|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Anne Main: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer on how many occasions special advisers have been consulted in replying to Freedom of Information requests to his Department; and what his Departments policy is on the role of special advisers in the answering of Freedom of Information requests. 
Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many items of furniture were (a) lost and (b) stolen from his Department in each year since 1997; and what the value was of those items in each year. 
Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many vehicles belonging to his Department were (a) lost and (b) stolen in each year since 1997; and what the (i) make and model and (ii) value was of each vehicle. 
John Healey: Since the introduction of the Departments current accounting system in 2002-03, vehicles used by HM Treasury have been provided by the Government Car Service and none have been owned by the Department in that time. A search of our records prior to then could be undertaken only at disproportionate cost but we are not aware of any vehicles having been lost or stolen in the years prior to 2002-03.
Mr. Gauke: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether Sir Nicholas Stern is continuing to work for his Department on climate change; and whether he plans to commission Sir Nicholas to undertake further such work. 
Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 31 January 2007, Official Report, column 339W, on the employee exit survey, if he will place in the Library a copy of the report on open ended responses, with any personal information edited from it. 
John Healey: The responses to the open-ended comments in the employee exit survey contain only personal information. Therefore, it is not appropriate to release this information into the public domain.
Share Incentive Plan, as with all tax policies, is under constant review and, as part of the ongoing evaluation of employee share scheme, HMRC has recently commissioned a large scale survey of Share Incentive Plan, which seeks to examine the attitudes and perceptions of both employees and employers towards the reliefs. The research is expected to finish later this year and will be published on the HMRC website.
John Healey [holding answer 8 February 2007]: VEDs environmental signal to motorists has been progressively refined and sharpened. The Government continue to monitor vehicle registrations in the light of its expectation that the numbers of vehicles in the three lowest CO(2) emissions graduated VED bands will grow, in part due to reforms to VED bands.
Mr. Heald: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the cost to the public purse was, including staff time, of action by (a) his Department, (b) solicitors working for his Department and (c) the Office of Government Commerce in challenging Freedom of Information (FOI) requests relating to Gateway reviews of the National Identity Card programme, broken down by stage of FOI process. 
John Healey: OGC has incurred £13,870.66 of costs for litigation services with the Treasury Solicitors Department up to 31 December 2006. Information regarding other costs is unavailable and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the answer of 29 November 2006, Official Report, column 724W, on Home Condition Reports, whether his Department made representations to the Department for Communities and Local Government in the calendar year 2006 which related to home condition reports or home information packs. 
Neither Treasury nor Communities and Local Government have made an assessment of the effect of London house prices on those of the rest of the UK. The Barker Review of Housing Supply, published in March 2004, concluded that UK house price trends reflect a lack of housing supply and weak responsiveness of housing supply to prices. In autumn 2003, the Bank of England concluded that there was evidence that regional house price changes were consistent with the South East, including London, playing a role in leading, or even causing, movements in the rest of the UK but only in the late 1980s/early 1990s and not during other periods.
The Government's macroeconomic framework has delivered stability and rising prosperity. More people have had the confidence to become homeowners, with around 1.8 million more homeowners since 1997. The Government's response to Kate Barker's Review of Housing Supply, published alongside the 2005 pre-Budget report, set out how improving affordability for future generations of homebuyers required housing supply to become much
more responsive to demand. It set out a comprehensive package of proposals, including an ambition to increase housing supply to 200,000 net additional homes per year by 2016.
|Amounts of income tax liabilities (£ billion)|
|Scotland||UK||Scotlands share of UK income tax liabilities (%)|
Dawn Primarolo: Amounts written off which would be attributable to incorrectly addressed letters are included in the Trust Statement overall figures for write-off of income tax where the taxpayer is untraceable for all sorts of reasons. Over the last two years the sums written off because we could not trace a customer represented some 0.03 per tax of income tax receipts.
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what cost benefit analysis (a) has been conducted by his Department and (b) is planned of the recommendations in the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. 
The Government will continue to assess the costs and benefits as it considers how best to take forward the recommendations from the Review. This will include the preparation of impact assessments which will be published as part of the consultation process.
As set out in the Gowers Report, the Chair of the Strategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property will be operationally independent from Government and be appointed by the Chancellor. Membership of the Board will be drawn from a wide range of stakeholders, including academics, consumer groups and industry representatives. In addition to independent stakeholders, the head of the Intellectual Property and Innovation Directorate of the Patent Office and senior officials from DTI and HM Treasury will also sit on the Board.
Mr. Hoban: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what consultation he has held with (a) other Government departments and (b) other stakeholders on the implementation of the Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. 
The Government departments charged with implementation of the Gowers recommendations will consult with relevant departments across Whitehall and with other stakeholders before providing advice to Ministers on how best to take forward implementation of particular recommendations. A cross Whitehall Gowers Implementation Steering Group has been formed to ensure a joined-up government effort. Consultation documents on various issues will be released later this winter and in the spring, and informal engagement with stakeholders is already underway.
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate his Department has made of the cost of implementing the recommendations in the Gowers
Review of Intellectual Property; and what funds have been committed to its implementation. 
The majority of recommendations will be implemented using existing departmental resources. Recommendations with significant costs, such as the establishment of a Strategic Advisory Board and an annual intellectual property strategic analysis fund, will require additional funding (£150 000 for a Secretariat and £500 000 for the fund) which has been built into the 2007 Patent Office Corporate Plan and Budget.
As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking what the average life expectancy was in (a) the UK, (b) the North West and (c) Chorley constituency in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2006. (120878)
Life expectancy figures are published for local authorities rather than parliamentary constituencies, and are calculated as three year rolling averages. The table below provides the period life expectancy at birth for men and women in (a) the UK, (b) the North West government office region and (c) Chorley local authority district, in (i) 1996-98 and (ii) 2003-05 (the latest period available).
|Table 1: Period life expectancy at birth( 1) , UK, North West Government office region, Chorley local authority district, 1996-98 and 2003-05( 2,3)|
|Year( 3)||Life expectancy||95 per cent. confidence interval( 4)||Life expectancy||95 per cent confidence interval( 4)|
|(1) Period life expectancy at birth is an estimate of the average number of years a newborn baby would survive if he or she experienced the area's age-specific mortality rates for that time period throughout his or her life. The figure reflects mortality among those living in the area in each time period, rather than mortality among those born in each area. It is not therefore the number of years a baby born in the area in each time period could actually expect to live, both because the death rates of the area are likely to change in the future and because many of those born in the area will live elsewhere for at least some part of their lives. (2) Using Government office region and local authority boundaries as of 2006 for all the years shown. (3) Three year rolling averages, based on deaths registered in each year and mid-year population estimates. (4) Confidence intervals are a measure of the statistical precision of an estimate and show the range of uncertainty around the estimated figure. Calculations based on small numbers of events are often subject to random fluctuations. As a general rule, if the confidence interval around one figure overlaps with the interval around another, we cannot say with certainty that there is more than a chance difference between the two figures.|
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|