Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Jan 2007 : Column 592W—continued


Golden Rule Compliance

Mr. Gauke: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the last year of the current economic cycle will be included in the next economic cycle for the purposes of calculating compliance with the Golden Rule. [112835]

Mr. Timms [holding answer 8 January 2007]: The Government set out their latest assessment of progress against the Golden Rule in each Budget and pre-Budget report. The most recent assessment is set out in paragraphs 2.54 to 2.57 of the 2006 pre-Budget report, Cm 6984.

Public Accounts Commission

Parliamentary Questions

Mrs. May: To ask the Chairman of the Public Accounts Commission (1) how many written parliamentary questions to the Public Accounts Commission in the 2005-06 Session were not answered wholly or in part on grounds of disproportionate cost; [113269]

(2) how many written parliamentary questions to the Public Accounts Commission in the 2005-06 Session were answered with a reply that it had not been possible to reply before prorogation, or similar wording. [113270]

Mr. Alan Williams: None.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Bat Licences

Mr. Fraser: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many bat licences have been granted by his Department in the last five years. [109980]

Barry Gardiner: The number of bat licences issued under Regulation 44(2)(e) of the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994 in the last five years is shown in the following table.

Number of licences issued

2002

258

2003

383

2004

402

2005

540

2006

681


British Waterways

Charlotte Atkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what meetings (a) he and (b) his Ministers have held with boating organisations since the announcement of budget reductions to British Waterways in 2006-07. [107489]

Barry Gardiner [holding answer 5 December 2006]: I refer my hon. Friend to the reply given to her on 11 December 2006, Official Report, column 731W. This details meetings the Secretary of State has had with British Waterways. The Secretary of State has not met with any boating organisations. Lord Rooker met the chair of the Inland Waterways Association informally on 26 November.

I met with British Waterways on 19 July and 27 November 2006 and with the Broads Authority on 16 March and 18 September 2006 and I also met with the Waterways Trust on 26 April 2006 and The Waterways all Party Parliamentary Group on 12 December 2006.

Canals

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the volume of canal traffic was in each year since 2000. [112782]

Barry Gardiner: The majority of canals in England and Wales are managed by British Waterways. The volume of traffic is recorded in terms of licences sold. These are set out as follows:

Licences sold

1999-2000

25,195

2000-01

25,401

2001-02

26,334

2002-03

26,426

2003-04

26,240

2004-05

27,078

2005-06

29,000


Information on the canals owned or managed by non-public navigation authorities is not available.

EU Agricultural Policy

Daniel Kawczynski: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent discussions he has had with his EU counterparts on agricultural policy. [109967]

Mr. Bradshaw: Ministers and officials in the Department have regular discussions with EU counterparts on agricultural issues, in particular in the context of the monthly Agriculture and Fisheries Council meetings.


10 Jan 2007 : Column 593W

Fish Stocks

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what percentage of the UK fish stock was classified as (a) in danger and (b) at risk in (i) 2001, (ii) 1996 and (iii) the most recent period for which figures are available. [110438]

Mr. Bradshaw: The International Council for the Exploration of the Seas (ICES) classifies a stock’s status by comparing the amount of mature fish (the spawning stock biomass) and the rate at which the stock is exploited in comparison with agreed reference levels.

In terms of spawning stock biomass, a stock is considered to have either full reproductive capacity, being at risk of suffering reduced reproductive capacity or suffering reduced reproductive capacity.

In terms of the rate of fishing mortality, a stock is considered to be harvested sustainably, at risk of being harvested unsustainably or harvested unsustainably.

The current system for classification was introduced in 1998, making comparison with earlier years difficult. The following table presents the percentage composition within each category for the 47 stocks of most interest to the UK. Figures are given for 1998, 2001 and 2006.

Category ICES Classification 1998 2001 2006

In danger

Very low level of spawning stock biomass

51

38

15

At risk

Reduced level of spawning stock biomass

4

0

13

At risk

Full reproductive capacity but harvest rate too high

4

17

11

Healthy

Full reproductive capacity and low exploitation rate

19

17

17

Unknown

Stock status uncertain

21

28

45


Fisheries

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Securing the Benefits initiative in tackling fisheries management since June 2005. [113109]

Mr. Bradshaw: Good progress has been made since DEFRA and the devolved administrations published “Securing the Benefits” in response to the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit landmark report, “Net Benefits”. In particular, in terms of modernisation of fisheries management, we have achieved the following results:


10 Jan 2007 : Column 594W

Further information on the progress that has been made over the last year is contained in DEFRA’s progress report which was published as a supplement to “Fishing Focus” in October 2006 on the DEFRA website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/fish/pdf/fishfocus 1006supp.pdf.

Gamebird Farms

Mr. Morley: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether the integrated pollution prevention and control regulations apply to intensive gamebird farms. [110004]

Mr. Bradshaw: Gamebirds—that is to say, those hunted for sport—are not poultry and thus not subject to the Integrated Pollution Prevention Control Directive or the regulations which transpose it.

Wild Birds

Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many seizures there were of wild birds illegally imported into the UK in the 12 months (a) before and (b) since October 2005. [112693]

Mr. Bradshaw: From October 2004 to September 2005, Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) made seven seizures of wild birds illegally imported into the UK under their border enforcement powers relating to the Convention on Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna (CITES). These comprised 311 wild birds in total.

From October 2005 to October 2006 HMRC made three seizures of wild birds illegally imported into the UK under their powers relating to CITES. These comprised three wild birds in total.

Transport

Airport Security

Paul Rowen: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what the security costs were for each UK international airport in each of the last three years; and with whom responsibility lies for meeting those costs. [113713]

Gillian Merron: The costs associated with delivering the Government’s aviation security requirements are the responsibility of the industry. In some cases security will be a dedicated function and in others security will be combined with other duties. It is
10 Jan 2007 : Column 595W
therefore not possible to put a figure on the financial cost to industry of implementing security measures.

Paul Rowen: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he expects to make available a synopsis of the Boys Smith report on airport security. [113715]

Gillian Merron: The Secretary of State made a written statement 20 July 2006 confirming that the content of the report is not appropriate for public consumption and will not therefore be placed in the Library.

A further statement will be made in due course.

Paul Rowen: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport pursuant to his written statement of 20 July 2006, Official Report, column 56WS, on airport policing, if he will place in the Library a summary and the recommendations of the report. [110354]

Gillian Merron [holding answer 8 January 2007]: The Secretary of State made a written statement, 20 July 2006, confirming that the content of the report is not appropriate for public consumption and will not therefore be placed in the Library.

A further statement will be made in due course.

Car Exhaust Noise

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what measures he has put in place to ensure that car owners do not alter exhaust or silencer systems after an MOT test to ensure that those systems do not break noise regulations. [114124]

Dr. Ladyman: Enforcement of the Road Traffic Regulations is primarily a matter for the police, although the Vehicle Operator and Standards Agency support this process through a programme of roadside inspections.

An objective assessment of the noise levels of individual vehicles during a roadside inspection is problematic due to interference from other noise sources, and static testing does not necessarily give a good representation of the level of noise with the vehicle in motion. However the Department is considering letting further research into the feasibility of a simple and robust test that might be used in these circumstances.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will further tighten regulations 54 and 97 of the Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) Regulations 1986 to ensure that exhaust and silencer systems remain in good working order and do not make excessive noise. [114125]

Dr. Ladyman: The Department currently has no plans to tighten the regulations referred to, although this position is kept under review. Regulation 54 already requires exhaust systems to be maintained in good and efficient working order and prohibits modification to increase the level of noise emissions. The regulations as they stand are therefore adequate for dealing with noisy vehicles.


10 Jan 2007 : Column 596W

Driver Vision Test

Mr. Carmichael: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the current distance vision test for checking novice drivers’ vision; and if he will make a statement; [113767]

(2) what steps he (a) has taken and (b) plans to take to ensure all motorists have vision of the required standard for driving safety; [113768]

(3) what estimate he has made of the level of uncorrected visual impairment among the driving population; and if he will make a statement; [113769]

(4) what estimate he has made of the number of road traffic accidents where poor vision has been a contributory factor; and if he will make a statement. [113770]

Dr. Ladyman: A review of the eyesight testing requirements for drivers is being undertaken alongside a review of medical licensing, and it is intended to issue proposals for consultation in the spring.

Accurate estimates of the prevalence of visual function below the current visual standards cannot be made at present. Police officers can check a driver’s visual acuity at the roadside only when impaired driving is observed and vision is suspected as its cause. The DVLA can check whether a driver’s self-declared unimpaired visual function is correct only when there are reasonable grounds for suspicion.

In 2005 there were 147,509 road accidents in which a police officer attended the scene and at least one contributory factor was identified. Uncorrected defective eyesight was identified as one of the contributory factors in only 226 personal injury accidents. Poor eyesight was named as the sole contributory factor in only 12 of these 226 accidents.


Next Section Index Home Page