Previous Section Index Home Page

19 Feb 2007 : Column 140W—continued

Prisons: Wales

Hywel Williams: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) whether the National Offender Management Service is pursuing a site for a new prison in (a) South Wales and (b) North Wales; [112522]

(2) whether the National Offender Management Service has tested any locations for new prisons suggested in the business case presented by the North Wales Criminal Justice Board. [112515]

Mr. Sutcliffe: A national site search is under way, with South Wales one of a number of priority areas due to strategic need. Other priority areas include London, the North West and the West Midlands.

North Wales is not currently included in these priorities. However, the National Offender Management Service continues to investigate all options for providing further increases in capacity.

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) whether the National Offender Management Service in Wales is actively pursuing the
19 Feb 2007 : Column 141W
establishment of a new prison facility in Wales; [119850]

(2) whether the National Offender Management Service in Wales has actively tested any of the locations suggested in the business case presented by the North Wales Criminal Justice Board for suitability for a new prison facility. [119867]

Mr. Sutcliffe [holding answer 8 February 2007]: The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) is currently undertaking searches to identify sites for new prisons in areas of highest demand for prison places. The priority search areas are London and the Thames corridor, South Wales, the North West and the West Midlands. NOMS is aware of the site proposed by the North Wales Local Criminal Justice Board in evidence to the Welsh Affairs Committee in December 2006. The site is considerably smaller than those under consideration for development as a new prison.

Private Prisons

Mr. Gerrard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many assaults there were on (a) staff and (b) prisoners at each private prison in 2005-06. [117569]

Mr. Sutcliffe: The information is provided in the following table.

1 January 2005-31 December 2005 1 January 2006-31 December 2006
Prison Number of assaults on staff Number of assaults on prisoners Number of assaults on staff Number of assaults on prisoners

Altcourse

44

200

36

199

Ashfield

153

501

129

625

Bronzefield

85

95

76

115

Doncaster

24

96

46

145

Dovegate

35

69

58

66

Forest Bank

82

431

50

344

Lowdham Grange

16

37

34

74

Parc

41

229

48

245

Peterborough

72

104

137

226

Rye Hill

65

53

48

61

Wolds

3

23

8

34


Mr. Gerrard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether any private prison has been refinanced by a holding or partner company. [117570]

Mr. Sutcliffe: There are no private prisons that have been refinanced by a holding or partner company.

Mr. Gerrard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many unfilled posts there were in the Prison Service in (a) public and (b) private prisons in each of the last 12 months. [117572]

Mr. Sutcliffe: The number of unfilled posts for the last five quarters is shown in the following tables. These figures include all posts, both operational and non-operational, across the whole Prison Service. For the
19 Feb 2007 : Column 142W
public sector they reflect the impact of additional hours worked through contracted supplementary hours and agency staffing. The number of unfilled posts represent around 3 per cent. of all posts.

Public sector
Date( 1) Shortfall on staffing requirement having included CSH and agency staff( 2)

31 December 2005

1,335

31 March 2006

1,534

30 June 2006

1,463

30 September 2006

1,228

31 December 2006

1,480

(1) Staffing requirements are centrally reported quarterly and therefore the number of unfilled posts is only available for the end of each quarter.
(2) Information has been derived from the Personnel Corporate Database, Oracle HRMS and Quarterly Forecast Change Forms completed by each establishment. Where an establishment has recorded a surplus of staff this has not been used to off-set shortfalls of others.

Private prisons
Shortfall on staffing requirement( 1)

January

181

February

177

March

206

April

190

May

186

June

146

July

155

August

182

September

181

October

187

November

181

December

198

(1) Private prisons information has been obtained from the Home Office, on behalf of Serco, GSL, G4S, and KALYX human resources databases.

Probation Service

John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the projected balance is in the national probation budget for 2006-07; and what consequences are expected for service delivery. [113399]

Mr. Sutcliffe: The overall budget for 2006-07 for the national probation service is £883 million. The current projected out-turn is within 0.5 per cent. of this figure.

There are 13 main probation performance indicators which can be compared with 2005-06. For the period April to September 2006, the performance against 10 of these indicators is equal to or exceeding the 2005-06 performance.

Prospect Hostel, Exeter

Mr. Gerrard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the average annual cost was of running approved premises performing similar functions to the Prospect Hostel in Exeter in 2005-06. [104761]

Mr. Sutcliffe: Approved premises in the main estate do not perform directly comparable functions to the Prospects premises. Whereas most approved premises
19 Feb 2007 : Column 143W
are a public protection resource for the management of high risk offenders, the Prospects premises were established to provide an accommodation, interventions and support package targeted at released prisoners convicted of acquisitive crimes to fund their drug habit.

In 2005-06 the average grant payment to an approved premises in the mainstream estate was £535,730.

Prostitution

Lorely Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what estimate his Department has made of the proportion of prostitutes who were (a) addicted to drugs, (b) born outside the UK and (c) victims of human trafficking in each of the last 10 years. [118334]

Mr. Sutcliffe: It is not possible to provide precise figures as so much prostitution is hidden from view. However published Home Office research has looked at the numbers involved who are drug addicted and has provided broad estimates of the numbers of people trafficked into the UK for the purposes of prostitution. Information on the proportion born outside the UK is not available.

A Home Office Research Study in 2004 profiled 228 women involved in street-based prostitution. It found 87 per cent. were using heroin and 64 per cent. crack
19 Feb 2007 : Column 144W
cocaine. Anecdotal evidence from respondents to the Home Office-led review of prostitution in 2004 suggested that a high proportion—in many areas, almost all—of those involved in street-based prostitution are Class A drug users. Home Office funded research in 2000 found that 71 women were known to have been trafficked into prostitution in the UK in 1998. Using this figure as a baseline the research estimated that there may have been between 142 and 1,420 women trafficked into the UK during the same period.

A research paper on sizing UK organised crime markets and their associated harms will be published in early 2007. Emerging findings suggest that at any one moment in time in 2003 there were around 4,000 victims of trafficking for prostitution in the UK.

Lorely Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many successful prosecutions relating to (a) soliciting by a prostitute, (b) kerb crawling and (c) the operation of a brothel there were in each of the last 10 years. [118340]

Mr. Sutcliffe: Data from the court proceedings database held by the Office for Criminal Justice Reform on the number of defendants convicted at all courts for various offences in England and Wales, 1996 to 2005, relating to prostitution can be found in the following table:


19 Feb 2007 : Column 145W

19 Feb 2007 : Column 146W
The number of defendants convicted at all courts for various offences relating to prostitution in England and Wales, 1996-2005( 1, 2, 3)
Statute Offence Description 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 33A as amended by Sexual Offences Act 2003, section 55

Keeping a brothel used for prostitution

4

8

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 32

Man soliciting or importuning in a public place for immoral purposes

68

47

42

16

9

5

3

9

3

2

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 33

Keeping a brothel

24

20

12

29

13

6

7

4

15

11

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 34

Letting premises for use as a brothel

2

2

1

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 35

Tenant permitting premises to be used as a brothel

1

2

2

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 36

Tenant permitting premises to be used for prostitution

3

1

1

Sexual Offences Act 1956, section 33 as amended by Sexual Offences Act 1967, section 6

Keeping a brothel for homosexual practices

1

Sexual Offences Act 1985, section 1

Kerb-crawling

1,096

813

700

599

700

775

891

834

760

635

Sexual Offences Act 1985, section 2

Persistent soliciting of women for the purpose of prostitution

56

68

65

51

26

66

102

50

48

34

Vagrancy Act 1824, section 3. Vagrancy Act 1824, section 4

Offences by prostitutes, common prostitute behaving in a riotous and indecent manner in a public place. Offences by prostitutes: Second conviction as an idle and disorderly person

7

7

4

4

1

3

7

17

6

1

Street Offences Act 1959, section 1

Common prostitute loitering or soliciting for the purpose of prostitution

5,429

5,695

5,223

3,378

3,385

2,841

2,668

2,627

1,735

1,116

Other offences relating to prostitution

Other offences relating to prostitution

3

Total

6,686

6,654

6,046

4,083

4,135

3,697

3,679

3,541

2,571

1,807

— = Nil. (1) These data are on the principal offence basis. (2 )Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used. (3) Staffordshire Police Force were only able to submit sample data for persons proceeded against and convicted in the magistrates' courts for the year 2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher orders of data, these data are not robust enough at a detailed level and have been excluded from the table. Source: RDS Office for Criminal Justice Reform.

Next Section Index Home Page