Mental Health Bill [Lords]


[back to previous text]

Clause 11

Amendments to Part 2 of 1983 Act
Amendment proposed: No. 60, in clause 11, page 7, line 10, at end insert—
‘(11) After that subsection, insert—
“( ) No person can act as a responsible clinician unless he is capable of providing objective medical expertise of mental disorder.
( ) Objective medical expertise of mental disorder shall have the same meaning as in Winterwerp v The Netherlands (1979-80) 2 EHRR 387.”’.—[Tim Loughton.]
The Committee divided: Ayes 7, Noes 11.
Division No. 7 ]
AYES
Browning, Angela
Duddridge, James
Gidley, Sandra
Loughton, Tim
Rosindell, Andrew
Walker, Mr. Charles
Williams, Hywel
NOES
Coffey, Ann
Gibson, Dr. Ian
Gwynne, Andrew
Hillier, Meg
Iddon, Dr. Brian
Kidney, Mr. David
McCarthy, Kerry
Moon, Mrs. Madeleine
Naysmith, Dr. Doug
Ward, Claire
Winterton, rh Ms Rosie
Question accordingly negatived.
Question proposed, That the clause stand part of the Bill.
Ms Winterton: The hon. Gentleman’s explanation is a nice try, but it rather exposes the real view—a non-belief in the role of the responsible clinician, given that the effect of his later amendment would be to destroy clause 11 completely and take it out of the Bill.
Question put and agreed to.
Clause 11 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Clauses 12 and 13 ordered to stand part of the Bill.
Further consideration adjourned.—[Cla i re Ward.]
Adjourned accordingly at four minutes pastSeven o’clock till Tuesday 8 May at half-past Ten o’clock.
 
Previous Contents
House of Commons 
home page Parliament home page House of 
Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index

©Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 2 May 2007