Previous Section Index Home Page

21 Jun 2007 : Column 2132W—continued


Reoffenders

David T.C. Davies: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many offenders made the subject of each type of community supervision by the courts were sent to prison for (a) further offending during the duration of the order and (b) otherwise breaching the conditions of the order in each of the last six years for which figures are available. [144134]

Mr. Sutcliffe: Information for England and Wales on the completion rates for the main types of community sentence, for each year since 1995, can be found in Table 5.1 of the Home Office Statistical Bulletin: Offender Management Caseload Statistics 2005, a copy of which can be found in the House of Commons Library. This information shows the number of community sentences which are terminated due to further offences being committed by the offender or for failure to comply with the requirements of the sentence. Information on the number of offenders received into prison in each of the last six years for breaching community sentences is shown as follows. Information on the number of offenders who are sent to prison for committing further offences during community supervision is not centrally available.


21 Jun 2007 : Column 2133W
Prison receptions for breach of community orders
Number

2001

2,185

2002

4,604

2003

2,954

2004

3,900

2005

4,464

2006

6,368


These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems, which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.

Strikes: Shrewsbury

Mr. Clapham: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice if he will initiate an inquiry into the arrest, prosecution and conviction of the 24 building workers in 1972, known as the Shrewsbury 24, and the subsequent treatment they have received whilst serving their jail sentences; and if he will place copies of the documents held by his Department relating to the case in the Library. [143701]

Mr. Sutcliffe: Any person who believes they have been the victim of a miscarriage of justice can apply to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) for a review of their case. The CCRC has the power to review possible miscarriages of justice in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, to gain access to documents and other material which may be relevant to its investigations, and to refer to the appropriate court any case in which there is a real possibility that the conviction will not be upheld. Unless, however, there are exceptional circumstances, the CCRC is not empowered to refer cases until the court appeal system has been exhausted. It is open to prisoners and former prisoners to seek recompense through civil litigation for any alleged wrongdoing while in prison custody.

We are not aware of the existence of any documents of which copies might be placed in the Library.

Tickets: Touting

Mr. Swire: To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many prosecutions there were of ticket touts in each of the last five years. [144171]


21 Jun 2007 : Column 2134W

Mr. Sutcliffe: The offence of ticket touting, under section 166 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 applies to regulated football matches. This public order provision is used by police in a proportionate and targeted way when the segregation of supporters might be compromised. Detailed information on football-related arrests has been collated by the Football Banning Orders Authority since the football season 2001-02, when the existing banning order framework was introduced. The following table provides details of prosecutions in respect of ticket touting offences.

Prosecutions under section 166 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, England and Wales, 2001-06 football seasons
Football season Prosecutions

2001-02

96

2002-03

56

2003-04

42

2004-05

72

2005-06

47

Source:
Football Banning Orders Authority

Treasury

Aggregates Sustainability Levy Fund

Paul Holmes: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much of the Aggregates Sustainability Levy Fund was allocated to each of the fund’s eight national delivery partners in each year since the fund was established. [143551]

Barry Gardiner: I have been asked to reply.

The figures in the following table show the final allocations to the Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund’s national delivery partners in England in each of the financial years the fund has been running.

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

Natural England

5,100,000

English Nature

4,970,000

4,193,000

4,110,000

3,500,000

2,688,000

Countryside Agency

5,470,000

4,193,000

2,710,000

2,160,000

2,002,000

English Heritage

5,470,000

4,193,000

4,310,000

4,350,000

3,423,000

4,400,000

CEFAS (Marine)

950,000

1,300,000

910,000

2,500,000

Waste and Resources Action Programme

6,500,000

8,240,000

3,650,000

5,980,000

5,446,000

2,700,000

Minerals Industry Research Organisation

1,800,000

1,627,000

1,490,000

1,650,000

1,155,000

1,500,000

Department for Transport

400,000

2,200,000

2,849,000

1,400,000

Department of Trade and Industry

700,000

700,000

410,000

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

1,860,000

1,860,000

1,640,000

1,800,000

1,260,000


Paul Holmes: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much from the Aggregates Levy Fund was allocated to the fund’s objective of (a) minimising the demand for primary aggregates, (b) promoting environmentally friendly aggregates extraction on land, (c) promoting environmentally friendly aggregates extraction in the marine environment, (d) promoting environmentally friendly transport of aggregates, (e) addressing the environmental impacts of past aggregate extraction and (f) compensating local
21 Jun 2007 : Column 2135W
communities for the impacts of aggregates extraction in each year since the fund was established. [143624]

Barry Gardiner: I have been asked to reply.

The Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund’s four objectives are:


21 Jun 2007 : Column 2136W

The fourth objective was added in April 2005.

The figures in the following table show the approximate allocations between the four objectives in each of the financial years the fund has been running.

£
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08

First Objective

7,200,000

8,940,000

4,060,000

5,980,000

5,446,000

2,700,000

Second Objective

3,660,000

3,487,000

4,480,000

11,170,000

9,134,000

7,700,000

Third Objective

16,710,000

13,379,000

11,772,000

5,790,000

5,153,000

7,200,000

Fourth Objective

3,810,000

2,797,000

2,797,000


Paul Holmes: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much from the Aggregates Levy Fund was allocated to local authorities in each year since the fund was established. [143625]

Barry Gardiner: I have been asked to reply.

The figures in the following table show the final allocations to local authorities in each of the financial years the fund has been running.

£

2002-03

800,000

2003-04

800,000

2004-05

642,000

2005-06

3,810,000

2006-07

2,797,000

2007-08

2,797,000


Business: Education

Rosie Cooper: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many (a) schools and (b) businesses were involved in the Enterprise Summer School Scheme in West Lancashire constituency in 2006; and how many (i) have been and (ii) are expected to be involved in the scheme in 2007. [143529]

Jim Knight: I have been asked to reply.

The experimental 2006 Enterprise Summer School Scheme was managed for the Government by Young Enterprise, a leading educational charitable organisation. Nationally, we do not hold local information at the level of detail requested.

In light of evaluation, we are now considering how to develop enterprise summer schools. We have no plans for a further round of enterprise summer schools in 2007, but are developing options for future years.

Contracts: Medical Services

Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what involvement his Department had in negotiating the new contract for the delivery of general medical services agreed in June 2003. [143808]

Mr. Timms: The general medical services contract was negotiated between the General Practitioners Committee and the NHS Confederation.


Next Section Index Home Page