Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Sep 2007 : Column 2029W—continued

Floods: Compensation

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what criteria apply to the allocation of funds being made available by regional development agencies to businesses experiencing losses during the recent floods; and if he will make a statement. [153603]

Mr. Timms: Several Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) covering areas affected by the recent floods have set up schemes to assist recovery for businesses suffering losses. In most cases these take the form of grants of up to £2,500 available to small and medium enterprises applying for assistance.

Additionally, Yorkshire Forward has announced a scheme primarily for companies with more than 50 employees, offering grants of up to £100,000 with the amount available dependent on the number of employees. This scheme is intended to cover costs that will not be met by business continuity insurance. Under this scheme, companies with fewer than 50 employees will also be considered on a case-by-case basis for grants larger than £2,500.

Details are available on the RDA websites.

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform whether farming businesses will be eligible for funds being made available to businesses which have suffered damage due to the recent flooding; and if he will make a statement. [153657]

Mr. Timms: Several Regional Development Agencies (RDAs) have set up schemes to provide small amounts of recovery support to businesses affected by the floods. These schemes operate under the European Commission’s de minimis State Aid regulation. Aid under this regulation is restricted in the agricultural sector. RDAs can and are giving aid to agricultural businesses/farmers if they are involved in the processing and marketing of agricultural products (subject to certain exclusions) and for diversified businesses (farm shops, farm parks etc.).


10 Sep 2007 : Column 2030W

The Government have great sympathy for farm businesses affected by the recent flooding. However Government policy is not to provide compensation for production losses.

Farmers have a wide range of successful risk and crisis management strategies at their disposal, including forward contracts, weather insurance, diversification and ‘self-insurance’ through saving and borrowing. An increasing number of farmers are making use of such tools and DEFRA is supporting their take up, by sponsoring risk and crisis management workshops in partnership with the industry.

Foreign Companies: Russia

Mr. Jamie Reed: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform which companies trading within the UK are (a) owned and (b) controlled by Russian companies. [151547]

Mr. Timms: This information is not held by Companies House or UK Trade and Investment.

Fuels: Prices

Alan Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform if he will assess, with reference to the experience of countries which have such a system, the merits of introducing in the UK a system of national fuel pricing. [153353]

Malcolm Wicks: Last year the Government carried out a full review of energy policy, culminating in a White Paper published in May this year. The Government continue to believe that fuel prices are best set through the interplay of supply and demand in an open, competitive and transparent market. Price signals which clearly reflect supply and demand conditions, including any local variations, are the most efficient way of bringing supply and demand together, through (for example) supply increase through investment in new supply capacity and demand reduction through investment in energy efficiency. Nationally regulated prices disguise these signals and may lead to waste, inefficiency and shortage as supplies fail to get to where they are most needed.

Homeworking

Lembit Öpik: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimate his Department has made of the number of people able to (a) work from home and (b) participate in flexible working; and what steps the Government are taking to allow more people to do so. [154818]

Mr. McFadden: The Department undertakes periodic surveys of flexible working, the most recent of which was the Third Work-Life Balance Employee Survey conducted in 2006. The research findings, published in March 2007, found that 90 per cent. of employees reported that at least one flexible working arrangement was available to them if they needed it—an increase from 85 per cent. in 2003. The survey also found that 23 per cent. of employees reported that working from home on a regular basis was available to them (an increase from 20 per cent. in 2003).


10 Sep 2007 : Column 2031W

We are encouraging flexible working through the introduction of the right to request flexible working which was introduced in April 2003 for parents of young and disabled children. In April 2007 we extended this right to carers of adults. We also encourage flexible working through providing detailed guidance and promoting the benefits. The business.link.gov.uk website has a number of interactive tools. Both employers and employees can access the ACAS telephone helpline.

Housing: Standards

Mrs. Lait: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what powers of entry trading standards officers have to domestic dwellings. [153518]

Mr. Thomas: The majority of trading standards legislation only gives trading standards officers powers of entry into premises that are being used for business purposes.

Trading standards officers may enter a residential property where it is also being used as a business premise. When entering premises that are a mix of domestic and business, it is common for trading standards officers to do so with a warrant and the presence of the police.

There are a few exceptions where trading standards officers may enter premises solely used as a dwelling, which generally relate to issues of health and safety or animal welfare.

Imports: ACP Countries

Mr. Andy Reed: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) what assessment he has made of the potential legal implications under the Cotonou Agreement of applying standard generalised system of preferences import duties on imports from Africa, Caribbean and Pacific non-least developed countries which are not in a position to enter into an economic partnership agreement with the EU by 1 January 2008; and if he will make a statement; [152088]

(2) what assessment he has made of the UK's responsibility under the Cotonou Agreement not to apply standard generalised system of preferences import duties on imports from Africa, Caribbean and Pacific non-least developed countries which are not in a position to enter into an economic partnership agreement with the EU by 1 January 2008; and whether he has taken legal advice on the matter. [152087]

Mr. Thomas: The UK Government’s 2005 position paper on Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) states that

This remains our position. We would be very happy to consider and implement a WTO compatible alternative if put forward by any member of the ACP. However, the ACP have made it clear that they are committed to completing EPA negotiations by the end of this year
10 Sep 2007 : Column 2032W
and the UK Government consider it a priority to work with them towards that goal.

In the event that the deadline is not met in any of the regions, our position is that we would like to see arrangements which are least disruptive to ACP exporters and that do not leave the ACP any worse off than they are under current arrangements.

Industrial Diseases: Compensation

John Mann: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what discussions have taken place with Capita on the outsourcing of miners' compensation claims to India. [154943]

Mr. Thomas: Capita made their initial proposal regarding off-shoring in 2006 since when detailed discussions have taken place with the Department. In reviewing the proposal, the Department was keen to ensure the stability of the Coal Health compensation process, taking into account the challenges associated with completing the compensation schemes over the next 18 months.

Industrial Disputes: Arbitration

Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what assessment his Department has made of the average cost to (a) the Government, (b) the employer and (c) the employee of an employment dispute (i) resolved through an employment tribunal, (ii) resolved through mediation and (iii) in which mediation was unsuccessful. [151349]

Mr. McFadden: The most recent assessment of average costs of employment disputes to employers and employees carried out by my Department was the 2003 Survey of Tribunal Applications. The next such survey is scheduled for the first half of 2008. Information on costs to the Government is provided in the annual reports of the Employment Tribunal Service. Average costs are not available for those cases going to mediation, as the Department does not conduct research on mediation of employment disputes outside of the Employment Tribunal System.

Industrial Disputes: Mediation

Mr. Heald: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what estimate he has made of the annual costs of informing parties in employment disputes of their local mediation service. [150847]

Mr. McFadden: The Government have recently consulted on the introduction of a new advice service on dispute resolution, to provide impartial advice about different methods of resolving disputes. Such a service could encourage appropriate cases towards early mediation. We will publish our response to the consultation in the autumn. The Government's estimate of the costs of a new advice service was set out in the partial regulatory impact assessment published in the consultation paper in March 2007, copies of which were placed in the House Libraries.


10 Sep 2007 : Column 2033W

Information Technology

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what support is offered to promote technology careers to those working in manufacturing sectors. [153305]

Mr. Timms: Government published "World Class Skills: Implementing the Leitch Review of Skills in England" on 18 July 2007. It sets out how Government will take forward the recommendations of the Leitch Review to ensure that manufacturing has a world class skills base to meet the challenges of technological advance. We will work closely with others to take forward the package Leitch has recommended including proposals for manufacturing.

Current support includes funding for Foundation Degrees and the Adult Apprenticeship Scheme to which the Learning and Skills Council has recently made available an additional £16.7 million. We have also established the National Skills Academy for Manufacturing which offers employers an opportunity to shape the content of skills training to meet the needs of the sector.

Insolvency

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many bankruptcy orders were made in each year since the implementation of the Enterprise Act 2002. [147074]

Mr. McFadden: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 11 July 2007, Official Report, column 1542W.

Insolvency: London

Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many residents in each London constituency filed for bankruptcy in each of the last five years. [153641]

Mr. McFadden: Table 1 shows the number of bankruptcies in each London constituency derived from postcodes provided by bankrupt individuals.

Classifying bankrupts into geographic areas is done using the postcode that the bankrupt individual provides. The use of this in assigning an individual to a constituency is thus as reliable as the postcode information provided.


10 Sep 2007 : Column 2034W

10 Sep 2007 : Column 2035W
Table 1
Bankruptcies
Constituency 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Barking

17

46

44

59

125

Battersea

14

35

32

55

74

Beckenham

24

30

39

71

100

Bethnal Green and Bow

65

81

96

126

157

Bexleyheath and Crayford

27

42

35

68

74

Brentford and Isleworth

25

33

58

71

112

Brent East

25

19

28

44

77

Brent North

13

19

29

33

56

Brent South

9

30

34

35

64

Bromley and Chislehurst

16

23

43

71

115

Camberwell and Peckham

25

33

87

93

92

Carshalton and Wallington

32

33

59

74

119

Chingford and Woodford Green

16

16

30

53

80

Chipping Barnet

33

30

42

73

84

Cities of London and Westminster

55

64

86

105

120

Croydon Central

30

38

49

74

92

Croydon North

34

35

54

76

104

Croydon South

21

23

36

57

86

Dagenham

23

36

42

73

99

Dulwich and West Norwood

26

54

87

89

100

Ealing, Acton and Shepherd’s Bush

21

24

45

78

82

Ealing North

16

32

48

57

83

Ealing, Southall

29

26

37

57

74

East Ham

22

39

50

63

98

Edmonton

20

28

34

39

54

Eltham

29

26

46

77

95

Enfield North

22

26

45

41

79

Enfield, Southgate

24

22

40

40

54

Erith and Thamesmead

39

42

64

89

105

Feltham and Heston

19

29

62

82

90

Finchley and Golders Green

19

32

51

69

78

Greenwich and Woolwich

27

41

44

80

102

Hackney North and Stoke Newington

36

33

61

72

106

Hackney South and Shoreditch

22

43

68

123

159

Hammersmith and Fulham

41

37

76

96

102

Hampstead and Highgate

32

45

68

81

99

Harrow East

30

31

36

54

88

Harrow West

20

24

28

44

65

Hayes and Harlington

15

29

32

62

74

Hendon

33

32

42

73

88

Holborn and St. Pancras

18

60

75

121

165

Hornchurch

12

23

34

46

60

Hornsey and Wood Green

32

34

60

61

124

Ilford North

21

27

40

65

85

Ilford South

22

37

40

54

80

Islington North

32

23

70

92

113

Islington South and Finsbury

35

53

72

107

130

Kensington and Chelsea

36

59

86

89

114

Kingston and Surbiton

43

31

61

64

97

Lewisham, Deptford

16

24

40

68

93

Lewisham East

20

19

34

57

76

Lewisham West

16

27

35

55

69

Leyton and Wanstead

11

21

39

49

76

Mitcham and Morden

32

43

54

70

66

North Southwark and Bermondsey

34

52

67

116

130

Old Bexley and Sidcup

21

28

51

54

56

Orpington

24

27

41

77

97

Poplar and Canning Town

43

65

97

117

138

Putney

16

19

38

47

45

Regent’s Park and Kensington North

53

64

82

131

147

Richmond Park

31

50

50

76

86

Romford

18

30

31

63

56

Ruislip-Northwood

14

22

24

50

59

Streatham

41

61

159

149

119

Sutton and Cheam

27

26

39

51

64

Tooting

18

33

23

38

45

Tottenham

22

28

53

74

93

Twickenham

46

29

49

52

83

Upminster

19

36

29

60

65

Uxbridge

18

23

27

51

69

Vauxhall

38

61

154

202

152

Walthamstow

12

27

42

56

90

West Ham

33

44

38

58

99

Wimbledon

11

21

37

37

39


Next Section Index Home Page