Previous Section Index Home Page

16 Oct 2007 : Column 938W—continued

Defence Export Services Organisation: Offices

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence where the overseas offices of the Defence Export Services Organisation are situated; when each office was established; how many staff are employed in each; and what the cost of each (a) was in (i) 2005-06 and (ii) 2006-07 and (b) is expected to be in 2007-08. [156339]


16 Oct 2007 : Column 939W

Des Browne: The information on overseas offices of the Defence Export Services Organisation (DESO) is set out in the following table. The entries for Kuwait and Saudi Arabia refer to trade promotion offices. These are separate from the Project Offices in those countries, information about which I gave the hon. Member in a written answer on 9 October 2007, Official Report, column 504W. The two project offices were established in Saudi Arabia in 1987, and in Kuwait in 1993. Customer governments meet the costs of the project offices and I am withholding that information as its release would be likely to prejudice relations with those governments.

DESO Overseas Offices
Office Date established Staff numbers April 2007( 1) Cost 2005-06 (£000)( 2) Cost 2006-07 (£000)( 2) Cost 2007-08 (£000)( 2)

Kuwait

1988

2

89

128

135

India

1984

5

177

136

177

Libya

2006

1

60

114

UAE

1999

2

77

101

81

Qatar(3)

1998

1

100

91

27

Oman

2003

3

204

218

238

Saudi Arabia

2004

1

95

101

103

Brunei

1995

2

117

125

130

Australia

1989

2

84

81

100

South Korea

1988

3

184

269

242

Japan

2003

2

145

107

169

Singapore(4)

2001

0

98

160

-

Malaysia

1986

5

190

173

167

Vietnam

2005

1

7

16

17

Turkey

1998

1

32

31

41

Chile

2003

2

134

175

92

Romania

2004

2

110

141

144

Greece

2000

2

117

130

141

Brazil

2003

1

12

12

15

South Africa

2000

1

82

88

80

Trinidad and Tobago(5)

2005

111

24

(1) Figures include locally employed staff. Part-time staff are counted as whole. (2) Costs for 2007-08, and some costs in the earlier years, have been estimated. (3) Office closed June 2007. (4) Office closed in March 2007 (5) Post discontinued January 2007.

Departments: Secondment

Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many staff are seconded to his Department from outside Government; from which outside body each has been seconded; and what the length is of each secondment. [157864]

Derek Twigg: This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at a disproportionate cost.

Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft

Mr. Cameron: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what progress has been made on the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft programme; and if he will make a statement. [157953]


16 Oct 2007 : Column 940W

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: AirTanker Ltd, the Department’s Preferred Bidder, is currently undertaking a funding competition to raise the required private finance for the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft procurement. The consortium aims to complete this process as soon as possible.

Iraq: Peacekeeping Operations

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the average tour intervals are for each unit deploying to Iraq in the autumn. [154252]

Des Browne: Details of the most recent tour intervals for the formed Army units due to deploy to Iraq in November and December are as follows:

Unit Tour Interval (months)

The Royal Dragoon Guards

31

Ist Bn Scots Guards

31

The Royal Scots Borderers, 1st Bn The Royal Regiment of Scotland(l)

1 Royal Scots: 18 1 King's Own Scottish Borderers: 16

1st Bn The Duke of Lancaster's Regiment (King's, Lancashire and Border)(2)

n/a

1st Bn The Cheshire Regiment

37

21 Engineer Regiment

31

(1) Royal Scots and 1 King's Own Scottish Borderers amalgamated to form The Royal Scots Borderers in August 06. (2) King's Own Royal Border Regiment, 1 King's Regiment and the 1 Queen's Lancashire Regiment amalgamated in July 2006 to form 1 Lancashire Regiment and 2 Lancashire Regiment. Op TELIC 11 will be the first unit operational deployment for 1 Lancashire Regiment.

The formation of 1 Lancashire Regiment and 2 Lancashire Regiment involved the amalgamation of 1 King's Own Royal Border Regiment, 1 King's Regiment and the Queen's Lancashire Regiment, with both of the new regiments containing personnel from each of the three original regiments. It is not possible therefore to calculate meaningful historic average tour intervals for 1 Lancashire Regiment but, for information, 1 King's Own Royal Border Regiment returned from its previous deployment in April 2006 (equivalent to an 18 months interval) and 1 King's Regiment and the Queen's Lancashire Regiment returned from their previous deployments in October 2003 (equivalent to a 50 month tour interval).

Royal Air Force ground units operate differently to those of the Army. While a unit might be deployed for four months, RAF personnel can rotate through the unit rather than remain deployed with it throughout. Therefore unit and personnel tour intervals are not necessarily the same.

Unit Tour Interval (based upon last operational tour and current deployment)

2 Force Protection Wing Headquarters

12 months

34 Sqn Force Protection

12 months


Mr. Blunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the total annual cost was to the (a) defence budget and (b) reserve of payments made to servicemen arising from service in (i) Iraq and (ii) Afghanistan in the latest period for which figures are available. [157086]


16 Oct 2007 : Column 941W

Des Browne [holding answer 15 October 2007]: The net additional cost for service personnel for service in Iraq and Afghanistan in the last period for which figures are available is as follows:

Operating cost 2006-07
£000
Service manpower Total outturn

Iraq

99,779

Afghanistan

49,487


These net additional costs are met from the HM Treasury Reserve and not from the Defence budget.

Military Aircraft

Dr. Fox: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence how many aircraft are in service in the RAF, broken down by type. [157047]

Mr. Bob Ainsworth: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 9 October 2007, Official Report, column 509W.

Military Aircraft: Manpower

Ann Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what percentage of those who set out to be pilots of (a) Eurofighter, (b) GR7 Harrier, (c) Merlin, (d) Lynx, (e) Sea King, (f) Chinook and (g) Apache were successful in each of the last three years. [157076]

Derek Twigg: After extensive early flying training, the RAF personnel are streamed, according to aptitude into one of three streams: Fast-jet (FJ), Rotary-wing (RW) or Multi-engine (ME). All of the Army personnel go to RW, most of the Navy personnel follow this same route, although some go on to FJ training. All of this ab initio training is conducted within the Air Force system.

Following successful completion of ab initio training pilots enter an Operational Conversion Unit (OCU) where they learn to operate the specific aircraft type for which they have been selected. The following table shows pass rates for pilots entering the OCU:


16 Oct 2007 : Column 942W
S uccessful (percentage)

2004-05

Typhoon

100

GR7 Harrier

92

Merlin

100

Lynx

100

Sea King

100

Chinook

94

Apache

95

2005-06

Typhoon

100

GR7 Harrier

100

Merlin

100

Lynx

100

Sea King

100

Chinook

100

Apache

98

2006-07

Typhoon

97

GR7 Harrier

100

Merlin

100

Lynx

98

Sea King

100

Chinook

94

Apache

89

Notes:
1. All totals have been rounded to the nearest whole percent.
2. Factors affecting success include: Failure to achieve course standards, medical downgrading and premature voluntary retirement. Unsuccessful candidates may be given employment elsewhere within the Service.

Next Section Index Home Page