Previous Section Index Home Page

In addition there is a transfer from Resource DEL Indirect (non-cash) to Resource DEL Direct (near cash) of £100,000,000, mainly for fuel costs.

The changes to Resource DEL and Capital DEL will lead to an increased net cash requirement of £1,699,982,000.

Armed Forces' Pay Review Body - (Appointment)

The Secretary of State for Defence (Des Browne): I am pleased to announce that I have appointed Mr Keith Murray McNeish for a three year term of office as a member of the Armed Forces' Pay Review Body commencing March 2007. This appointment has been conducted in accordance with the guidance of the Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments.


21 Nov 2006 : Column 30WS

Deputy Prime Minister

Departmental Expenditure Limits 2006-07

The Deputy Prime Minister (Mr. John Prescott): Subject to Parliamentary approval of the new Estimate, the Deputy Prime Minister's Office Departmental Expenditure Limits for 2006-07 will be £1,960,000 as set out in the table below:

New DEL
£'000ChangeVotedNon-votedTotal

Resource DEL

0

1,960

0

1,960

Of which: Administration Budget

0

1,960

0

1,960

Near-cash in RDEL

0

1,940

0

1,940

Capital

Depreciation*

Total

0

1,960

0

1,960

Depreciation, which forms part of resource DEL, is excluded from the total DEL, since capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting.

The administration costs limit for the Deputy Prime Minister's Office will be £1,960,000 million. This resource will be used for the costs of its administration.

Education and Skills

Teacher's Pension Scheme (England and Wales)

The Minister for Schools (Jim Knight): The Government Actuary has reported on the results of his valuation of the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS) as at 31 March 2004. His report, which takes account of the reforms to the TPS that will be introduced on 1 January 2007, including the increase in the contribution rate paid by teachers from 6 per cent. to 6.4 per cent., recommends that, from that date, the employer contribution rate for the TPS should increase from the current rate of 13.5 per cent. to 14.1 per cent.

The principal factor underlying the increase in the contribution rates relates to continuing improvements in life expectancy compared to the assumptions adopted in the previous valuation. The agreed package of TPS reforms will deliver savings on the employer contribution rate of some £280 million a year compared to the contribution that would have been required if the existing scheme provisions had remained in place. This reform package, which includes an agreement on cost sharing between members and employers of any future changes in the contribution rate and a cap of 14 per cent. on the employer rate from the 2008 scheme valuation onwards, should ensure the long term financial sustainability of the TPS.

A copy of the Government Actuary’s report has been placed in the House of Commons Library.


21 Nov 2006 : Column 31WS

Education and Youth Council (13-14 November 2006)

The Minister for Higher Education and Lifelong Learning (Bill Rammell): Anne Lambert, UK Deputy Permanent Representative to the EU, attended the Youth Council on behalf on the UK, I represented the Government at the Education Council.

Ministers discussed the following issues:

Youth

1. The draft resolution on implementing common objectives for young people to promote their active European citizenship was adopted without discussion.

2. Ministers exchanged views on “better knowledge and understanding of Youth”. They agreed that there was a need to support the development of youth policy with independent research based on practical experience. There was agreement that there should be a two-way relationship between policy and practice, with research concentrated in areas where policy decisions were most relevant to young people. The Council also endorsed the setting up of a EU database on youth policies to support implementation and evaluation. The UK tabled a paper, but did not intervene in the discussion.

Modernising Higher Education

3. The Education part of the Council was dominated by a public debate on the EIT(European Institute of Technology) and the wider reform of higher education (HE) in the EU.

4. On the latter, I underlined the crucial importance of the reform process and the supporting role of the EU. I noted that some progress has been made since Hampton Court, but we now need to inject a sense of urgency. Links between business and HE are needed to ensure the right supply of skills and qualifications for the labour market and widening participation. To this end I proposed that a compendium of best practice in modernising universities should be drawn up on the back of the ongoing peer-learning activity between member states. This was supported by the Commission and many member states.

EIT

5. Ministers gave a cautious welcome to the Commission’s recent proposal. For the UK, I said the EIT’s success would depend on its clarity of purpose. The focus on knowledge transfer is welcome. It is now crucial to ensure that the EIT provides value for money; we have concerns about the budget, and want to be sure resources will not be diverted from elsewhere. The Commission hopes the Regulation will be adopted by the end of 2007 and that two Knowledge and Innovation Communities would be up and running by 2010.

Vocational Education and Training

6. The Council adopted Conclusions on enhancing European co-operation in vocational education and training (VET). These will encourage Member States to develop strategies to raise skills levels and improve the quality and attractiveness of vocational training. The informal meeting of Education Ministers on 4-5 December will pursue this theme. The Commission flagged up two
21 Nov 2006 : Column 32WS
forthcoming initiatives: a Communication on adult learning; and a consultation on developing a European Credit Transfer System for VET.

Efficiency and Equity in Education and Training Systems

7. The Council also adopted Conclusions on efficiency and equity in education and training systems. These will encourage member states to develop education policies which produce the best outcomes for all groups in society, including disadvantaged young people. The presidency inserted a reference to member states’ exclusive responsibility for the organisation of the education systems.

European Qualifications Framework

8. The Council agreed a general approach on the draft recommendation on a European Qualifications Framework (EQF). The EQF will give a model for comparing qualifications in different member states and thereby support mobility.

AOB

9. The presidency reported that the recommendations on education Key Competences and a Mobility Charter had been approved by the European Parliament.

The French delegation presented a proposal for the development of a European teaching aid as an introduction to the history of the arts in Europe.

British Overseas Territories

The Minister for Higher Education and Lifelong Learning (Bill Rammell): The UK has a continuing obligation under the United Nations Charter to promote the well-being of the inhabitants of its Overseas Territories, and we are committed under the White Paper “Partnership for Progress and Prosperity—Britain and the Overseas Territories” to ensuring their social and economic development. I am therefore pleased to tell Parliament that in response to representations about students from our Overseas Territories, the Department for Education and Skills will be making changes to our Education (Fees and Awards) Regulations and to The Student Fees (Qualifying Courses and Persons) Regulations from the 2007-08 academic year to allow these students to pay home fees, and not the higher overseas fee rate. This policy change will also apply to students from the overseas territories of Denmark, France and the Netherlands.

ANNEXE A

The specified territories to which the change will apply are:


21 Nov 2006 : Column 33WS

British Overseas Territories

Anguilla

Bermuda

British Antarctic Territory

British Indian Ocean Territory

British Virgin Islands

Cayman Islands

Falkland Islands

Montserrat

Pitcairn Islands

South Georgia & the South Sandwich Isles

St Helena & its Dependencies

Turks & Caicos Islands

Overseas Territories of other EU Member States

Greenland & Faeroe Isles (Denmark)

Netherlands Antilles (Bonaire, Curacao, Saba, St Eustatius and St Marten) and Aruba (Netherlands)

French Possessions

New Caledonia

French Polynesia

Wallis and Futuna

Mayotte

St Pierre et Miquelon

French Southern and Antarctic Territories


21 Nov 2006 : Column 34WS

Education and Skills

Winter Supplementary Estimate 2006-07 (Changes to DEL and Administration Costs Budget)

The Secretary of State for Education and Skills (Alan Johnson): Subject to Parliamentary approval of any necessary Supplementary Estimate, the Department for Education and Skills Departmental Expenditure Limit (DEL), (including the Office for Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools (OFSTED) which has a separate Estimate) will be decreased by £99,618,000 from £59,702,608,000 to £59,602,990,000. The administration cost budget will be increased by £331,000 from £272,230,000 to £272,561,000.

Within the DEL change, the impact on resources and capital is as set out in the following table:

DfESResourcesCapital***
ChangeNew DELOf which: VotedNon-votedChangeNew DELOf which: VotedNon-voted

£'000

'£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

£'000

RfRl

-17,299

51,757,341

34,876,229

16,881,112

12,980

5,839,905

3,377,779

2,462,126

RfR2

-50,775

1,229,143

1,229,143

0

0

426,425

426,425

0

RfR3

-44,524

145,576

145,576

0

0

0

0

0

OFSTED

0

204,000

204,000

0

0

600

600

0

Sub Total

-112,598

53,336,060

36,454,948

16,881,112

12,980

6,266,930

3,804,804

2,462,126

** Of which Admin Budget

331

272,567

272,561

0

0

0

0

0

Near-cash in RDEL

-68,046

52,600,580

35,740,923

16,859,657

0

0

0

0

Depreciation*

1715

-37,399

-11,675

-25,724

0

0

0

0

Total

-110,883

53,298,661

36,443,273

16,855,388

12,980

6,266,930

3,804,804

2,426,126

*Depreciation, which forms part of resource DEL, is excluded from the total DEL, in the table above, since capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting.
** The total of 'Administration budget' and 'Near-cash in resource DEL 'figures may well be greater than total resource DEL, due to the definitions overlapping.
***Capital DEL includes items treated as resource in Estimates and accounts but which are treated as Capital DEL in budgets.

Next Section Index Home Page