The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo): I have completed the annual review under section 141 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. I propose the following changes to take effect from 6 April 2007. These rates and limits will also apply to national insurance contributions in Northern Ireland.
In line with the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992, the lower earnings limit for primary class 1 contributions is to be raised to £87 a week. It is set at the level of the basic state pension for a single person from April 2007 and rounded down to the nearest pound.
The primary and secondary thresholds for class 1 contributions will continue to be aligned with the weekly amount of the income tax personal allowance, which will be increased to £5,225 from April 2007. The primary and secondary thresholds will therefore be increased to £100 a week. This means that no tax or class 1 contributions will be paid on earnings below this level.
Self-employed people with earnings below the annual small earnings exception can apply to be exempted from paying class 2 contributions. This limit will be raised by £170 to £4,635 in line with prices.
The annual lower profits limit for liability to class 4 contributions will increase to £5,225 a year (in line with the income tax personal allowance). The upper profits limit will increase by £1,300 to £34,840 to maintain the link with employees earnings liable to class 1 contributions.
The special rate of class 2 contributions for share fishermen, which allows them to build entitlement to contributory Jobseekers Allowance in addition to the other contributory benefits available to the self-employed, will increase in line with prices to £2.85 a week.
The special rate of class 2 contributions for volunteer development workers, which entitles them to
the full range of contributory benefits, will be increased by 15p to £4.35 in line with the statutory formula of 5 per cent. of the primary class 1 lower earnings limit.
To ensure that the Fund can maintain a prudent working balance throughout the coming year, and in accordance with section 2 (2) of the Social Security Act 1993, I propose to prescribe that the maximum Treasury grant which may be made available to the fund in 2007-08 shall not exceed 2 per cent. of the estimated benefit expenditure for that year. Similar provision will be made in respect of the Northern Ireland National Insurance Fund.
I shall be laying a draft re-rating order before Parliament in due course. This will accompany a report by the Government Actuary to myself and my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions which we shall jointly present to Parliament.
|National Insurance Contributions, Proposed Re-rating, April 2007|
|(1,2) See the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions order The Social Security (Reduced Rates of Class 1 Contributions, Rebates and Minimum Contributions) Order 2006|
The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo): In the 2005 pre-Budget report, the Government announced a series of reforms to improve the tax credit system by increasing certainty for claimants. One of these changes was automatic limits on the rates of recovery where awards are adjusted in-year following a reported change.
From February 2006, HMRC has widened the availability of additional payments to claimants experiencing hardship following an in-year adjustment to their tax credit payments. Making this process automatic has proved to involve significant changes to the IT system and, after extensive testing, HMRC has concluded that it is not possible to make a risk-free introduction of these automatic limits to the original timetable. Introducing fully automatic limits remains a key priority, and from April 2007 I have instructed HMRC to introduce an IT solution to ensure that claimants will benefit from reduced rates of recovery without them having to ask for this service.
Meanwhile HMRC will do more to ensure that claimants can get access to the reduced rates now and anyone who qualifies and contacts HMRC concerning their end of year adjustment will be given payments to ensure the reduced rates of recovery apply. HMRC have already taken steps to ensure that this facility is brought to claimants' attention. Furthermore, starting in January, HMRC will introduce an enhanced manual process to identify cases where a restriction is appropriate and apply a restricted rate of recovery without the claimant having to ask for this. In the majority of cases the restriction will take effect at the same time as their payments are adjusted to take account of the reduced entitlement, thus achieving the same effect as the automatic restrictions.
The Government will continue to make improvements to the tax credit system, including those announced in the 2005 pre-Budget report, while minimising the risk of disruption to claimants. To minimise those risks and ensure that some of the most vulnerable families are protected, the Government will not begin migration of the remaining IS/JSA recipients with children to the child tax credit in 2007. In addition, HMRC is putting in place special arrangements for a small proportion of claimants who may experience disruption in their payments following the processing of changes in their circumstances, and will update the IT system in April 2007 to prevent this.
Delivering a good service to tax credit claimants is of course, the key priority for HMRC. They are committed to implementing the package of measures announced in the 2005 pre-Budget report, and to delivering a high quality service to claimants.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Mr. David Lammy):
The provision for the Government indemnity scheme is made by the National Heritage Act 1980. The scheme facilitates public access to loans of works of art and other objects for public display made to museums, galleries and other such institutions by private owners and non-national institutions. It does this by indemnifying lenders against loss or damage to their
loan. Loans covered by the scheme must be for public benefit. The scheme also covers loans of such objects for study purposes within borrowing institutions where this would contribute materially to the public's understanding or appreciation of the loan. Examples of this are enhancing interpretation or explanation to the public of objects or bringing into the public domain, the conclusions of any study.
In the six month period ended 30 September 2006, a total of 1,374 undertakings were given to indemnify objects on loan to national and non-national institutions under section 16 by the relevant Departments. The Museums, Libraries and Archives Council (MLA), which manages the scheme on behalf of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, issued a total of 1,129 undertakings to national museums and 218 undertakings to non-national museums in England, the Scottish Executive Education Department issued six undertakings and the National Assembly for Wales issued two. Finally, the Government Art Collection issued 19 in the same period.
The value of contingent liabilities in respect of undertakings given at any time under section 16 and which remained outstanding as at 30 September 2006 for national museums are £2,634,357,427 and are £1,291,128,448 for non-nationals in England. The value of section 16 contingent liabilities as at 30 September 2006 for the Scottish Executive Education Department are £23,322,208; £33,409,197 for the National Assembly for Wales, and £2,531,500 for the Government Art Collection.
The value of non-statutory undertakings given to Her Majesty in respect of loans from the Royal Collection and which remained outstanding as at 30 September 2006 are £588,211,857; £36,821,000 for non-national museums issued by the MLA, £25,000 for the Government art collections and £15,000 for the Scottish Executive Education Department.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Barry Gardiner): In July this year I announced that I had asked the Natural England Board to come forward with its recommendations on coastal access to the Government before the end of December.
I met the chair and chief executive of Natural England last week and following the meeting I have asked the Natural England Board to do some further work in order to finalise its advice. I have now agreed that the board should come forward with its final advice and recommendations on coastal access by end February 2007. As a result I would expect that there will be a delay in the issue of the public consultation document from the previous date that I have announced of early 2007.
The Minister for Europe (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): The General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) will be held on 11-12 December in Brussels. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and I will represent the UK.
Germany will present the Council with a combined programme covering the German, Portuguese and Slovenian presidencies. This programme is divided into three parts: the strategic framework, specific priorities for each presidency and a comprehensive programme of issues expected to be covered during the 18-month period.
The Council will discuss the Commission's progress reports, published on 8 November. These review progress made by each of the Western Balkans countries in meeting the conditions of the stabilisation and association process.
We expect the Council to discuss a forward-leaning package of practical support which could be introduced if an acceptable national unity government emerges, such as building Palestinian institutional capacity.
The Council will discuss Afghanistan at a time of increasing EU activity. A European security and defence policy (ESDP) fact-finding mission is in Afghanistan examining the possibility for a full ESDP
mission on policing and rule of law in 2007. This is intended to complement Italian and German efforts on justice sector reform and policing. The UK is a strong supporter of increased EU activity in Afghanistan and is working closely with partners to achieve this. We want the mission to take a strategic and coordinated approach, working closely with the Afghan Government and the other donors, and looking at links right across the justice sector, including counter-narcotic policing and justice institutions.
At the NATO summit in Riga, France proposed the establishment of an international contact group on Afghanistan. Heads of Government agreed at Riga that the NATO Secretary General should revert with a proposal for a contact group to the North Atlantic Council, but we expect this also to be raised at the GAERC.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|