Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Sep 2007 : Column 2035W—continued


Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many residents in each London borough filed for bankruptcy in each of the last five years. [153642]

Mr. McFadden: Table 1 shows the number of bankruptcies in each London borough derived from postcodes provided by bankrupt individuals.

Classifying bankrupts into geographic areas is done using the postcode that the bankrupt individual provides. The use of this in assigning an individual to a borough is thus as reliable as the postcode information provided.


10 Sep 2007 : Column 2036W
Table 1: Bankruptcies
Borough 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Barking and Dagenham

40

82

86

132

224

Barnet

85

94

135

215

250

Bexley

66

89

119

178

182

Brent

47

68

91

112

197

Bromley

64

80

123

219

312

Camden

50

105

143

202

264

City of London

2

5

6

7

10

City of Westminster

82

99

123

169

190

Croydon

85

96

139

207

282

Ealing

55

74

108

154

194

Enfield

66

76

119

120

187

Greenwich

77

90

121

190

250

Hackney

58

76

129

195

265

Hammersmith and Fulham

52

45

98

134

147

Haringey

54

62

113

135

217

Harrow

50

55

64

98

153

Havering

49

89

94

169

181

Hillingdon

47

74

83

163

202

Hounslow

44

62

120

153

202

Islington

67

76

142

199

243

Kensington and Chelsea

60

83

125

149

181

Kingston upon Thames

55

46

79

89

130

Lambeth

95

154

372

403

319

Lewisham

52

70

109

180

238

Merton

43

64

91

107

105

Newham

61

98

112

150

243

Redbridge

51

73

95

143

195

Richmond upon Thames

65

64

81

103

136

Southwark

69

107

182

246

274

Sutton

59

59

98

125

183

Tower Hamlets

102

131

169

214

249

Waltham Forest

31

55

96

134

216

Wandsworth

48

87

93

140

164


Nanotechnology

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps his Department is taking to support the manufacturing of micro and nanotechnology. [153308]

Mr. Timms: The Government recognise that MicroNanotechnologies (MNT) have the potential to deliver enormous benefits for society and the economy from the development and manufacturing of new materials and devices, and are committed to supporting industry in harnessing the commercial opportunities offered by such new and emerging technologies, as outlined in our 10-year Science and Innovation Investment Framework, published in 2004.

The delivery mechanism for such support is now the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), which is a non-departmental public body reporting to the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. The TSB,
10 Sep 2007 : Column 2037W
comprising mainly experienced business leaders, identifies the new and emerging technologies critical to the growth of the UK economy into which government funding and activities can be directed.

Over the period 2005 to 2008, £320 million is available to businesses in the form of grants to support research and development in the technology areas identified by the TSB. This includes £90 million already invested in MNT via the following three mechanisms:

Future decisions on technology and funding priorities will lie with the TSB.

New Businesses: East Sussex

Mr. Waterson: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many new businesses established in (a) Eastbourne and (b) East Sussex received Government (i) funding and (ii) assistance in each of the last five years. [151368]

Mr. Timms: Between 2004 and 2006 Sussex Enterprise (the Business Link for Sussex) provided funding and assistance to 45 new businesses in Eastbourne and 172 new businesses in East Sussex, a breakdown by year follows. In this case, new businesses are defined as those that were less than 12 months old at the time of the assistance.

Eastbourne East Sussex

2006-07

21

79

2005-06

17

72

2004-05 (6 months only)

7

21


Before October 2004 it is not possible for Sussex Enterprise to provide figures as a new database was adopted at that time; nor is it possible for the data to be disaggregated further without incurring disproportionate cost.

Neither Eastbourne borough council nor East Sussex county council provided direct assistance to businesses over the course of the period.

Further data on the number of businesses receiving funding or assistance from other sources are not stored centrally.


Next Section Index Home Page