Previous Section Index Home Page

8 Jan 2007 : Column 90W—continued

Joint Personnel Administration

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what measures are in place to ensure Joint Personnel Administration connection to the Royal Navy ships. [110397]

Derek Twigg: For all surface vessels at sea, connection is provided to the main Joint Personnel Administration (JPA) system in the UK via a satellite link. When vessels are in port the ship-to-shore local area communications network is used.

When a satellite connection is unavailable, as is the case with submarines at sea, the vessel's own IT infrastructure stores work locally until it can be synchronised with the main JPA system.

Ships have been using these systems successfully since 13 November 2006.

KBR

Mr. Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) what assessment his Department has made of the significance of (a) the flotation of KBR on the stock market and (b) delays which recently prevented DML from securing a shipbuilding contract for Appledore shipyard for KBR’s commitment to its UK defence interests; [106672]

(2) if he will review urgently the fitness of KBR to own and operate vital strategic defence and other installations in the United Kingdom; [106673]

(3) what assurances his Department has received from KBR that (a) the UK’s strategic interests and (b) the future of DML will be safeguarded now that Halliburton-KBR are separate commercial entities; and if he will make a statement; [106674]

(4) what assessment his Department has made of the possible effects of an independently owned KBR on (a) the UK’s strategic interests and (b) DML and its Appledore and Devonport facilities; [106675]

(5) what assessment his Department has made of the impact of KBR splitting from Halliburton on (a) the future carrier programme, (b) the Vanguard class submarine overhaul and the refit of HMS Victorious and (c) the ongoing naval base review; and if he will make a statement. [106676]


8 Jan 2007 : Column 91W

Mr. Ingram [holding answer 5 December 2006]: Devonport Royal Dockyard is a strategic asset that plays a direct role in maintaining the UK’s nuclear deterrent. The Government require assurance that any prospective change of ownership of Devonport Royal Dockyard Ltd (DRDL) or any new influence or control should not adversely affect the essential security interests of the UK. On this basis the Government need to assess whether the planned separation of KBR from Halliburton would be acceptable. MOD is now in active discussion with KBR to ensure that the UK’s essential security interests are protected. The ability for Devonport Management Ltd. to bid freely for defence contracts is a key element of these interests.

Other work which KBR currently conducts for MOD has not been directly impacted by the separation of KBR from Halliburton.

I understand that the recent contract which DML’s Appledore facility had been hoping to secure was for a commercial order.

Legal Advice

David T.C. Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how much has been spent by the Department on external legal advice in each of the past five years. [109104]

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost to his Department was of (a) hiring external lawyers and (b) external legal advice in each year since 1997. [110104]

Derek Twigg [holding answer 18 December 2006]: The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Mental Health

Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many personnel have been treated for (a) post-traumatic stress disorder and (b) other mental health problems after serving in (i) Iraq and (ii) Afghanistan since February 2004; what percentage of troops serving in each of these theatres the figures represent; and if he will make a statement. [110457]

Derek Twigg: Between 1 January 2003 and 30 June 2006, 1,897 UK service personnel (regular and reservists) who deployed to Iraq on Operation Telic were diagnosed at a DCMH with a mental health condition thought to be related to their deployment. This represents around 1.5 per cent. of personnel deployed to Operation Telic over the same period. Of this number, 278 fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. This represents around 0.3 per cent. of personnel deployed to Operation Telic over the same period.

Figures for the quarter 1 July-30 September 2006 are not yet available.

The figures do not include any personnel who have received treatment for a mental health condition since leaving the armed forces. This is because on leaving the armed forces, or on demobilisation for reservists, it is the long established practice that responsibility for
8 Jan 2007 : Column 92W
medical care passes to the NHS. To collate figures on medical treatment received by every veteran would require an examination of the records of every NHS trust (and every independent healthcare provider) in the country and could therefore be done only at disproportionate cost.

At a time when personnel have been deployed to other operational theatres before or after deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan, it is becoming increasingly difficult to attribute a subsequent mental health condition (which in some cases might not present itself until some time after the person’s deployment ends) to service on a specific deployment. We therefore have not conducted a similar collation for Afghanistan. The Department is currently reviewing its methods of collating figures on service personnel diagnosed with a mental health condition.

Meteorological Office

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the extent to which the Meteorological Office has achieved value for money exploiting synergies between its weather service and its research on climate change. [110413]

Derek Twigg: There is significant interdependency between weather forecasting and climate research and significant financial efficiencies are derived from collocation of these programmes within the Met Office. As a result the Met Office has a world leading capability in weather forecasting and climate research.

The Met Office's Unified Model is used for both numerical weather prediction and climate modelling as well as a variety of related research activities, and shared development of the model brings huge benefits to both disciplines.

Significant value for money is also derived by maximising the utilisation of the Met Office's supercomputing capacity. Weather forecasting requires short bursts of supercomputing capacity, allowing climate research activities to be scheduled when the supercomputer would otherwise be idle.

Climate change research also benefits from ready and efficient access to global observational data collected by the Met Office for its global weather forecasting capability and by utilising research of atmospheric processes carried out by the Met Office's research aircraft.

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what work the Meteorological Office's Hadley Centre for Climate Change Research undertakes (a) to enable the Government to plan for the impacts of climate change in the UK and (b) to assess the impact of climate change in developing countries; and if he will make a statement. [110414]

Derek Twigg: The Met Office's Hadley Centre provides advice on the impacts of climate change to a number of Government Departments, including MOD and Defra. The Hadley Centre provided extensive input to the Stern Review about climate impacts and helps develop scenarios of future climate change for the UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP). In addition, the Hadley Centre's model for tides and
8 Jan 2007 : Column 93W
storm surges in European coastal waters helps the UK improve its plans for protecting against changes in extreme sea levels.

The Hadley Centre also takes a lead in international science, and is central to the production of the forthcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report on "Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability".

The Hadley Centre has developed a regional climate modelling system, Providing Regional Climates for Impacts Studies (PRECIS) that is available free of charge to developing countries, enabling them to produce high resolution climate change scenarios and assess regional vulnerability to climate change. There are currently over 190 users of PRECIS from more than 60 countries worldwide.

The Hadley Centre is expanding its programme of research into the impacts of climate change. The research has both a global and UK focus. The main areas are currently water resources, flood risk, agricultural yields, natural ecosystems, sea level rise and human health.

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what targets have been set for savings by the Meteorological Office; and what assessment he has made of the implications of savings measures for the office’s climate change research programme. [109487]

Derek Twigg: Met Office climate research activities depend on funding from a number of sources, including MOD, through the Government Met Research and Public Weather Service programmes, and Defra.

It is important that MOD regularly reviews its spending plans, balances relative priorities and drives efficiency in public spending. Ministerial decisions on the forward Defence programme will be taken in the first quarter of 2007, and appropriate announcements on the outcome of the planning round will be made in that timeframe.

Military Deployments

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what total number of personnel has been deployed to (a) Afghanistan and (b) Iraq since October 2001, broken down by (i) roulement and (ii) service. [105671]

Mr. Ingram: The specific information requested is not held centrally by the Ministry of Defence. Accurate information on the total number of personnel that have been deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq since October 2001, broken down by roulement and service could be aggregated from individual records and only at disproportionate cost.

Military Parachutists

Paul Flynn: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans he has to introduce (a) automatic activation devices and (b) audio altimeters for military trainee parachutists. [105609]


8 Jan 2007 : Column 94W

Mr. Ingram: There are no plans to introduce (a) automatic activation devices and (b) audio altimeters for military trainee parachutists. The use of automatic activation devices and audible altimeters was considered but it was determined that for military trainee parachutists the risks to safety would outweigh any benefit that these devices might provide.

Ministerial Visits

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what official visits (a) he and (b) his Ministers have made in England in the past 12 months. [103359]

Derek Twigg: Defence Ministers have made the following visits in England between 1 November 2005 and 1 December 2006:

Visits by Secretary of State, 1 November 2005 to 1 December 2006
Date of visit Place visited

28 November 2005

Defence Academy, Wiltshire, Wantage

20 January 2006

RAF Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey, Surrey Heath

20 January 2006

Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Selly Oak, Birmingham, Birmingham Selly Oak

27 January 2006

Salisbury Plain, Wiltshire, Salisbury

14 February 2006

Defence Academy, Wiltshire, Wantage

19 April 2006

RAF Museum, London, Hendon

18 July 2006

Farnborough Air Show, Hampshire, Aldershot

19 July 2006

Defence Academy, Wiltshire, Wantage

15 August 2006

RAF Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey, Surrey Heath

15 August 2006

Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Selly Oak, Birmingham, Birmingham Selly Oak

21 September 2006

Flag Officer Sea Training, Devonport, Devon

27 September 2006

Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Selly Oak, Birmingham, Birmingham Selly Oak

11 October 2006

Colchester Garrison, Colchester

17 October 2006

RAF High Wycombe, Strike Command, Buckinghamshire., Aylesbury



8 Jan 2007 : Column 95W
Visits by min(AF) 1 November 2005 to 1 December 2006
Date of visit Place visited

24 November 2005

HMS Bulwark, Devonport, Devon

30 November 2005

DLO Caversfield, Bicester, Banbury

5 December 2005

RAF Odiham, Surrey, North East Hampshire

20 December 2005

BFPO Mill Hill, Middlesex, Hendon

26 January 2006

Defence Geographic Centre, Feltham, Middlesex, Feltham and Heston

7 February 2006

RAF Odiham, Surrey, North East Hampshire

1 March 2006

Chicksands, Bedfordshire, Mid Bedfordshire

3 July 2006

DPA Abbey Wood, Avon, Bristol North East

3 July 2006

DLO Ensleigh, Somerset, Bath

10 July 2006

RAF Headley Court, Epsom, Surrey, Surrey Heath

25 July 2006

Westdown Camp, Wiltshire, Salisbury

17 August 2006

RAF Flyingdales, North Yorkshire, Ryedale

17 August 2006

RAF Menwith Hill, Harrogate, Skipton and Ripon

18 August 2006

Army Foundation College, Harrogate, Skipton and Ripon

31 August 2006

RAF Marham, Norfolk, South West Norfolk

21 September 2006

Defence Academy, Wiltshire, Wantage

21 September 2006

Portsmouth, Hampshire, Portsmouth South

10 October 2006

RAF Cottesmore, Rutland and Melton

11 October 2006

Colchester Garrison, Colchester

12 October 2006

RAF Fairford, Gloucester, Cotswold

12 October 2006

HQ AG, Upavon, Devizes

16 October 2006

RAF Molesworth, Cambridge, Huntingdon

17 October 2006

DSDA Bicester, Oxon, Banbury

15 November 2006

HQ AG, Upavon, Devizes

16 November 2006

Royal Marines Poole, Dorset, Poole

20 November 2006

PJHQ Northwood, Middlesex, South West Hertfordshire


Next Section Index Home Page