Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
23 Apr 2007 : Column 963Wcontinued
Table 2 shows information on the number of optical practitioners (headcount) for 1997 for Greenwich and Bexley Health Authority (HA). The latest information available in Table 3 shows the number of optical practitioners (headcount) for Bexley Care Trust in 2005.
Table 2: Ophthalmic workforce for Greenwich and Bexley HA as at 31 December 1997 | |
1997 | |
Notes: 1. Some practitioners included in this table may also have held a contract with another HA. 2. These figures do not take into account the level of activity (if any) of each practitioner. 3. Practitioners include Ophthalmic opticians and Ophthalmic Medical Practitioners. Source: The Information Centre for health and social care, Ophthalmic Statistics |
Table 3: Ophthalmic workforce for Bexley Care Trust as at 31 December 2005 | |
2005 | |
Notes: 1. Some practitioners included in this table may also have held a contract with another PCT. 2. These figures do not take into account the level of activity (if any) of each practitioner. 3. Practitioners include Ophthalmic opticians and Ophthalmic Medical Practitioners. 4. The 2005 figures are affected by the changes in the General Ophthalmic Services (GOS) regulations introduced on 1 April 2005. 5. Work force figures for 2006 are not currently available. These will be published in summer 2007. Source: The Information Centre for health and social care, Ophthalmic Statistics |
General practitioner data are not available at the specific years of 1997 and 2006 for Bexley. Data are only available at PCT level.
Table 4 shows number of general practitioners working within the Bexley Care Trust for years 2005 (latest data available) and 2001 (year the care trust was created).
Table 4: General medical practitioners (excluding GP registrars and GP retainers( 1) ) working in Bexley Care Trust, as at 30 September each year | ||||
Number (headcount) and full- time equivalents | ||||
2001 | 2005 | |||
Number | FTE | Number | FTE | |
1 General medical practitioners (excluding GP Registrars and GP Retainers) includes Contracted GPs, GMS Others, PMS Others. Note: The Care Trust was created in 2001. Source: The Information Centre for health and social care, General and Personal Medical Services Statistics |
David Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) why the cost of stent devices used in endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm is met by primary care trusts; and if she will make a statement; [122631]
(2) what recent representations she has received on the inclusion of the stent device used in endovascular repair of aortic aneurysm on the list of exclusions from payment by results funding. [122640]
Ms Rosie Winterton: In consultation with the national health service and industry, the list of drug and device exclusions from the payment by results has been increased. This ensures that care which includes the use of expensive drugs and/or devices is adequately rewarded. This is part of an annual cycle, which aims to ensure the tariff takes account of the introduction of new drugs and devices.
The payment by results team have had representations about the funding of endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms under tariff. These include queries direct from clinicians, and through a questionnaire issued last year to seek feedback from the NHS on the funding of specialised services. Aortic
stents are excluded from payment by results in order to help address these concerns. The Department has had no representations that the exclusion of aortic stents is inappropriate.
Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many hospital-acquired infections were diagnosed in each year between 1997 and 2006, broken down by type of infection in each strategic health authority. [130986]
Mr. Ivan Lewis:
The information requested is not available. The best available information is from the mandatory surveillance system, which provides data on
the number of reports of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) blood stream infections (bacteraemias) from April 2001 to 31 March 2006, the number of reports of Clostridium difficile for patients aged 65 and over from January 2004 to September 2006 are shown in the table and the number of glycopeptide resistant enterococci (GRE) blood stream infections from 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2005.
Data has been extracted from HCAI: Quarterly Reporting Results for Clostridium difficile Infections and MRSA Bacteraemia, as published in January 2007. Data for glycopeptides resistant enterococci blood stream infections was extracted from the mandatory surveillance of the healthcare associated infection report 2006 published in July 2006.
Table 1: Annual counts of Clostridium difficile (January 2004 to September 2006) | |||
SHA | Number of C.difficile reports for patients > 65 years January to December 2004 | Number of C.difficile reports for patients > 65 years January to December 2005 | Number of C.difficile reports for patients > 65 years January to September 2006 |
Table 2: Annual counts of MRSA bacteraemia April 2001 to March 2006 | |||||
April to March each year | |||||
MRSA bacteraemia reports | |||||
SHA | 2001 - 02 | 2002 - 03 | 2003 - 04 | 2004- 05 | 2005- 06 |
Table 3: Annual counts of glycopeptide resistant enterococci blood stream infections from 1 October 2003 to 30 September 2005 | ||
1 October to 30 September each year | ||
Glycopeptide resistant enterococci reports | ||
SHA | 2003- 04 | 2004-0 5 |
(1) 0ne trust missing data for all four quarters. (2) 0ne trust missing data for two quarters. |
Mr. Lansley:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 21 March 2007, Official Report, column 1012W, on hospitals: infectious disease,
if she will publish the evidential basis for her statement that recent information suggests no difference between in-house and contract cleaning with respect to hospital-acquired infections; when she first asked for studies into the possible links between hospitals with different cleaning arrangements and (a) MRSA and (d) clostridium difficile; when officials in her Department first received the results of these studies; and if she will place copies of the results of these studies in the Library. [130411]
Mr. Ivan Lewis: Preliminary statistical analysis suggests that, other things being equal, hospitals with contract cleaning do not have statistically significantly different rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia (bloodstream infection) to those with in-house cleaning. This is the result of on-going analysis by the Department into the relationship between MRSA rates and a variety of hospital characteristics, the results of which will be finalised and published later this year. Preliminary analysis also suggests that there is also no significant relationship between type of cleaning service and clostridium difficile rates.
This work was not formally commissioned but statistical analysis has been ongoing since 2004 and Ministers have been kept informed of emerging results since that time. This work forms part of ongoing work in the Department aimed at better understanding variations in health care associated infections and their implications for policy.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |