Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
19 July 2007 : Column 536Wcontinued
Manchester
Hackney
Lewisham
Liverpool
Kirklees
Newcastle upon Tyne
Newham
Nottinghamshire
Dudley
Leeds
Waltham Forest
Islington
Kent
Doncaster
Cumbria
Tower Hamlets
Leicester
Blackburn with Darwen
Sandwell
Barking and Dagenham
Barnsley
Durham
Middlesbrough
Plymouth
Sheffield
Lambeth
Thurrock
Derbyshire
Coventry
Torbay
Southwark
Stoke-on-Trent
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his latest estimate is of the number of school age pupils who have been prescribed drugs for (a) depression, (b) behaviour control and (c) mental health problems in each year from 1996-97 to 2006-07; and if he will make a statement. [149151]
Mr. Ivan Lewis: I have been asked to reply.
Information is not available on the number of school-aged children who have been prescribed medication for depression, behaviour control or other mental health problems. However, data are available on the number of prescriptions dispensed to children under 16 years and those aged 16 to 18 years in full time education.
Antidepressant drugs are classified under British National Formulary (BNF) section 4.3.
BNF 4.3: Antidepressant drugs | ||
Financial year | Items under 16 | Items 16 to 18 in full time education |
Drugs for behaviour control are classified under BNF section 4.4: Central Nervous System (CNS) stimulants and drugs used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. This section also contains Modafil which is used for daytime sleepiness associated with chronic pathological conditions including narcolepsy, obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, and chronic shift work.
BNF 4.4: CNS stimulants and drugs used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | ||
Financial year | Items u nder 16 | Items 16 to 18 in full time education |
Drugs for mental health problems are classified in BNF section 4.2: Drugs used in psychoses and related disorders.
Mr. Hayes: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what total amount of compensation claims was made against schools in the last 12 months; and if he will list the 10 highest such claims, identifying the nature of each case. [148184]
Jim Knight: The Department does not collect this information.
Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the rate of conception in young people under the age of 18 years was in each of the last 10 years. [150776]
Angela Eagle: I have been asked to reply.
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.
Letter from Colin Mowl, dated 19 July 2007:
The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent question asking what the rate of conception in young people under the age of 18 years was in each of the last 10 years. I am replying in her absence. (150776)
Available figures are estimates of the number of conceptions that resulted in a live birth, stillbirth or legal, termination.
The number and rate of conceptions to girls aged under 18 for England and Wales, 1996 to 2005 (the most recent year for which figures are available), are shown in the attached table. Figures for 2005 are provisional.
Conceptions by age: number and rate for England and Wales, 1996-2005( 1) | ||
Under 18 | ||
Number | Rate( 2) | |
(1) Figures for 2005 are provisional. (2) Rate per 1,000 females aged 15 to 17. |
Tim Loughton: To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) what budget was allocated to the Teenage Pregnancy Unit in each year since 2000; and what budget has been allocated to the unit for the next three years; [150777]
(2) what projects are being undertaken by the Teenage Pregnancy Unit; [150778]
(3) how many civil servants are working for the Teenage Pregnancy Unit; and what their job descriptions are; [150779]
(4) what percentage of teenage (a) mothers and (b) fathers were in education, training or employment in each of the last 10 years. [150780]
Beverley Hughes: The budget allocated to support delivery of the Teenage Pregnancy Strategy since its launch in 1999 is provided in the following table. The table identifies separately the amounts spent on: local implementation (paid through a local implementation grant to each top-tier local authority in England); and the amount retained by the Teenage Pregnancy Unit (TPU) to pay for aspects of the strategy that are best managed centrally, such as funding for the national media campaign. Budgets for the next Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR) period have not yet been fixed.
£ m illion | |||
Financial year | Local implementation | Central costs | Total |
(1 )Budgets in years 2003-04 to2005-06 included funding for the Sure Start Plus pilots |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |