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

87

 

Clause  19,  page  14,  line  29,  at end add—

 

‘(10)    

For the avoidance of doubt there is a rebuttable presumption that any prisoner of

 

a category referred to in section 46ZA will be removed from the United Kingdom

 

following his release without prejudice to any existing rights not to be, or

 

protections from being, removed under British or European Union law.’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

88

 

Clause  20,  page  15,  line  28,  at end add—

 

‘(9)    

For the avoidance of doubt there is a rebuttable presumption that any prisoner of

 

a category referred to in section 259A will be removed from the United Kingdom

 

following his release without prejudice to any existing rights not to be, or

 

protections from being, removed under British or European Union law.’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

89

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  24,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘50’.


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 16th October 2007                

44

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

90

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  24,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘45’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

91

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  24,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘35’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

92

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  24,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘30’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

93

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  24,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘25’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

94

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  32,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘50’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

95

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  32,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘45’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

96

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  32,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘35’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

97

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  32,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘30’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

98

 

Clause  22,  page  16,  line  32,  leave out ‘20’ and insert ‘25’.


 
 

Notices of Amendments: 16th October 2007                

45

 

Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

99

 

Page  19,  line  18,  leave out Clause 26

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

100

 

Clause  26,  page  19,  line  23,  at end insert ‘and they have a certificate from the trial

 

judge confirming that the evidence heard by him and the jury was sufficient to prove the

 

prosecution case and that he had admitted and the jury had considered, and been directed

 

by him in relation to, the relevance of any evidence of the procedural or other

 

misconduct.’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

101

 

Clause  26,  page  20,  leave out line 6 and insert ‘may, as the Court think fit in the

 

interests of justice in that case, either direct that there be a retrial or that the appellant be

 

acquitted.’.

 

Mr Edward Garnier

 

Mr David Burrowes

 

Mr Nick Hurd

 

102

 

Clause  26,  page  20,  line  6,  at end add ‘, who must initiate or not initiate such

 

criminal or civil proceedings (or both) as he thinks best suit the justice of the case (taking

 

into account the impact on the victim of the offence or his family of his decision either to

 

proceed or not) and which decision either to proceed or not will provide the most suitable

 

redress to the subject of such misconduct, deter any such misconduct in the future and

 

restore public confidence in the criminal justice system.’.

 


 
previous section contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Revised 17 October 2007