Previous Section Index Home Page

1 Mar 2007 : Column 1463W—continued

Education and Skills

Departments: Missing Persons

Helen Southworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills on how many occasions his Department has been represented at a meeting of the Missing Persons Strategic Oversight Group since May 2004; and on what dates this occurred. [124097]

Mr. Dhanda [holding answer 28 February 2007]: The establishment of a Missing Persons Strategic Oversight Group was a recommendation of the Nove Review of the Police National Missing Persons Bureau in 2005, which proposed the establishment of a permanent oversight group drawn from statutory bodies and the voluntary sector. The group is chaired by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and supported by the Home Office.

DfES fully recognises the importance of the group’s work and we are represented on it by officials, as part of our continuing commitments to cross-Government liaison on runaways and missing persons matters.

There have been two official group meetings, in March and November 2006. DfES attended in November. An ‘extraordinary’ meeting in April 2006 enabled us to catch up on issues from the March meeting.

Family Courts: Manpower

Annette Brooke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the sickness rates for children and family court advisory and support services practitioners in (a) public law and (b) private law were in each of the last three years. [122548]

Mr. Dhanda [holding answer 22 February 2007]: This is a matter for the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS). Anthony Douglas, the chief executive, has written to the hon. Member with this information requested and a copy of his reply has been placed in the House Library.

Letter from Anthony Douglas, dated 22 February 2007:


1 Mar 2007 : Column 1464W
Sickness absence rate (Percentage)

2004-05

4.7

2005-06

3.5

2006 to date

4.2


Independent Schools

Mr. Andy Reed: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) how many independent schools there were in each year since 1997; [123184]

(2) how many children aged five to 16 years were educated in independent schools in each year since 1997. [123190]

Jim Knight: Figures provided here relate to pupils of compulsory school age (aged five to 15). Pupils aged 15 on 31 August will become 16 during the school year.

Independent schools( 1) : Number of schools and number of pupils aged five-15— Position in January each year: 1997 to 2006 England
Number of schools Number of pupils( 2)

1997

2,256

405,790

1998

2,227

410,270

1999

2,214

413,130

2000

2,187

416,380

2001

2,188

423,220

2002

2,190

429,240

2003

2,160

432,690

2004

2,302

438,070

2005

2,250

434,750

2006

2,261

434,260

(1) Excludes city technology colleges and academies.
(2) Age as at 31 August in the previous year.
Note:
The number of pupils have been round to the nearest 10.
Source:
Schools’ census

Music: Education

Paul Holmes: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much each independent music service provider received from his Department for the purpose of providing music education in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. [123857]

Jim Knight: The Music Standards Fund (MSF) has been paid to local authorities since 1999/2000. Local authorities are responsible for procuring music services for their schools with this funding and some choose to do this by contracting with independent music service providers. Information is not held centrally on which authorities use these services.

In addition to the MSF, the Music and Dance Scheme provides funding for music education and training through the Aided Pupil Scheme at four independent specialist boarding schools and new national grants available at nine regional centres for advanced training (£12.5 million in 2006-07). The money includes outreach/partnership grants for working with state schools. From 2006/07, we will be providing additional funding to strengthen these partnerships.


1 Mar 2007 : Column 1465W

Runaway Children

Helen Southworth: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what guidance is in place in relation to a child who runs away from their home local authority area into another authority area. [124095]

Mr. Dhanda [holding answer 28 February 2007]: It is a statutory responsibility for every local authority children's services to safeguard children in their area, including runaways, and local authorities have a duty to promote co-operation between all those who work with children.

Government issued ‘Children Missing from Care and Home—a guide to good practice’ in tandem with the Social Exclusion Unit's report ‘Young Runaways’, in 2002. This includes information for local authorities and their partner agencies on responding both to children in care who go missing from their placements and also to children who go missing from their homes. This guidance states that where runaways from one area present themselves in another local authority area, it will be important that the “receiving” authority negotiates with their “home” authority so that, if necessary, these children can be linked back into appropriate services that are local to their families.

Schools: Muslims

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what assessment he has made of the document “Towards Greater Understanding: Meeting the needs of Muslim pupils in state schools” produced by the Muslim Council of Britain and launched by the Chief Advisor for London Schools on 21 February; [123790]

(2) whether he had been informed of the content of the document “Towards Greater Understanding: Meeting the needs of Muslim pupils in state schools” prior to it being launched by the Chief Advisor for London Schools. [123789]

Jim Knight: The Muslim Council of Britain sent a draft copy of the document to the Secretary of State last autumn. The Secretary of State has made no specific assessment or endorsement of the document and there is no expectation on schools to adopt any of the specific recommendations made by the Muslim Council for Britain. Government believe that all schools have an ethos which encourages social responsibility, high aspirations, good citizenship and mutual understanding; and that schools recognise the cultural and faith needs of all pupils.

Secondary Education: Curriculum

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, columns 709-10W, on secondary education: curriculum, (1) what steps he expects schools to take to evaluate the effectiveness of any innovative curriculum plan they adopt; [123300]

(2) what the key elements of curriculum content that have stood the test of time are; [123304]


1 Mar 2007 : Column 1466W

(3) whether the programme of study in science at Key Stage 4 will adopt the common format of the new programmes of study; [123305]

(4) whether cross-curricular themes will be a statutory part of the national curriculum; [123306]

(5) when he plans to consult on the guidance for teachers on tracking the progress of pupils and on how they grasped the key concepts and skills in each curriculum subject. [123307]

Jim Knight: It is for schools to decide the way in which they will evaluate the effectiveness of any innovative curriculum plan they undertake. All school activities are subject to inspection by Ofsted, and one of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority's specific responsibilities is to monitor the curriculum and to report on developments in the national curriculum subjects.

There are a number of key elements of the curriculum that have stood the test of time and which will remain at the forefront of what the next generation learn. For example:

The recent changes to the science curriculum at Key Stage 4 give teachers more flexibility to communicate the excitement of science. The new Key Stage 3 science curriculum has been reviewed to complement the key Stage 4 programme of study so that science teaching for all age groups is integrated and engaging for pupils. There are no plans to change the format of the Key Stage science programme of study.

Cross-curricular themes will not be a statutory requirement of the revised secondary curriculum. It will be for schools to decide how best to deliver the new curriculum to meet the needs of pupils.

The guidance for teachers which will help them track the progress of their pupils, including how well they have grasped the key concepts and skills in each curriculum subject, will be developed by the QCA with input from other experts. There are no plans for a consultation on the guidance.

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, columns 709-10W, on secondary education: curriculum, in what way removing overlap and highlighting connections between subjects will create time for teachers to personalise their teaching. [123301]

Jim Knight: Eliminating overlaps between subjects allows scope for teaching key concepts and themes such as sustainability and diversity across the whole curriculum.


1 Mar 2007 : Column 1467W

Reducing the amount of overly detailed factual content in the curriculum will free up time in the school timetable. Schools and teachers can use that time to give more lessons in English and mathematics to pupils struggling with the basics, and to give opportunities for other pupils to extend their learning in areas in which they have particular interests and aptitudes. This moves us away from a one-size-fits-all curriculum to one that offers more flexibility to tailor teaching to pupils' needs and aspirations.

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, columns 709-10W, on secondary education: curriculum, how he plans to assess whether schools are (a) providing effective catch-up lessons where needed and (b) creating opportunities for pupils to deepen and extend their learning where they have particular interests and aptitudes. [123302]

Jim Knight: We will assess the effectiveness of the new secondary curriculum through QCA’s monitoring reports and Ofsted inspection reports. We will examine the key stage 3 national curriculum test results and attainment levels in GCSE and equivalent qualifications. We will monitor post-16 participation rates to see whether or not the revised secondary curriculum has been successful in engaging and challenging young people so that more are encouraged to remain in education and training for longer.

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 20 February 2007, Official Report, columns 709-10W, on secondary education: curriculum, whether he plans to make (a) providing catch-up lessons where needed and (b) creating opportunities for pupils to deepen and extend their learning where they have particular interests and aptitudes compulsory elements of the national curriculum. [123303]

Jim Knight: We fully expect that schools will want to take advantage of the increased flexibility offered by the revised secondary curriculum to provide catch-up lessons where needed and to create opportunities for pupils to deepen and extend their learning where they have particular interests and aptitudes. However, it will not be a statutory requirement of the national curriculum. It will be for schools to decide how best to deliver the new curriculum to meet the needs of pupils.

Teachers: Training

Mr. Dunne: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many teachers in each local education authority in the West Midlands are to be given training on how to search pupils and use techniques to calm pupils. [123749]

Jim Knight: As stated in our draft guidance, which is now published for consultation, any head teacher who chooses to authorise staff to search pupils, should arrange training for all staff whom they authorise. The Department will not collect data on numbers being trained.


1 Mar 2007 : Column 1468W

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance

Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what representations she has received on the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance from (a) the Government of France and (b) the Governments of all other signatories to the Convention. [122427]

Mr. McCartney: The Government of France invited my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary to sign the treaty at the signing ceremony in Paris on 6 February. The UK declined because the UK does not sign international treaties unless it has a firm intention to ratify within a reasonable time frame. We have received no formal representation from any other signatory regarding the convention.


Next Section Index Home Page