Previous Section Index Home Page

27 Mar 2007 : Column 1502W—continued

Social Security Benefits: Carers

Martin Horwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the adequacy of the level of benefits provided to carers working more than 35 hours per week who receive (a) income support, (b) jobseeker's allowance and (c) the carer's allowance; what the basis is for the differences in the amounts paid via the different channels; and if he will make a statement. [128477]

Mrs. McGuire: These benefits are designed to help carers in very different circumstances. Income support and the income-based element of jobseekers allowance, both of which include extra help for carers, are intended to ensure that people of working age and their families can meet all their normal daily living needs when they are out of work. Carer's allowance provides a measure of income-maintenance to those carers who provide at least 35 hours of care each week for a severely disabled person, but who are not entitled to additional means-tested support from the benefit system.

We have introduced improvements for carers in all these benefits, in addition to the normal annual uprating. We also review the adequacy of these benefits at regular intervals.


27 Mar 2007 : Column 1503W

Social Security Benefits: Disabled

Mr. Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what recent estimate his Department has made of the cost of increasing the earning disregard for (a) incapacity benefit, (b) income support for incapacity and (c) carer's allowance. [127819]

Mrs. McGuire: Part-time work while on incapacity benefit is covered by the permitted work rules and while on carer’s allowance by an earnings limit, rather than the earnings disregards.

DWP has no reliable estimate of the cost of changing the earnings disregard limit in income support for sick and disabled people. The cost varies widely according to the nature of the change being proposed.

Social Security Benefits: Fraud

Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what projects his Department has undertaken with the Staffordshire Police Authority to combat fraudulent activities in relation to benefits in the last 12 months. [128330]

Mr. Plaskitt: Investigators from the Department for Work and Pensions collaborates with officers from Staffordshire police authority on cases where they have a common interest and where the Department requires police assistance.

An example of current joint working with Staffordshire police authority is Operation Oblique. This was set up to investigate a number of girocheques which were reported as missing but were subsequently discovered to have been cashed. The investigation is continuing and at least one person has so far been arrested.

As well as investigations relating to benefit fraud, DWP also works with Staffordshire police on investigations which relate to the integrity of the national insurance number system.

State Retirement Pensions

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what methodology the Government use to decide what annual pension increase to award. [129619]

James Purnell: The level of the uprating for state pensions is calculated using the increase in the retail prices index for the 12 months ending in the preceding September. This enables us to complete the action necessary to ensure that the new rates for over 11 million pensioners are put into payment in April.

Treasury

Breast Cancer: Greater London

Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many women (a) were diagnosed with and (b) died from breast cancer in each of the last five
27 Mar 2007 : Column 1504W
years; and what the figures were for each London borough. [130241]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 27 March 2007:


27 Mar 2007 : Column 1505W
Table 1: registrations of newly diagnosed cases of malignant neoplasm of breast( 1) in females 2000-04: England and London boroughs( 2)
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

England

34,712

35,315

35,149

37,283

36,939

Barking and Dagenham

98

82

126

101

59

Barnet

203

213

215

171

200

Bexley

156

168

132

180

173

Brent

117

136

128

129

130

Bromley

216

254

250

257

221

Camden

113

97

81

107

123

Croydon

218

200

244

187

223

Ealing

149

161

129

186

137

Enfield

158

188

164

159

152

Greenwich

131

134

146

129

114

Hackney

115

79

85

101

67

Hammersmith and Fulham

91

85

64

88

62

Haringey

109

113

87

112

98

Harrow

153

133

141

172

130

Havering

148

169

138

195

168

Hillingdon

129

126

152

126

130

Hounslow

121

98

95

120

99

Islington

97

81

87

79

63

Kensington and Chelsea

82

113

109

94

68

Kingston Upon Thames

120

109

110

99

98

Lambeth

144

101

146

126

137

Lewisham

125

140

147

112

137

Merton

109

119

109

144

102

Newham

78

87

99

79

91

Redbridge

124

147

114

162

141

Richmond Upon Thames

122

100

129

145

104

Southwark

123

124

131

137

115

Sutton

125

128

89

129

90

Tower Hamlets

72

66

67

75

82

Waltham Forest

123

105

108

115

86

Wandsworth

117

134

156

138

148

Westminster

126

124

124

147

87

(1) Malignant neoplasm of breast is defined as code C50 in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD 10).
(2) Using 2007 local authority boundaries for all years shown.
Source:
Office for National Statistics

Next Section Index Home Page