House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2006 - 07
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Pensions Bill


 
 

 

Pensions Bill

LORDS INSISTENCE, REASON AND AMENDMENTS IN LIEU

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 61, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

After Clause 18

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 22

22

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Purchase of annuities

 

The Secretary of State shall, as soon as is reasonably practicable, by

 

regulations require the trustees of qualifying schemes as defined by the

 

Financial Assistance Scheme Regulations 2005 (S.I. 2005/1986) which have

 

not yet completed winding-up to desist from purchasing (except where, on

 

or before 18th April 2007, they have entered into a binding contractual

 

commitment so to do) or making binding commitments to purchase

 

annuities on behalf of scheme members, for a period of nine months from

 

18th April 2007.”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 22 for the following Reason—

22A

Because the Commons consider that the prohibition on the purchase of annuities may have

 

undesirable effects.

 

LORDS NON-INSISTENCE AND AMENDMENTs IN LIEU

 

The Lords do not insist on their Amendment No. 22, but do propose the following

 

Amendments Nos. 22B to 22D in lieu—

22B

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Temporary restriction on the purchase of annuities

 

(1)    

The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for securing

 

that, during the period of 9 months beginning with the date on which the

 

regulations come into force, the trustees of relevant pension schemes are

 
 
Bill 15254/2

 
 

Pensions Bill

2

 
 

prohibited from purchasing, or agreeing to purchase, annuities on behalf of

 

qualifying members, unless—

 

(a)    

before that date they have entered into a binding commitment to

 

purchase the annuities, or

 

(b)    

the purchase of the annuities is approved in pursuance of

 

subsection (2).

 

(2)    

The regulations must make provision—

 

(a)    

for enabling the trustees of a relevant pension scheme to apply to

 

the scheme manager for approval of the purchase of annuities on

 

behalf of qualifying members;

 

(b)    

for authorising the scheme manager to approve the purchase of any

 

such annuities if the scheme manager thinks it appropriate to do so.

 

(3)    

For the purposes of this section an occupational pension scheme is a

 

“relevant pension scheme” at any time during the period mentioned in

 

subsection (1) if at that time the scheme is a qualifying pension scheme

 

which has not been fully wound up.

 

(4)    

Regulations under this section—

 

(a)    

must be made as soon as is reasonably practicable after the passing

 

of this Act;

 

(b)    

may make such consequential, incidental, supplemental or

 

transitional provision as the Secretary of State considers

 

appropriate.

 

(5)    

A statutory instrument containing regulations under this section is subject

 

to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament.

 

(6)    

In this section “occupational pension scheme”, “qualifying member”,

 

“qualifying pension scheme” and “scheme manager” have the same

 

meanings as in section 286 of the Pensions Act 2004 (c. 35).”

Clause 28

22C

Page 26, line 36, at end insert “and section (Temporary restriction on purchase of

 

annuities)”

Clause 29

22D

Page 27, line 10, at end insert “and section (Temporary restriction on purchase of

 

annuities)”

Before Clause 23

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 28

28

Insert the following new Clause—

 

“Post-legislative scrutiny

 

Four years after the passing of this Act the Secretary of State shall arrange

 

for post-legislative scrutiny of this Act to check on its operation and may

 

arrange subsequent scrutiny.”


 
 

Pensions Bill

3

 
 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 28 for the following Reason—

28A

Because the Commons consider that imposing an obligation on the Secretary of State to

 

arrange for post-legislative scrutiny is unnecessary.

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 28 for the following Reason—

28B

Because the Lords remain of the view that it is appropriate to impose an early obligation on

 

the Secretary of State to arrange for post-legislative scrutiny.


 
 

Pensions Bill

4


 
contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Revised 25 July 2007