Written Answers to Questions

Monday 18 December 2006

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Animal Welfare

Mr. MacDougall: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many people have been prosecuted for cruelty to animals in (a) England and (b) Wales in each of the last 10 years. [107331]

Mr. Bradshaw [holding answer 4 December 2006]: The following table shows the number of persons proceeded against at magistrates courts for offences relating to animal cruelty and neglect in England and Wales, 1996 to 2005(1).

England Wales Total

1996

1,010

146

1,156

1997

1,127

151

1,278

1998

1,168

150

1,318

1999

1,081

134

1,215

2000

1,110

122

1,232

2001

1,026

72

1,098

2002

1,022

98

1,120

2003

1,005

81

1,086

2004

1,013

81

1,094

2005

1,104

93

1,197

Notes:
1. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.
2. Staffordshire police force were only able to supply a sample of data for magistrates courts proceedings covering one full week in each quarter for 2000. Estimates based on this sample are included in the figures, as they are considered sufficiently robust at this high level of analysis.
3. Over this period the majority of prosecutions were for cruelty to animals under the Protection of Animals Act 1911.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans he has for a new animal welfare label. [109307]

Mr. Bradshaw: The draft Animal Welfare Delivery Strategy proposes that improving the clarity and consistency of information on welfare provenance provided to consumers could be a positive step. We are seeking views on this and other proposals in the draft strategy as part of the current public consultation. Detailed actions and commitments will be developed and agreed with interested parties as part of an Action Plan, to be published separately.


18 Dec 2006 : Column 1434W

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what factors underlay his Department's decision to recommend a move away from a legislative approach towards an approach based on the delivery of outcomes through other means in the consultation on the Animal Welfare Delivery Strategy. [109323]

Mr. Bradshaw: As the draft Animal Welfare Delivery Strategy recognises, there is a significant body of European and domestic welfare legislation in place, and the available evidence suggests that this has been successful at improving measurable standards of welfare in the UK. However, the evidence also points to areas where welfare problems continue. The draft strategy proposes a new approach to delivery in order to make progress in these areas. It will continue to be the Government's role to enforce appropriate baseline standards of welfare through regulation.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether he plans to support the European Commission's proposal to extend the length of time for the ban on the import of captive live birds. [109324]

Mr. Bradshaw: As the Prime Minister wrote in his letter to the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds on 5 December, the UK intends to press other member states and the European Commission to extend indefinitely the ban on the commercial import of wild birds, with exceptions for recognised international conservation programmes. This would protect both human and animal health, while benefiting the welfare of wild birds.

Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what criteria he took into account in setting the minimum cage measurements for the transportation of animals; and whether the measurements comply with International Air Transport Association guidelines. [109345]

Mr. Bradshaw: Minimum space allowances for the transport of farmed livestock, horses and poultry are set for road, sea and air transport in Council Directive 91/628/EEC on the protection of animals during transport. These, along with other requirements of the directive, are implemented in Great Britain by the Welfare of Animals (Transport) Order 1997. The same space allowances are contained in the superseding European Union (EU) Regulation 1/2005 on the protection of animals during transport which apply from 5 January 2007. Recommendations from the EU scientific committees (now the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare) were used as the basis for the space allowances. Detailed space allowances are not prescribed for non-farmed species so only general provisions apply. These require sufficient floor area and height appropriate to the animal size and the intended journey.

Both the directive and the new regulation require that for air transport animals are transported in pens or stalls appropriate for the species and which comply with the International Air Transport Association (IATA) Live Animal Regulations (LARs).


18 Dec 2006 : Column 1435W

Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what liaison there was between different divisions in his Department in drawing up the (a) animal health and welfare strategy and (b) first indicators on animal welfare. [109392]

Mr. Bradshaw: I assume that by “first indicatorson animal welfare” the hon. Member means those proposed in the evidence base that accompanied the publication of the animal health and welfare strategyin 2004.

All the divisions with an interest in animal health and welfare were involved in the development of the strategy, the evidence base and the indicators.

Biodiversity

Gregory Barker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many local area agreements have been developed which incorporate the protection or enhancement of biodiversity; and if he will make a statement. [109705]

Barry Gardiner: To date, both the first and the second rounds of local area agreements (LAAs)have been signed off. DEFRA's analysis of thesecond round of LAAs has found that 16 out of the66 authorities negotiating in this round incorporated an outcome focussing on the protection and enhancement of biodiversity.

We do not currently have any information on the number of authorities that included biodiversity outcomes in the first round of LAAs. For the current third round, my officials have told me that a number of authorities are currently in the process of developing outcomes focused on the protection and enhancement of biodiversity. We will wait to see how these progress.

Biofuels

Mr. Spellar: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment his Department has made of the effect on biodiversity in the tropics of the use of palm oil in biofuel production. [108251]

Ian Pearson: The Government have not made an assessment of the effect of palm oil production for biofuel on biodiversity, but work has been carried out on the effects of palm oil production on the local environment. One of the Government's key objectives in this sector is to ensure that biofuel production and development is environmentally sustainable. That is why the Government are developing an environmental assurance scheme as an integral part of the Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation (RTFO). This will require all obligated companies to report on the greenhouse gas balance and wider environmental impacts of their biofuels. The reports will include details of the previous use of the land on which the biofuel feedstocks were grown, and the impacts on biodiversity of growing those feedstocks. This will encourage companies to supply biofuels which deliver the maximum greenhouse gas savings with the minimum environmental impact. It will also ensure that we can monitor the impact of both imported and domestically-sourced biofuels.


18 Dec 2006 : Column 1436W

Climate Change

Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what the average annual rainfall was in (a) Ely and (b) Cambridgeshire in each of the last 20 years; [108393]

(2) what the annual average temperature was of (a) Ely and (b) Cambridgeshire in each of the last20 years; [108394]

(3) what the average annual hours of sunshine were in (a) Ely and (b) Cambridgeshire in each of the last 20 years. [108395]

Ian Pearson: The following table shows the rainfall, mean temperature and hours of sunshine in Cambridgeshire for each year from 1986 to 2005. These data are area averages provided by the Met Office.

Rainfall (mm) Mean temperature (( 0) C) Sunshine (hours)

1986

596.8

9.03

1548.3

1987

636.6

9.26

1283.8

1988

580.7

9.94

1437.7

1989

515.2

10.79

1763.9

1990

408.0

10.99

1728.3

1991

433.0

9.76

1421.8

1992

671.0

10.19

1435.7

1993

682.3

9.82

1428.7

1994

561.8

10.61

1584.4

1995

507.6

10.65

1749.9

1996

411.6

9.28

1566.4

1997

514.4

10.75

1590.5

1998

674.8

10.58

1372.9

1999

618.0

10.95

1633.3

2000

726.8

10.64

1463.9

2001

705.4

10.25

1551.3

2002

637.8

10.95

1438.6

2003

484.5

10.87

1794.4

2004

628.8

10.89

1466.9

2005

482.5

10.77

1495.0


The following table shows the rainfall in Ely, and mean temperature and hours of sunshine in Denver, for each year from 1986 to 2005. These data are from individual Met Office monitoring stations. Denver is about 21 km from Ely. It is the closest station to Ely for which 20 years of temperature and sunshine data are available.


18 Dec 2006 : Column 1437W
Station:
Ely, Hervey Close Denver
Rainfall (mm) Mean temperature (( 0) C) Sunshine (hours)

1986

628.6

8.88

1596.4

1987

624.7

9.17

1345.3

1988

614.2

9.59

1477.3

1989

508.5

10.57

1763.4

1990

396.0

10.74

1737.0

1991

399.2

9.63

1430.8

1992

654.8

10.18

1453.1

1993

700.7

9.73

1411.4

1994

546.9

10.57

1549.6

1995

519.1

10.59

1716.8

1996

426.5

9.31

1628.8

1997

552.3

10.77

1610.6

1998

689.9

10.50

1356.6

1999

655.5

10.90

1672.7

2000

689.2

10.67

1521.4

2001

726.3

9.89

1554.6

2002

671.9

10.98

1423.8

2003

504.1

10.90

1788.7

2004

644.9

10.87

1459.0

2005

497.3

10.76

1446.9


Next Section Index Home Page