Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
19 Dec 2006 : Column 1985Wcontinued
Notes:
1. Figures rounded to the nearest 10.
2. Parliamentary constituencies are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant ONS postcode directory.
Source:
Information Directorate 100 per cent. sample.
John Battle: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people in (a) Leeds West constituency and (b) Leeds have received the winter allowance for pensioners in each year since it was introduced. [110349]
James Purnell: Information relating to winter fuel payments for the winters of 1997-98 and 1998-99 is not available. The information from winter 1999-2000 is in the following tables.
Leeds, West constituency | |
Payments made | |
Leeds local authority | |
Payments made | |
Notes: 1. Figures rounded to the nearest 10. 2. Local authorities and parliamentary constituencies are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant ONS postcode directory. Source: Information Directorate 100 per cent. sample. |
Mr. Burns: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many households in the Chelmsford local authority area were in receipt of (a) housing benefit and (b) council tax benefit in each year since 1996; and how many recipients in each case were (i) pensioner and (ii) non-pensioner households. [110054]
Mr. Plaskitt: The available information is in the following tables.
Housing benefit (HB) and council tax benefit (CTB) recipients by age in the Chelmsford local authority area | ||||||
Housing benefit | Council tax benefit | |||||
Total recipients | Recipients aged 60 and over | Recipients aged under 60 | Total recipients | Recipients aged 60 and over | Recipients aged 60 | |
Notes: 1. = nil 2. It is only possible to provide the information regarding HB and CTB with an age spilt from May 2004, as this information was not collected before this date. Source: Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System Quarterly 100 per cent caseload stock-count taken in May 2006. |
Mark Simmonds: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people in (a) Great Britain and (b) Boston and Skegness constituency were in receipt of each benefit administered by his Department (i) at the last date for which figures are available and (ii) on the same date in each of the previous 10 years; and how much was spent on each benefit in (A) Great Britain and (B) Boston and Skegness constituency in each year. [102514]
Mr. Plaskitt: The available information has been placed in the Library.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many claimants in (a) Great Britain, (b) each region and (c) each London borough did not receive the full child support payments they were entitled to in each of the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement. [102174]
Mr. Plaskitt: The Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Chief Executive.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claimants in (a) Great Britain (b) each region and (c) each London borough did not receive the full child support payments they were entitled to in each of the last 12 months; and if he will make a statement.
Table 1 attached gives the number of cases with an assessed/calculated maintenance liability that was not paid in full by the non-resident parent via the Agencys collection service in respect of the qualifying child or children in each month from October 2005 to September 2006. Tables 2 and 3 provide the same data by each Government region and each London borough.
It is worth noting that the tables contain cases where the non-resident parents have paid some of the maintenance liability they have for the financial support of their child or children, but not all of it. In the quarter ending September 2006:
in 60 per cent of cases where the non-resident parent was liable to pay maintenance, either the non-resident parent made a payment via the collection service or a Maintenance Direct arrangement was in place.
in those cases where the non-resident parent was paying via the collection service, the amount paid was, on average, 88 per cent of the maintenance due.
I hope you find this helpful.
Table 1: The number of cases with an assessed/calculated maintenance liability which was not paid in full by the non-resident parent via the Agencys collection service, Great Britain, October 2005 to September 2006. These figures are for cases held on both computer systems (CSCS and CS2) | |
Number | |
Table 2: The number of cases with an assessed/calculated maintenance liability which was not paid in full by the non-resident parent via the Agencys collection service, by Government office region, October 2005 to September 2006. These figures are for cases held on both computer systems (CSCS and CS2) | ||||||
October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |