Previous Section Index Home Page

27 Mar 2007 : Column 1432W—continued



27 Mar 2007 : Column 1433W

27 Mar 2007 : Column 1434W
UK regular forces other ranks by top level budget and NATO rank( 1) at 1 April 2006
Number
O R -9 O R -8( 4) O R -7 O R -6 O R -4 O R -3( 3,4) O R -2 O R -1( 3) Total

Operational TLBs

126,440

Commander-in-Chief Fleet(2)

590

680

3,150

3,880

5,740

200

13,250

10

27,500

Commander-in-Chief Land

970

2,790

4,100

7,690

11,750

12,740

26,050

840

66,950

General Officer Commanding Northern Ireland

70

200

250

520

890

910

1,660

30

4,520

Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief RAF Strike Command

670

30

1,960

4,100

5,930

100

11,090

50

23,940

Chief of Joint Operations

100

100

300

550

890

310

1,280

20

3540

Support TLBs

36,320

Adjutant General

390

930

1,090

1,690

2,430

960

900

9,840

18,220

Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief RAF Personnel and Training Command

220

40

790

1,650

1,780

40

1,080

940

6,530

Defence Logistics Organisation

370

260

1,240

780

670

90

510

(5)

3,910

Central

330

470

1,000

1,580

2,000

490

1,200

40

7,110

Defence Estates

20

30

10

10

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

80

Corporate Science and Technology

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

Defence Procurement Agency

80

60

200

110

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

460

Trading Funds

(5)

(5)

10

10

10

(5)

10

(5)

50

Defence Science and Technology Laboratories

(5)

(5)

10

10

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

20

Meteorological Office

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

UK Hydrographic Office

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

Defence Aviation Repair Agency

(5)

(5)

(5)

10

10

(5)

10

(5)

30

Army Base Repair Organisation

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

(5)

Unallocated

10

(5)

20

40

60

(5)

210

(5)

340

(1 )No Service have personnel at NATO Rank OF-10.
(2) 2(nd) Sea Lord/Commander-in-Chief Naval Home Command TLB has closed, personnel now belong to Commander-in-Chief Fleet TLB. Operational and support personnel are therefore consolidated within the one Navy TLB.
(3) The Naval Service has no personnel at NATO Ranks OR-1 or OR-3
(4) The Royal Air Force has no personnel at NATO Ranks OR-3 or OR-8
(5) zero or rounded to zero.
Notes:
1. Due to the introduction of a new Personnel Administration System for RAF, 1 April 2006 RAF Budgetary data are provisional and subject to review.
2. Due to the rounding methods used, totals may not always equal the sum of the parts. When rounding to the nearest 10, numbers ending in 5 have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias.
Source:
DASA (Tri-Service)

Armed Forces: Divorce

Mark Pritchard: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many armed forces personnel were granted a divorce in (a) 2005 and (b) 2006 who (i) have since left the armed forces and (ii) are still serving. [122196]

Derek Twigg: The following tables provide the number of Army and RAF personnel divorcing in 2005 and 2006, broken down by divorcees who have subsequently left the armed forces and those still serving. Naval service data are not available as the Naval service groups ‘Separated’, ‘Divorced’ and ‘Widowed’ together.

Figures are for UK regular forces, and therefore exclude Gurkhas, full-time reserve service personnel, the Home Service battalions of the Royal Irish Regiment and mobilised reservists. Figures are for trained and untrained personnel excluding officer designates.

The term ‘divorce’ includes ‘decree absolute’ and ‘marriage annulled’. It excludes ‘decree nisi’ and individuals who are separated.

Army
2005 2006

Number of divorces

1,040

900

Divorcees still serving as at 1 January 2007

890

870

Divorcees subsequently leaving the armed forces

160

40


RAF
2005 2006

Number of divorces

570

n/a

Divorcees still serving as at 1 January 2007

480

n/a

Divorcees subsequently leaving the armed forces

90

n/a

Notes:
‘n/a’ denotes not available. Due to the introduction of a new personnel administration system, RAF data are not available.
Due to the rounding methods used, totals may not always equal the sum of the parts. When rounding to the nearest 10, numbers ending in five have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias.

In compiling this data a small error has been discovered in the RAF data given in my reply of 19 February 2007, Official Report, column 202W, to the hon. Member for Forest Dean (Mr. Harper) for which I apologise.

The error does not substantially alter the estimates of divorce rates in the RAF.


Next Section Index Home Page