Previous Section Index Home Page

26 Jun 2007 : Column 693W—continued


26 Jun 2007 : Column 694W

Pensions: Advisory Services

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many home visits have been carried out by the Pension Service in each year since 1997, broken down by type of visit and local area. [141831]

James Purnell: The information that is available for the area of East Sussex is in the following table. I will write to the hon. Gentleman with information on the remaining areas and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Home visits carried out by the Pension Service
Nationally East Sussex

2004-05

549,369

2005-06

954,359

2006-07

897,702

9,687

Notes:
1. All visits are ‘Holistic Visits’ so whatever the reason for referral a full benefit entitlement check is undertaken.
2. The Pension Service Local Service was created in April 2004.
3. There are occasions when a follow up visit is requested by the pension centre to clarify some aspects of the application; however these are not recorded separately.
4. The number of visits at a cluster level is held on the Local Service System (LSS). The East Sussex cluster figures for the years 2004-05 and 2005-06 are not available because of data protection issues which means customer data 18 months from the date the referral is cleared.
Source
Local Service Management Information.

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the cost has been of the Pension Service’s outbound telephone campaign. [141876]

James Purnell: The information requested is not available. Outbound calls from the DWP are not broken down by campaign.

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the effect of the Pension Service’s (a) method of home visits, (b) outbound telephone campaign and (c) strategy of identifying harder-to-reach customers by working with local partners on take-up of services. [141878]

James Purnell: The information that is available is in the following tables.

Effect of home visits, 2006-07
Number

Visits made

897,702

Claims to various benefits

(1)481,434

(1) This includes claims made following Information Point appointments. There were 57,522 Information Point appointments during 2006-07.
Source:
Local Service Management Information.

Effect of the outbound telephone campaign, 2006-07
Number

Calls made

189,434

Awards of Pension Credit

21,340

Source:
“Contacts by Channel” and “Management Dashboard” report 2006-07.

26 Jun 2007 : Column 695W

Joint Working Partnerships targeting harder-to-reach groups are currently being evaluated and the findings will be available in the autumn.

Pensions: Financial Assistance Scheme

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what measures his Department has taken in conjunction with the financial assistance scheme (FAS) to raise the profile of the FAS among members of occupational schemes that come under its remit. [141882]

James Purnell: Since the inception of the financial assistance scheme (FAS), the main focus of our communications has been aimed at trustees and administrators in order to encourage them to apply for FAS and to supply the member data needed to make payments.

We currently provide information for members via our website at www.dwp.gov.uk/fas and we have worked with trustees on a scheme specific basis to provide information for their updates to members about the progress of the winding up.

We recognise the need to provide more clarity to members about the nature of FAS benefits, how they work and when they can expect payments. Lord McKenzie, announced in the Lords on 6 June that we are introducing arrangements so that, rather that relying on trustees to make applications on their behalf, individual scheme members who believe that they are eligible for payment can advise the FAS operational unit direct, which will then contact the scheme trustees to seek to arrange a payment.

Personal Accounts

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions whether (a) Ministers, (b) special advisers and (c) officials in his Department briefed Financial Times journalists on 13 June 2007 about the Government's plans on personal accounts; and if he will make a statement. [144078]

Mr. Hutton: No Financial Times journalists were briefed on 13 June 2007. There was regular communication between Ministers, special advisers and officials and our stakeholders, including journalists and other political parties, in the run up to the publication of our proposals on personal accounts.

State Second Pension

Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what assessment he has made of the impact on national insurance revenues of recent changes in the number of people contracted out of the state second pension. [141551]

James Purnell: The effect on national insurance revenues arising from recent changes in the number of people contracted out of the state second pension is broadly neutral over the longer term.


26 Jun 2007 : Column 696W

Education and Skills

Adoption: Foster Care

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills (1) what assessment he has made of (a) delays caused in adoption to fostered children going through the court process without a care order under section 31 of the Children’s Act 1989 and (b) the disruption in the care provided to such children caused by such delays; and if he will make a statement; [145730]

(2) what assessment he has made of the impact of a child not being subject to a care order under section 31 of the Children’s Act 1989 on the adoption process; and if he will make a statement. [145808]

Mr. Dhanda: The Government’s view is that delays in relation to the adoption of a child, whether or not the child is also the subject of care proceedings, are likely to be damaging and prejudicial to his/her welfare, to the extent that it may contribute to disruption. This is the case whether it arises from delays in processes that are the responsibility of local authorities, such as the operation of adoption panels, or those that arise in the family courts.

Cache Foundation Award in Caring for Children

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupils at the end of key stage 4 were entered for a Cache Foundation Award in Caring for Children in each of the last five years. [145727]

Jim Knight: The information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Children in Care: Greater London

Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children were forcibly removed from their parents by social services in each London borough in each of the last five years. [145218]

Mr. Dhanda: It would not be possible for local authority social services departments forcibly to remove a child of any age into their care in circumstances where parents do not consent to this. While social services departments and the police have powers to obtain emergency orders so that they can act immediately to protect a child, the Children Act 1989 does not permit local authorities to remove children from the care of their parents without referring the matter to a Court.

The number of children who were taken into care during the years ending 31 March 2002 to 2006 is shown in the following table.

‘Children taken into care’ are children who started to be looked after under the following legal statuses: interim or full care orders, and police protection or emergency protection or child assessment orders. They exclude children freed for adoption or for whom a placement order was granted, they exclude children under voluntary accommodation and they also exclude children under youth justice legal statuses.


26 Jun 2007 : Column 697W

26 Jun 2007 : Column 698W
Looked after children taken into care during the years ending 31 March 2002 to 2006( 1,2,3,4,5,6,7)
Number
( 3) 2002( 3) 2003( 2) 2004( 2) 2005( 2) 2006

England

7,400

8,100

7,500

7,700

7,600

London

1,310

1,740

1,540

1,550

1,570

Inner London

660

920

860

790

810

Camden

85

95

85

60

75

City of London

0

0

0

0

Hackney

20

45

70

65

45

Hammersmith and Fulham

50

70

40

35

45

Haringey

75

120

100

70

90

Islington

50

45

55

45

60

Kensington and Chelsea

35

30

45

30

30

Lambeth

50

45

65

80

65

Lewisham

40

65

85

80

65

Newham

75

140

85

60

100

Southwark

70

60

75

90

85

Tower Hamlets

45

40

60

85

75

Wandsworth

30

70

60

50

35

Westminster

35

95

40

40

45

Outer London

650

820

680

770

760

Barking and Dagenham

45

80

55

60

40

Barnet

45

80

65

60

55

Bexley

40

15

10

25

25

Brent

40

50

65

55

70

Bromley

30

50

55

35

20

Croydon

25

45

30

50

40

Ealing

45

70

55

75

70

Enfield

45

75

40

60

45

Greenwich

95

75

65

70

85

Harrow

10

20

20

30

15

Havering

5

20

20

20

35

Hillingdon

15

20

30

40

55

Hounslow

45

55

60

50

85

Kingston Upon Thames

10

5

10

15

10

Merton

40

35

15

30

15

Redbridge

35

30

15

15

20

Richmond Upon Thames

5

15

10

15

10

Sutton

15

10

10

35

15

Waltham Forest

50

70

40

30

50

(1 )Figures exclude children looked after under an agreed series of short term placements.
(2 )Figures are taken from the SSDA903 return which in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 covered all looked after children.
(3 )Figures are taken from the SSDA903 one-third sample survey.
(4 )Only the first occasion on which a child was taken into care in the year has been counted.
(5 )"Children taken into care" are children who started to be looked after under the following legal statuses: interim or full care orders, and police protection or emergency protection or child assessment orders. They exclude children freed for adoption or for whom a placement order was granted, they exclude children under voluntary accommodation and they also exclude children under youth justice legal statuses.
(6 )Historical figures may differ from older publications. This is mainly due to the implementation of amendments sent by some local authorities after the publication date of previous materials.
(7 )To maintain the confidentiality of each individual child, data at national level are rounded to the nearest 100 if they exceed 1,000 or to the nearest 10 otherwise. At local authority level, data are rounded to the nearest 5 and at region level, to the nearest 10. Where the number was 5 or less (other than 0) this has been suppressed and replaced with a hyphen (-).

Next Section Index Home Page