Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
6 Jun 2007 : Column 601Wcontinued
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what research she has (a) initiated and (b) evaluated on the effectiveness of funding provided for Hampshire Family Mediation as a result of the restructuring of legal aid; and if she will make a statement. [140666]
Vera Baird:
The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has researched the impact upon mediation services of its proposals for a revised mediation remuneration structure,
which aligns the for profit (FP) and not for profit (NfP) sectors onto the same fee scheme. The partial regulatory impact assessment concluded that 70 per cent. of the 200 mediation service providers will gain financially under the proposals. In common with other mediation providers, Hampshire Family Mediation (HFM) will no longer receive the fixed annual payment in addition to fees for work done, provided for the last three years, under the transitional NfP contracting arrangements. Under the new arrangements, HFM will be paid through new increased fixed fees, which will apply equally to both FP and NfP providers.
The LSCs proposals to revise the family fee structure will remove the financial disincentives for solicitors to make referrals to mediation, which has historically been alleged by the mediation profession to be an obstacle to increasing mediation referrals. The new family fee schemes for solicitors should encourage more and earlier referrals to mediation providers.
Mr. Jeremy Browne: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many and what percentage of prisoners released under the home detention curfew scheme were subsequently recalled in each year since the scheme's introduction. [140777]
Mr. Sutcliffe: I refer the hon. Gentleman to my answer of 4 June 2007, Official Report, columns 219-20W, on how many and what percentage of prisoners released under the home detention curfew scheme breached the rules of their curfew and were recalled to prison in each year since 1999.
Mr. Jeremy Browne: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many and what percentage of prisoners were released (a) one month, (b) two months, (c) three months, (d) four months, (e) five months and (f) six months or more before their automatic release date as part of the Home Detention Curfew scheme in each year since the schemes introduction. [140778]
Mr. Sutcliffe: Information on the numbers of prisoners by their respective times spent on the scheme from all prison establishments in England and Wales in each year since 1999 can be found in the following table. The maximum period under which a prisoner may be released early under the Home Detention Curfew scheme is 135 days. Prisoners are not released for longer than that period. Therefore no prisoner has been released on HDC five or six months before the end of their sentence.
These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.
Ms Abbott: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many legal aid cases were funded in Greater London under (a) the criminal and (b) the civil legal aid scheme in the latest 12 month period for which figures are available, broken down by (i) type of case and (ii) borough. [138981]
Vera Baird: I have placed the information requested in the House of Commons Library.
Mr. Holloway: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many magistrates courts in (a) Kent and (b) England and Wales closed in the last 10 years for which records are available. [140807]
Ms Harman: There have been four magistrates courts closures in Kent and 113 magistrates courts closures in England and Wales, in the last 10 years for which records are available.
Mr. Heald: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what work has been carried out for her Department or its predecessor since 2004 by (a) Deborah Mattinson and (b) Opinion Leader Research. [140728]
Bridget Prentice: No payments have been made directly to Deborah Mattinson. OCJR and NOMS (now part of the Ministry of JusticeMoJ) have not made any payments to OLR since becoming MoJ on 9 May. There have been four items contracted from Opinion Leader Research since 2004. Details of these, along with payments made to date, are as follows:
Mr. David Jones: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what the value is of (a) phase one and (b) phase two of the Ministry of Justice Innovation Fund. [140718]
Bridget Prentice: The total amount spent on the first round of the Innovation Fund was £102,000 (including VAT). Eight projects received funding in the 2006-07 financial year.
The total available funding budget for the second phase of the Innovation Fund is £140,000 (including VAT) to be spread over a 15-month period. Bids between £5,000 and £15,000 are being sought.
Mr. Holloway: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice what the (a) certified normal capacity for prisons in Kent and (b) prison population in Kent is. [140808]
Mr. Sutcliffe: I believe the hon. member is referring to the certified normal accommodation (CNA), which is the uncrowded capacity.
The CNA for each prison in Kent, excluding Dover, which holds immigration detainees, and the population for each prison, as at 4 June 2007, is set out in the following table. The total population figure includes temporary approved absences.
Prison | CNA | Total population |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |