|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| Wednesday 17th October 2007 |
|
| For other Amendment(s) see the following page(s) of Supplement to Votes:
|
|
| |
| |
| Serious Crime Bill [Lords], As Amended |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 1, line 6 [Clause 1], after ‘satisfied’, insert ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 2, line 5 [Clause 1], after ‘satisfied’, insert ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 2, line 3 [Clause 1], at end insert— |
|
| | ‘(c) | it is informed by the Director of Public Prosecutions— |
|
| | (i) | that there is no reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution |
|
| | of the individual in respect of the involvement in serious crime |
|
| | |
| | (ii) | that such a prosecution would not be in the public interest.’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 2, line 9 [Clause 1], at end insert— |
|
| | ‘(c) | it is informed by the Director of Public Prosecutions— |
|
| | (i) | that there is no reasonable prospect of a successful prosecution |
|
| | of the individual in respect of the involvement in serious crime |
|
| | |
| | (ii) | that such a prosecution would not be in the public interest.’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 2, line 38 [Clause 2], leave out from ‘1’ to end of line 41. |
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 3 [Clause 2], leave out line 20. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 3, line 23 [Clause 3], leave out from ‘Wales’ to end of line 27. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 3, line 47 [Clause 3], leave out from ‘1’ to end of line 3 on page 4. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 4 [Clause 3], leave out line 27. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 4, line 30 [Clause 3], leave out from ‘Ireland’ to end of line 34. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 5, line 5 [Clause 4], leave out from ‘must’ to end of line 9 and insert |
|
| ‘determine that the defendant acted unreasonably in the circumstances’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 5, line 13 [Clause 4], leave out from ‘ignore’ to end of line 17 and insert |
|
| ‘determine that the defendant acted unreasonably in the circumstances’. |
|
| | |
| |
| | |
| To move the following Clause:— |
|
| | ‘(1) | On the expiration of an order the court shall make a new order to the same or |
|
| | |
| | (a) | on the presentation by the applicant authority of new evidence not used |
|
| | as the basis for the original order; and |
|
| | (b) | after a review has been undertaken by the Director of Public Prosecutions |
|
| | of the possibility of criminal prosecution; |
|
| | | the court has reasonable gounds to believe that the making of the order would |
|
| | protect the public by preventing, restricting or disrupting involvement, by the |
|
| | person who is the subject of the order, in serious crime in England and Wales.’. |
|
| |
|