Previous Section Index Home Page

11 Dec 2006 : Column 798W—continued

Departmental Expenditure

Mr. Swire: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much was spent by his Department on television advertisements in the last year for which figures are available. [104439]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The Department had no spend on television advertising in 2005-06.


11 Dec 2006 : Column 799W

Alan Duncan: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much funding his Department gave to the (a) Hearing Aid Council, (b) British Hallmarking Council, (c) Manufacturing Advisory Service, (d) Industrial Development Advisory Board, (e) Ethnic Minority Business Forum and (f) Equal Opportunities Commission in each of the last five years; and how much has been provided to each body in 2006-07. [106927]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The Department has not provided any funding to the British Hallmark Council in the last five years or in the current year.

Industrial Development Advisory Board and Ethnic Minority Business Forum are advisory non-departmental public bodies which do not directly receive funding from the Department. However, they are provided with secretariat support from the Department, which also meets the costs of members' honoraria and expenses where appropriate.

The Manufacturing Advisory Service is not constituted as a separate entity. It is a programme operated by the Department, expenditure on which has been as follows:

Expenditure (£ million)

2006-07

6.0

2005-06

6.0

2004-05

2.0

2003-04

4.7

2002-03

4.5

2001-02

3.0


For the Hearing Aid Council, no funding has been given in 2006-07. Funding for previous years is set out in the annual Public Bodies Directory for the respective years; see website link

The Equal Opportunities Commission has since April this year been the responsibility of the Department for Communities and Local Government. Funding for previous years is set out in the annual Public Bodies Directory for the respective years.

Departmental Responsibilities

Mrs. Villiers: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much his Department spent on statistics relating to the work of his Department in each of the last five years. [107278]

Jim Fitzpatrick: There is no definition of the term “statistics relating to the work of the department” and no centrally held information on either the volume or costs of statistics published each year on this basis.

Estimates for the annual costs of National Statistics are contained in the relevant National Statistics Annual Report and Accounts, which are available on the National Statistics website at: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=1051. Copies are also available in the Libraries of the House for the reference of Members.

The last year these were produced was 2004-05.


11 Dec 2006 : Column 800W

Departmental Staff

Mr. Roger Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many (a) marketing officers, (b) communications officers and (c) press officers are employed in his Department; and what the total expenditure on communications for his Department was on (i) Government Information and Communication Service staff and (ii) other (A) press officers, (B) special advisers and (C) staff in the last year for which figures are available. [104357]

Jim Fitzpatrick: 69.7 (full time equivalent - FTE) communications staff were employed centrally within DTI in 2005-06, as follows:

FTE

Press

14

Marketing

22

Internal and Electronic Communications

15

Other Communications

14.7

Administration

4


The pay bill for those staff during the same period was £2.9 million.

Information on staff numbers in communications elsewhere in the Department is not held centrally and could be supplied only at disproportionate cost.

The time spent by special advisers on communications work cannot be disaggregated from their other duties.

EC External Trade: Africa

Anne Snelgrove: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what steps he is taking to ensure that bilateral trade negotiations between the EU and countries in Africa prioritise the development needs of the latter. [107506]

Jim Fitzpatrick: Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) are currently being negotiated between the European Union and African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries. These agreements will replace the trading arrangements established through the Cotonou Agreement between the EU and the ACP, which will lapse at the end of 2007.

The UK recognises that trade can be an important driver of development and we are acting to ensurethat EPAs promote long-term development. The Government published a position paper on EPAs in March 2005. This states that, among other things, we will push for duty-free quota-free access for all ACP countries to the EU, simple and liberal Rules of Origin and that ACP should have maximum flexibility over their own market opening.

The UK has expended considerable effort over the last year to ensure that the review of EPAs negotiations currently taking place provides a significant opportunity for the ACP to raise any concerns. Ministers take every opportunity to meet with ACP Ministers, negotiators and representatives in order to listen to any concerns they may have. We continue to work with our EU partners and other member states to ensure that the ACP should be in the driving seat of their own reform.


11 Dec 2006 : Column 801W

Electricity Supply

Alan Duncan: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment his Department has made of the expected electricity plant margin (a) in each year between 2006 and 2009 and (b) after 2009. [103230]

Mr. Darling: The expected electricity plant margin for winter 2006-07 as published in national grid's winter report


11 Dec 2006 : Column 802W

is 22 per cent.

The best assessment of the expected electricity plant margin over the years 2007 out to 2013 is illustrated in the following table, taken from national grid's Seven Year Statement of May 2006

This gives projections against three generation scenarios, reflecting the extent to which proposed new transmission contracted plant does, in the event, proceed to completion, provided both by customers and national grid itself.

Percentage plant margin (SYS( 1) update, May 2006) 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13

Customer based—SYS(1)

21.3

22.6

33.0

35.6

43.6

46.6

46.2

Customer based—C(2)

21.3

20.1

21.5

20.1

17.1

15.9

14.5

Customer based—E,UC(3)

21.3

18.3

18.2

16.7

13.9

12.7

11.3

NGET base—SYS(1)

22.6

25.7

37.1

40.3

49.2

52.8

53.0

NGET base—C(2)

22.6

23.2

25.2

24.2

21.7

20.8

19.8

NGET based—E,UC(3)

22.6

21.3

21.8

20.8

18.3

17.4

16.5

(1) In addition to all existing plant: plant where an appropriate contract is in place for connection to and use of the transmission system, less notified reductions in capacity from plant closures or plant being mothballed
(2 )In addition to all existing plant: plant that has obtained consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act and section 14 of the Energy Act 1976, less notified reductions in capacity from plant closures or plant being mothballed
(3 )In addition to all existing plant which is actually under construction, less notified reductions in capacity from plant closures or plant being mothballed.
Source:
National grid

Employment Agencies

Ian Stewart: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many employment agencies have been prosecuted in the last 12 months for breaches of the (a) Employment Agencies Act 1973 and (b) Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Business Regulations 2003, broken down by offence. [105559]

Jim Fitzpatrick: In the last 12 months, the Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate has brought one successful prosecution. This case related to a person breaching Section 3 of the Employment Agencies Act 1973, operating an employment agency while prohibited. There have been no prosecutions under the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003.

Energy: Small Businesses

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what length of cooling-off period energy suppliers are legally obliged to offer small businesses which agree to energy supply contracts. [104598]

Malcolm Wicks: Suppliers are not required, either in general consumer law or the regulations governing the marketing of gas and electricity, to offer a cooling-off period to non-domestic customers when offering a supply contract. Non-domestic customers, who have a complaint against a supplier that they have been unable to resolve, may pursue it through the statutory gas and electricity consumer body, Energywatch, or through the courts.

Jim Dobbin: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what (a) regulatory and (b) self-regulatory protection is afforded to small business consumers in the (i) energy and (ii) fixed-line telecommunications markets. [104599]

Malcolm Wicks: GB energy markets are regulated by Ofgem, whose principal statutory objective is to protect the interest of consumers, including small businesses. Ofgem's main role is to issue and enforce licences by which participation in the GB energy sector is required. Attached to these licences are various industry and best practice codes to ensure all users get the best deal. Energywatch, the statutory consumer body, can investigate complaints on behalf of electricity and gas users.

The regulation of the fixed line telecommunications market is the responsibility of Ofcom. Ofcom's principal statutory duty is to further the interests of consumers, including small businesses. Ofcom imposes conditions on fixed line providers to ensure all users get the best possible deal from the market and there are also various industry codes in place to protect the interests of users. In addition Ofcom requires that all fixed line providers must be members of dispute resolution schemes, which can investigate complaints on behalf of users, including small businesses.

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what recent discussions he has had with
11 Dec 2006 : Column 803W
(a) Ofgem and (b) energy suppliers on the level of regulatory protection afforded to small businesses in the energy market. [107717]

Malcolm Wicks: The Department has regular meetings with Ofgem and suppliers, at which a range of issues are discussed. As both my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State and Ofgem share a statutory principal objective of protecting the interests of consumers, including small businesses, consumer protection is at the heart of energy regulatory policy. Specifically, I recently met intermediaries representing suppliers to the industrial and commercial market at which a broad agenda was addressed.

Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the level of regulatory protection afforded to small businesses in the energy market; and if he will make a statement. [107718]

Malcolm Wicks: GB energy markets are regulated by Ofgem, whose main role is to issue and enforce licences by which participation in the GB energy sector is required. Attached to these licences are various industry and best practice codes to ensure all users get the best deal. Ofgem’s principal statutory objective is to protect the interest of consumers, including small businesses. As such, GB customers are well protected by the current regulatory regime. There is also the statutory consumer body, Energywatch, which can investigate complaints on behalf of electricity and gas users.

Farepak

Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how much has been collected in fees by the Farepak administrator; at what hourly rate fees are charged for a (a) partner and (b) (i) senior and (ii) junior members of staff; how much revenue has been generated through telephone charges from creditors; what estimate he has made of the final fees of the administrator; and if he will make a statement. [104619]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The administrators have not yet charged their fees to this case and the legislation does not require any account to be prepared until after they have been in office for six months. However details of the administrators’ charge-out rates are likely to be included in the report to creditors which will be issued in January.

Neither my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State nor I are in a position to estimate the amount of fees that may become payable in this case.

In most cases, the general body of creditors determine whether the remuneration should be based on a percentage of the value of assets dealt with by the administrators or their time costs. It is possible for the court to reduce the amount of remuneration where creditors claim that it is excessive.

With regard to cost of telephone inquiries, the administrators had to set up a specific call centre to deal with the large volume of inquiries about this case. I am advised that the cost of the calls is purely to cover the costs of the call centre and will not result in any “profit” accruing to the administrators.


Next Section Index Home Page