| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Submarines
Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimates have been made of the cost of modernising the submarine infrastructure at (a) Coulport and (b) Faslane. [109886]
Des Browne: As stated at paragraph 5-11 of the White Paper “The Future of the United Kingdom’s Nuclear Deterrent” (Cm 6994), published on 4 December 2006, copies of which are available in the Library of the House, our initial estimate of the procurement costs for infrastructure will be in the range of £2-3 billion over the life of the new ballistic missile submarines. These estimated costs include modernisation of infrastructure at Coulport and Faslane to support the UK’s strategic deterrent.
Sudan
Lynda Waltho: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions the Government have had with NATO partners on implementation of (a) a no-fly zone over Darfur, (b) targeted sanction on perpetrators of the violence in Darfur and (c) increasing areas where humanitarian programmes may operate in Darfur. [110235]
Mr. Ingram: There have been no formal discussions in NATO fora concerning either a no-fly zone for Darfur or targeted sanctions. NATO has undertaken some relatively small-scale capacity building initiatives, such as staff capacity building, and provision of air lift to aid the African Union's roulement. HMG remains deeply concerned about the humanitarian situation in Darfur and, alongside NATO partners, continues to urge the Government of Sudan to accept United Nations assistance for the African Union Mission in Sudan, to honour the ceasefire, and to renew its political dialogue with rebel groups.
Thermal Imaging
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer dated 12 December 2006, Official Report, column 934W on thermal imaging, what the make of the new light weight thermal imaging sight was; how many are issued at platoon level; what plans he has to increase this number; and if he will make a statement. [110056]
Mr. Ingram: The Light Weight Thermal Imaging Sight is manufactured by QioptiQ. Currently one sight is issued at platoon level. Plans are in place to increase this number, by the procurement of over 300 additional sights.
Trident
Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what environmental impact assessments (EIAs) his Department has undertaken of the (a) deployment, (b) infrastructure facilities required for maintenance and (c) facilities used for decommissioning redundant or replaced parts of the Trident nuclear weapons system; and whether these EIAs have been published. [105267]
Des Browne: The Ministry of Defence has undertaken a number of Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in connection with the Trident nuclear weapons system. During the deployment of Vanguard Class submarines, EIAs are conducted whenever there is a requirement to do so, for example prior to the discharge of bilge water. Such EIAs are not published as to do so could enable deductions to be made on the operational location of the submarines and would, or would be likely to, prejudice the security of the United Kingdom.
For the infrastructure facilities required to support the maintenance of the system, an EIA was undertaken for Faslane and Coulport entitled “Proposed Development at the Clyde Submarine Base (Faslane and Coulport) Environmental Impact Assessment”. This was published in May 1984. The MOD also lodged an EIA in support of the D154 Project in Devonport with Plymouth City Council in 1994. No EIAs have yet been completed in respect of decommissioned redundant submarines.
Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what his estimate is of the time it would take to procure further Trident D5 missiles. [108974]
Des Browne: As set out in paragraph 2-5 of the recent White Paper, "The Future of the United Kingdom's Nuclear Deterrent, (Cm 6994), we believe that no further procurement of Trident D5 missiles will be necessary. Copies of the White Paper are available in the Library of the House.
Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the availability of (a) project management and (b) nuclear decommissioning expertise between (i) 2007 and 2012, (ii) 2013 and 2017 and (iii) 2018 and 2024 on projects related to Trident. [109486]
Des Browne: The Department aims to ensure that it has sufficient expert personnel to meet current and future nuclear programme demands through external recruitment, internal staff development and close involvement with industry. This includes those personnel required for the project management and nuclear decommissioning disciplines. The assessment of the likely demand for nuclear experts is undertaken in conjunction with the Nuclear Sector Skills Council who maintain an oversight of the issues surrounding the national requirement for staff with key nuclear skills, both civil and military. In addition, the MOD is represented at the Nuclear Employers Steering Group, which monitors trends at a national level to scope the likely future demand for staff.
TriStars: Spare Parts
Mr. David Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether any difficulties have been experienced in obtaining spare parts for the Royal Air Force’s fleet of TriStars. [109048]
Mr. Ingram: We have not experienced any significant problems in meeting spare demands from the Front Line to support the RAF’s TriStar aircraft. Current spare part availability for the TriStar fleet is sufficient to meet operational and training commitments.
The Defence Logistics Organisation is currently engaged with industry to develop the TriStar Integrated Operational Support (TRIOS) programme. TRIOS, which is consistent with the principles set out in the Defence Industrial Strategy, will move the focus from spares availability to guaranteed aircraft availability and bring together all aspects of TriStar logistic support. On current plans it is envisaged that a TRIOS contract will be awarded at the end of next year.
UK Reservists
Mr. Kidney: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what (a) funding and (b) other support his Department gives to employers in supporting the UK's reservists. [109822]
Derek Twigg: The Reserve Forces Act 1996 allows payments to Reservists and/or their employers when the former are called out into permanent service. The detailed regulations are set out in a Statutory Instrument (SI 859), which came into force in April 2005. Employers can claim up to £40,000 per year to cover certain additional costs arising from their employee's absence plus, without limit, agency fees, advertising costs and certain re-training expenses.
In addition, the SaBRE (Supporting Britain's Reservists and Employers) campaign aims to win and maintain the support of employers for the Volunteer Reserves. This is achieved through a combination of highly targeted direct marketing and the establishment of a network of Employer Support Executives to focus employer support at the regional level.
Veterans Lapel Badge
John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) if he will consider extending the qualifying entitlement for the HM Armed Forces Veterans Lapel Badge to include widows of First and Second World War veterans; [112703]
(2) if he will consider introducing a posthumous entitlement for the HM Armed Forces Veterans Lapel Badge to allow the children of deceased veterans to receive a badge on behalf of a parent. [112724]
Derek Twigg: The HM Armed Forces Veterans Badge was introduced to provide a public mark of those who have served in the UK armed forces and are still alive; it was designed to allow veterans living in the community to be identified and to raise awareness of their number and diversity. One exception to this rule was made for War Widow(er)s who are in receipt of a War Widow(er)’s pension to recognise the unique
circumstances of their spouses who were prevented from receiving their badge because of death attributable to illness or injury sustained during military service to their country. The badge is not a commemorative medal and we have no plans to introduce a posthumous entitlement more widely for widows of veterans who gave service in the First or Second World War and who died of natural causes, or for the children of deceased veterans.
War Graves
Mr. Iain Wright: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what discussions he has (a) had and (b) plans to have with the French government to prevent the disturbance of British war graves in the expansion of the Amiens to Lille motorway; and if he will make a statement. [109878]
Derek Twigg: There have been no discussions between the Ministry of Defence and the French Government on this project. The UK Government take a very close interest in the management of the nation's war graves but, along with other member governments, is represented in these matters by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC).
Although the final route for the Amiens-Lille motorway has yet to be chosen, the French authorities continue fully to consult the CWGC over the proposals and have recently repeated their assurance that no Commonwealth war cemetery will be affected by the development.
The French authorities are also fully aware that the discovery of any remains of British and Commonwealth Service personnel are to be immediately reported to the CWGC and the local police and of the need to protect them and any associated artefacts and personal effects for possible identification and re-burial.
War Pensions
Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what estimate he has made of the cost of relinking war pensions with earnings. [105713]
Derek Twigg: No assessment has yet been made of the cost of re-linking war pensions with earnings.
Warships
Dr. Julian Lewis: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what contingency plans have been prepared for further reductions in the number of Royal Navy vessels available for service; and whether it is intended that any should be mothballed. [109278]
Mr. Ingram [holding answer 18 December 2006]: As part of the Department’s present planning round, we are examining a range of proposals for the defence programme, both to enhance investment in certain areas and to reduce investment in areas of lower priority. Ministerial decisions on the forward defence programme will be taken in the first quarter of 2007 and appropriate announcements will be made in that timeframe.
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 6 December 2006, Official Report, column 447W, on Royal Navy ships, which types of warship are at extended readiness; and if he will make a statement. [110086]
Des Browne: I am withholding the details of the types of warship and their state of readiness as this could enable deductions to be made that could be prejudicial to national security.
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to his answer of 6 December 2006, Official Report, column 447W, what assessment he has made of the implications for the ability of the Royal Navy to meet its commitments of the number of warships on (a) reduced readiness and (b) extended readiness; and if he will make a statement. [110175]
Mr. Ingram: The Royal Navy remains fully capable of meeting all ongoing overseas and domestic commitments, as well as retaining forces at sufficient readiness to mount a contingent medium scale overseas deployment.
Culture, Media and Sport
Consultants
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport which 10 consultancy fees charged to her Department since May 1997 were the most expensive. [107166]
Mr. Lammy: The following list contains the Department’s 10 most expensive consultancy fees at award of contract since May 1997. Information on final contract values is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
| £ | |
Departmental Training and Equipment
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what the cost was of departmental training and equipment in Health and Safety DSE, referred to on page 108 of her Department's annual report; what equipment was used; and if she will make a statement. [109371]
Mr. Lammy: The Department spent £4,378 in 2005-06 on computer based software package to train staff in the use of DSE equipment.
Records of the purchase of miscellaneous items of equipment e.g. wrists records and document holders, are procured through general office stationery budget held centrally and could be provided only at disproportional cost.
Humanitarian Assistance Unit
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what the role of the Humanitarian Assistance Unit is; on what basis the unit is located in her Department; what projects the unit has funded to date; and if she will make a statement. [109583]
Tessa Jowell: My role as Minister for Humanitarian Assistance is to ensure that the needs of British victims of major emergencies and of their families are understood and properly considered within Government in building preparedness for and responding to major emergencies, and to represent the Government and explain their policies when dealing with victims and their families.
The Humanitarian Assistance Unit supports me in that role by leading three areas of work. First, it co-ordinates aftercare for victims of recent emergencies—offering a direct point of contact within Government, organising memorial and commemorative events, learning lessons from victims' experiences, and funding the 7 July Assistance Centre. Secondly, it assists emergency planning ahead of future incidents—working with other parts of central Government and alongside local responders to find ways to improve existing services. Finally it supports local responders in the response to an emergency—providing a link for local responders to advice and support from central Government.
In the first year of the unit's existence, funding has been provided: to support the 7 July Assistance Centre; for an independent evaluation of that centre; to produce non-statutory guidance for emergency responders on establishing Humanitarian Assistance Centres; to commission a review of academic literature and best practice on how to meet peoples’ needs In an emergency; and for events to commemorate the first anniversary of the 7 July bombings and to remember those who died in terrorist attacks overseas in 2005.
Licensing Act
Lynda Waltho: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what assessment she has made of the effects of the implementation of the Licensing Act 2003 on (a) consumers, (b) licensees and (c) community groups. [112745]
Mr. Woodward: Evidence from our own monitoring and from the trade suggests that, as a result of the Licensing Act 2003, licensees are now able to offer a greater range of opening hours to meet consumer demand. In addition, the survey of smaller music venues published on 7 December 2006 suggests that many premises previously restricted to operating under
the ‘two in a bar’ rule can now offer a greater choice of live music for consumers by putting on more than two musicians.
Community groups should benefit from the increasing number of local authorities which are licensing public land for those putting on licensable activities. We are aware that some community groups are finding it difficult to adjust to the new regime and we are looking at how measures announced in the Department’s simplification plan can help to address their concerns.
It remains early days and the Government’s programme of evaluation of the impact of reform will continue. I recently received a copy of the Independent Fees Panel’s Report and look forward to seeing what it has to say about the impact on fee payers, including licensees and community groups.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |