29 Nov 2006 : Column 677W

Written Answers to Questions

Wednesday 29 November 2006

Solicitor-General

Magistrates Courts (Clerical Errors)

Mr. Bone: To ask the Solicitor-General what action is available to the Crown Prosecution Service in circumstances where a clerical error by a magistrates court clerk is preventing the re-charge of a person suspected of an offence. [102667]

The Solicitor-General: Clerical errors by a magistrates court clerk do not of themselves prevent the recharging of a suspect. A defendant may, however, challenge the decision to re-charge on the basis that a fair trial is no longer possible.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Air Quality

Stephen Hesford: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of air quality in Wirral West in each year between 2001 and 2005. [103755]

Mr. Bradshaw: Local authorities (LAs) have a duty under Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 to review and assess the current, and likely future, air quality in their areas. The first step of the review and assessment process is an updating and screening assessment (USA), which is to be undertaken by all authorities to identify those matters that have changed since the last round was completed. LAs are expected to undertake the reviews and assessment every three years. Where local authorities consider that one or more of the nationally prescribed air quality objectives for each of the seven pollutants is unlikely to be met by the relevant deadline, they must declare an air quality management area (AQMA), covering the area where the problem is expected. These local authorities must then take action, along with other agencies and organisations, to work towards meeting the air quality objectives.

When the local air quality management system was first introduced in December 1997, local authorities were advised to complete the review and assessment process by December 1999. My Department assessed Wirral's air quality report in October 1999. The report concluded that further investigation was needed in respect of nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter (PM10). Following monitoring and modelling, Wirral concluded from the additional work that they did not need to declare an air quality management area (AQMA).

The second round of reviews and assessments started in 2003 and local authorities had to submit
29 Nov 2006 : Column 678W
updating and screening assessments (USA) by the end of May 2003, and were expected to submit either a detailed assessment or a progress report by April 2004 and April 2005 respectively. Wirral submitted their USA in October 2003 and a progress report in both November 2004 and February 2006. They concluded that there was no need to proceed to a detailed assessment or declare an AQMA.

The third round of review and assessments has now started and local authorities were asked to submit new USAs by end of April 2006. We received Wirral's report in May 2006. Our consultants have assessed the report and agreed that there is no need for Wirral to carry out further work in respect of any of the seven pollutants.

Biofuels

Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs why the UK’s biofuels targets are set by volume; and which other EU countries set biofuels inclusion targets by volume. [105909]

Dr. Ladyman: I have been asked to reply.

The UK is exceptional among EU member states in setting its biofuel sales targets on a volume rather than an energy basis. We have chosen to do it this way for simplicity’s sake. Transport fuels are sold and taxed on a volume basis rather than an energy content basis: motorists buy fuel by the litre rather than by the megajoule. We will be consulting in early 2007 on whether, in the longer term, volume-based targets for renewable transport fuels remain appropriate, or whether we might move towards some other form of target such as a carbon-saving target instead.

Bovine Tuberculosis

Daniel Kawczynski: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he is taking to reduce the incidence of bovine tuberculosis in England. [105793]

Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when he will announce measures which may be taken to control bovine tuberculosis in high incidence areas. [106217]

Mr. Bradshaw: In line with the ‘Government strategic framework for the sustainable control of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in Great Britain’ the Government are working in partnership with interested parties to reduce the geographic spread of bTB and achieve a sustained reduction in high incidence areas. In the last year, the Government have introduced new, tailored policies to reflect regional variation in disease risk (for example, pre-movement testing and the more extensive use of gamma interferon).

Farmers also have a crucial role to play in reducing the risks of introducing bTB into their herd not only by complying with statutory policies designed to limit the spread of the disease but by ensuring they apply good bio-security measures and suitable husbandry practices.


29 Nov 2006 : Column 679W

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what discussions he has had with the Northern Ireland Department of Agriculture and Rural Development on lessons learned from the recent false BSE test in Northern Ireland. [104275]

Mr. Bradshaw: The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development in Northern Ireland is undertaking a thorough investigation into events surrounding the release into the food chain of an over-30-month (OTM) bovine animal which was not tested for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE). Once the report from this investigation is available, the OTM Implementation Review Group, set up by the Food Standards Agency, will consider and make recommendations on any lessons learned in Northern Ireland which should be applied to the OTM testing system throughout the UK.

Domestic Rubbish

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what representations his Department has received calling for the introduction of variable rate charging for domestic rubbish. [104068]

Mr. Bradshaw: Variable charging for household waste was strongly supported in a range of responses to the consultation on the Review of the Waste Strategy, particularly by environmental groups and local authorities. Respondents argued that charging would reduce waste and increase recycling rates, an important element in tackling climate change.

A summary of responses to the consultation on the Review of the Waste Strategy is available on the DEFRA website at:

The Department has also received a range of letters, emails and parliamentary questions on this subject.

Fly-tipping

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment his Department has made of the possible reasons for the rise in fly-tipping offences measured by the Flycapture database. [103918]

Mr. Bradshaw: The number of local authorities in England submitting regular returns of fly-tipping incidents to Flycapture, the national fly-tipping database, has significantly increased from 79.5 per cent. in April 2004 when the database was first launched, to 92 per cent. in 2005-06; so one reason for the increase might simply be better reporting.

Over time, the database will help us build up a more accurate picture of illegally dumped waste, as well as providing a useful management tool for local authorities in tackling the problem.


29 Nov 2006 : Column 680W

Lyme Bay Reef System

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what measures he proposes to take to protect the Lyme Bay reef system; [105989]

(2) on what criteria the reef areas within Lyme Bay were selected for protection. [105990]

Mr. Bradshaw: I have considered very seriously the action needed to protect the pink sea fans, ross corals and sunset corals, and to protect other parts of Lyme Bay’s important marine environment.

My officials and I have worked closely over recent months with English Nature (now Natural England) and representatives of the fishing industry to reach a compromise on the areas of the bay to be closed. After due consideration of all of the evidence produced, we concluded that a zonal solution, backed by independent scientific assessment and advice, was the most proportionate way to provide the necessary protection for those areas of Lyme Bay of greatest nature conservation and marine biodiversity importance.

For pink sea fans, this solution affords seven times the protection that had existed under the previous voluntary agreement. The protection zones cover over 92 per cent. of the known pink sea fan sites in Lyme Bay. We have considered how best to give statutory effect to the voluntary closure and will be consulting on a suite of possible alternative measures early in the new year.

Mayor of London

Mr. Love: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what factors he took into account when deciding not to extend the Mayor of London’s statutory powers to include Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1990; what assessment he has made of the impact of the decision on preparations for the 2012 Olympics; and if he will make a statement. [104325]

Mr. Bradshaw: The Government took into account a number of factors when making its decision on the waste element of the review of the powers and responsibilities of the Mayor of London and the Greater London Authority. These included environmental benefits, costs, risks and views of interested parties. The Government did not consider extending the Mayor’s powers to include Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 as a separate issue in the review.

No assessment has been made of the impact of the decision on preparations for the 2012 Olympics.

Recycling

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether waste recycled at a county council amenity site in a two-tier area counts towards a borough council's Best Value performance indicators for recycling. [104074]


29 Nov 2006 : Column 681W

Mr. Bradshaw: Authorities (including London boroughs and metropolitan boroughs) should include the tonnage of household waste collected from civic amenity sites for the purposes of calculating best value performance indicators only if they have legal responsibility for the sites.

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) why home composting is not (a) recorded and (b) rewarded in Best Value performance indicators; [104083]

(2) why recycling trade waste is not counted in Best Value Performance Indicators for recycling. [104108]

Mr. Bradshaw: The current best value performance indicators (BVPI) on recycling, BVPI 82a and BVPI 82b, measure each local authority's achievement against its statutory performance standards for recycling and composting household waste only.

Home composting is currently excluded from the definition of household waste for the purposes of calculating BVPI 82b, as there is, as yet, no auditable methodology for determining how much household waste is treated in this way.

However, the impact of home composting is reflected in other BVPI indicators. Encouraging the householder to home compost will reduce total household waste arisings which will contribute positively towards BVPI 84 (kilograms of household waste collected per head of population).

A recent White Paper, published by the Department for Communities and Local Government, sets out a new framework for local authority performance from 2008-09 with a single set of national outcome indicators (agreed through Comprehensive Spending Review) and fewer targets. We aim to announce options for future waste targets and indicators in the new year.

Single Farm Payments

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which countries in the European Union will be implementing the proposed reductions in single farm payments. [101002]

Barry Gardiner: The Commission will be obliged to propose a reduction in direct payments due to farmers in all EU15 member states if budget forecasts suggest that expenditure will come within €300,000 of the Pillar One ceiling under the terms of the so-called “financial discipline mechanism” introduced as part of the June 2003 CAP reform.

Swill Feeding

Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether his Department has any outstanding requests for (a) information and (b) opinion from the Parliamentary Ombudsman arising from her investigation into the ban on swill feeding. [105997]


29 Nov 2006 : Column 682W

Mr. Bradshaw: We have no outstanding requests for information or our views relating to the Parliamentary Ombudsman’s investigations into the ban on swill feeding.

Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when his Department received a draft of the report by the Parliamentary Ombudsman on the ban on swill feeding; what response he has made to it; and when that response was made. [105998]

Mr. Bradshaw: Defra received a draft of the factual contents of the report on 9 February 2006 and replied with comments on the factual accuracy of the draft report on 28 February 2006.

Tidal Power

Paul Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what new initiatives he plans to introduce to encourage the use of tidal power. [106058]

Malcolm Wicks: The Government already have in place a number of initiatives that encourage the development of tidal power.

The Government's main mechanism for supporting renewable energy is the renewables obligation (RO). The RO provides a guaranteed market for a range of renewable energy, including tidal power.

In addition, around £16 million has been committed to support research and development of tidal power technologies under the DTI technology programme and a further £50 million has been made available under the DTI's marine renewables deployment fund to support the first larger-scale pre-commercial grid-connected wave and tidal-stream demonstration projects.

The Government announced in the energy review report their intention to consider ‘banding’ the RO so as to give more support to emerging energy technologies and are currently consulting on this approach. They also announced that the DTI together with the Welsh Assembly Government, are working with the Sustainable Development Commission, the South West Regional Development Agency and other key interested parties to explore the issues arising on the tidal resource in the UK, including the Severn estuary, including potential costs and benefits of development using a range of tidal technologies and their public acceptability. The study is due to report in June 2007.

Waste Disposal

Martin Horwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what proportion of waste was taken to landfill in each year since 1997; what assessment has been made of the impact of landfill waste on the environment; and if he will make a statement. [103813]


29 Nov 2006 : Column 683W

Mr. Bradshaw: The following table gives the percentage of municipal waste sent to landfill in England from 1996-97 to 2005-06:

Percentage

1996-97

84

1997-98

85

1998-99

82

1999-2000

80

2000-01

79

2001-02

78

2002-03

75

2003-04

72

2004-05

67

2005-06

62


Next Section Index Home Page