|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
|Housing benefit expenditure on households in temporary accommodation|
|Nominal||Real terms (2006-07 prices)|
1. Expenditure data are taken from local authorities subsidy returns.
2. All figures are final audited data with the exception of 2005-06 which is provisional (pre-audited) data.
3. GDP deflator is the latest available as at 5 pm on 2 November 2006, last updated 27 September 2006, and is taken from:
4. Due to historical differences in the treatment of Scottish rent rebate expenditure, it is not possible from local authority subsidy returns to identify all expenditure on temporary accommodation in Scotland. These figures may therefore slightly understate temporary accommodation expenditure. From an assessment of the England and Wales data, we estimated that this understatement would be of the order of £1-2 million.
Mr. Steen: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what changes were made to the mobility needs assessment required for the (a) lower, (b) middle and (c) higher rate of care component of incapacity benefit to be paid in each of the last three years. 
Mrs. McGuire: Incapacity benefit does not have a care component. No changes have been made to the assessment criteria for entitlement to the care component of disability living allowance in the last three years.
Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for how many weeks linking rules apply to housing benefit for those claimants who might be eligible under the Governments 104 week linking rules applying to incapacity benefit when returning to work. 
Mr. Plaskitt: The 104 week linking rules which may apply to incapacity benefit claimants when returning to work can also be applied to recipients of the disability premium in claims for housing benefit.
Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the performance of job-retention services pilot schemes for employees with mental health problems. 
Mr. Jim Murphy: Final results from the job retention and rehabilitation pilot are published in DWP research report 339: Experiences of the Job Retention and Rehabilitation Pilot and DWP report 342: Impacts of the Job Retention and Rehabilitation Pilot, which are available in the Library.
Mr. Hepburn: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people claimed jobseekers allowance in (a) Jarrow constituency, (b) South Tyneside, (c) the North East and (d) the UK in each year since 1997. 
|Jobseekers allowance claimants in the Jarrow parliamentary constituency, South Tyneside Metropolitan borough council, Government Office for the North East region and the UK; at December each year, 1997-2006|
|Date||Jarrow||South Tyneside||North East||UK|
1. Figures have been rounded to the nearest five,
2. Figures include clerically held cases.
100 per cent. count of claimants of unemployment-related benefits, Jobcentre Plus computer systems.
Mr. O'Hara: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what proportion of people ending a claim for jobseekers allowance of duration of (a) three to six, (b) six to 12 and (c) 12 months or more in the most recent year for which figures are available moved back into work; and how many there were (i) in total, (ii) aged 25 to 49 and (iii) aged over 50 years. 
|Proportion of jobseekers allowance (JSA) claimants within each duration range who entered into a job within six weeks of their claim ending|
|Duration of JSA claim||Percentage|
1. The information is for JSA claims which end between April 2005 and March 2006.
2. Job entries that start within six weeks of the end of the JSA claim are included.
3. The job entries in the table are derived from two sources of information (i) the reason given by the claimant for ending their claim and (ii) job entries notified to Her Majestys Revenue and Customs. There may be additional job entries that we do not know about.
Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people (a) of working age and (b) aged under 25 years claimed jobseekers allowance in each month since 1996; and how many re-applied for the allowance within six months of having previously ceased drawing the benefit. 
Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much his Department paid out in (a) loans and (b) grants to people to pay for (i) furniture and (ii) white goods in 2005-06; and what systems his Department has in place to ensure that payment for these items is spent as intended. 
|Estimate gross expenditure in Great Britain in 2005-06|
|Category||Crisis loans||Community care grants|
DWP Social fund policy, budget and management information system.
There are no systems in place to check how applicants spend the award of a repayable loan or community care grant. In 2005-06 there with over 2.5 million such awards in total. The administrative cost of policing these awards is prohibitive, and in any case loans are fully repayable. It is the responsibility of the customer to use the loan or grant appropriately. Exceptionally, the decision maker may decide to make payment to a third party who can provide, or arrange for the provision of, the items covered by the award.
Each of the three discretionary social fund paymentscommunity care grants, budgeting loans, crisis loanshas its own application form. The form is designed to obtain from the applicant the type of information needed to make an initial decision for that particular payment type.
The focus of each form is therefore differentfor example the crisis loan process elicits information about the emergency or disaster, whilst the community care grant process focuses on where a grant will help to cope with special difficulties and promote community care.
Each application contains a declaration that the information given is correct and complete as far as the applicant knows and believes. And a declaration of understanding that if incorrect or incomplete information is given, there is a liability to prosecution or other action.
Mr. Steen: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to his letter of 1 February 2007 reference POS(5)10535/102 regarding Miss Hinkley of Totnes, if he will list the documents which were incorrectly filed; what effect the misfiling of the documents had on the refund due to Miss Hinkley; if he will take steps to ensure that such filing errors are avoided in future; and if he will repay the interest forgone by Miss Hinkley and compensate her for her loss and inconvenience. 
Mr. Plaskitt: None of the national insurance numbers (NINOs) held on the DWP Customer Information System database can be categorised as bogus or surplus. All NINOs have to conform to a standard format and are tested against validation criteria held within the NINO database.
Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his Departments procedure is for claiming back overpaid state pensions and benefits from the estate of claimants who have died; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. Plaskitt: Recovery of overpayments of benefit are sought from the Representative dealing with the deceaseds estate. If there is no estate, or insufficient in the estate to make full repayment, the balance will be written off.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|