Previous Section Index Home Page

30 Nov 2006 : Column 832W—continued

Civil Servants

Mr. Hayes: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what changes have occurred to (a) the number of civil servants employed and (b) the number of external consultants employed since the publication of the Gershon Review. [104513]

Mr. Timms: The Gershon Review was published in July 2004. The number of people employed in the civil service as measured by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) in June 2004 (the closest available figure to July 2004) was 570,000. By June 2006 this figure had fallen by 12,000 to 558,000.

ONS Statistics reflect a number of statistical and classification changes. For example, in April 2005 12,000 staff in the magistrates court service were transferred from local government into the civil service.

These civil service statistics are published by the ONS in their Public Sector Employment Statistics First Release. Following is a link to the latest version of this publication:

The Government remain on track to meet the work force reduction target set out in the 2004 Gershon Review of a gross reduction of 84,150 posts and a net reduction in posts of 70,600 after re-allocations to the frontline. Departments have made good progress towards their targets with 54,963 gross reductions and 45,551 net reductions in total reported to the end of September 2006.

Data on the number of external consultants employed by the Government is not collected centrally.

Departmental Expenditure

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how much was paid in staff expenses in (a) his Department and (b) its agencies in each of the last three financial years; [102770]


30 Nov 2006 : Column 833W

(2) how much was paid in expenses for (a) his special advisers and (b) his Council of Economic Advisers in each of the last three financial years. [102817]

John Healey: Departments’ accounting systems primarily report spending by the classification of the spending, rather than the source. Therefore information on the totals for staff expenses claims could be provided only at disproportionate cost.


30 Nov 2006 : Column 834W

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the total cost was of (a) fixed line telephone bills and (b) mobile telephone bills in (i) his Department and (ii) each of its agencies in each of the last five years. [102871]

John Healey: The available figures are set out in the following table.

£000
Department/agency 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

HM Treasury

Both fixed and mobile

(1)

1,592

1,416

1,796

1,558

Debt Management Office

Fixed

(1)

80

94

135

103

Mobile

(1)

2

4

5

4

Office of Government Commerce

Fixed

(1)

392

434

523

380

Mobile

(1)

82

64

87

74

OGCbuying.solutions

Fixed

(1)

(1)

(1)

67

65

Mobile

(1)

(1)

(1)

28

31

Valuation Office Agency

Fixed

(1)

1,880

1,162

1,587

1,236

Mobile

(1)

30

57

139

135

HM Revenue and Customs

Fixed

18,160

20,454

23,742

21,945

(2)13,134

Mobile

2,753

2,576

2,698

4,041

3,595

Royal Mint

Fixed

138

147

159

(3)209

75

Mobile

11

15

24

31

38

National Savings and Investments

Fixed

65

109

104

29

51

Mobile

7

7

6

7

11

Office of National Statistics

Fixed

434

457

726

870

835

Mobile

8

95

82

98

258

Government Actuary’s Department

Fixed

35

36

38

39

40

Mobile

0

0

0

0

4

(1) Figures could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
(2) The decrease in landline charges for HMRC in 2005-06 reflects the transfer of responsibility for maintenance and service of the telephone system to the Department’s IT partner.
(3) The high fixed line charge for the Royal Mint in 2004-05 related to a settlement in respect of 0845 numbers which had not been charged by BT over the previous three years. The reduction in 2005-06 was due in part to the more competitive marketplace and in part to more efficient use of the charging system by the Mint.

Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what public relations companies were employed by his Department in each year between 1997 and 2002. [102872]

John Healey: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave him on 24 July 2006, Official Report, column 1064W.

Mr. Swire: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much was spent by his Department on television advertisements in the last year for which figures are available. [104441]

John Healey: In the financial year 2005-06, HM Treasury spent £2,916,350 on television advertising on the stakeholder savings initiative.

DHL

Anne Milton: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much his Department paid to DHL in each financial year between 1997-98 and 2005-06. [104175]

John Healey: Information on payments made prior to 2002-03 could be obtained only at disproportionate cost due to a change in accounting system in that year. Payments made to DHL in each financial year since 2002-03 were:

Amount (£)

2002-03

0

2003-04

117.43

2004-05

139.51

2005-06

2,023.73


Economic Statistics (City of York)

Hugh Bayley: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many VAT registered businesses there were in City of York (a) parliamentary constituency and (b) council area in each year since 1992. [106678]

Dawn Primarolo: HM Revenue and Customs does not publish geographical analyses of its data on VAT registrations. Information on business enterprises registered for VAT by local authority is available via the Small Business Service website:


30 Nov 2006 : Column 835W

Government Resources and Accounts Act

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if HM Treasury will make an Order under section 25 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 for the accounts of the regional chambers to be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General. [104309]

John Healey: Regional assemblies produce accounts that are audited as part of the ‘Accountable Body’ arrangements in place to satisfy grant funding requirements from the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Grant funding is included in DCLG’s resource accounts which are audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Given these arrangements, there is no need for the Treasury to require further scrutiny or make an Order under section 25 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000.

High-level Group on Financial Services

Mr. Mark Field: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will publish the minutes of the last meeting of the High-level Group on Financial Services. [103874]

Ed Balls: Outcomes of the last meeting of the High-level Group on Financial Services can be found in the Press Notice 77/06 released by the Treasury on 18 October 2006.

Mr. Mark Field: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer who the members are of (a) the High-level Group on Financial Services and (b) each of its sub-committees. [103875]

Ed Balls: The names of the members of the High-level Group on Financial Services can be found in the Press Notice 77/06 released by the Treasury on 18 October 2006.

There are currently no sub-committees under the High-level Group on Financial Services.

Mr. Mark Field: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer when the next meeting of the High-level Group on Financial Services is planned to take place. [103876]

Ed Balls: The next meeting of the High-level Group on Financial Services will be held on 10 May 2007.

Household Statistics

Mr. Laws: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what proportion of household costs were accounted for by fuel costs for each income decile in the latest year for which information is available; and if he will make a statement. [102946]

Malcolm Wicks: I have been asked to reply.

The latest figures available are 2004-05 based on Office for National Statistics Expenditure and Food Survey. UK data are shown in the following table.


30 Nov 2006 : Column 836W
Income Decile Fuel costs as a percentage of total costs

1

6

2

6

3

5

4

4

5

4

6

4

7

3

8

3

9

3

10

2

All

3


Next Section Index Home Page