Select Committee on Administration Written Evidence


Further submission: response to evidence submitted to the ICT inquiry (January 2007)

A.  SUMMARY

  1.  There were several core themes arising from the evidence to the Administration Committee's inquiry into Members ICT. The evidence to the inquiry recognises that a high level of ICT service and support is required to support the efficient working practice of Members, and that their Parliamentary work is conducted in a mobile and time critical manner which increasingly relies on the effective working of ICT outside, as well as inside, the Parliamentary estate.

  2.  Until now, ICT has been funded to provide a high concentration of service on the Parliamentary estate. Members are supplied with PCs, printers and Microsoft email and Office services which connect to the parliamentary network. PICT employs IT engineers to maintain and mend equipment and provide services on the Parliamentary estate and trainers directly support Members at Westminster.

  3.  Since 2001, a range of network connection services to the Parliamentary network have also been provided to Members in their constituency offices and from their homes, and since 2006 from a mobile device. The current level of funding for country-wide ICT provision is however limited and does not cover support for privately procured equipment, nor does it cover wider constituency office network or software services. The maintenance and support for ICT services outside of Westminster has been largely provided remotely through the telephone Service Desk (extension 2001) and through 3rd party sub contractors. Some of these 3rd party services (for instance BT and Demon) required direct involvement by Members or their staff to invoke the service and to register faults.

  4.  There is evidence that the ICT support provided at Westminster has improved over recent years, but it is also clear from the evidence to the inquiry that this does not adequately support Members in their wider role outside of Westminster and the level of support to constituency offices is confusing and inadequate for the high level of dependency that Members have on these services.

  5.  Four key themes arising from the Inquiry have been addressed by PICT in their response to the Administration Committee on 30 January 2007. These are:

    —  the requirement to continue to improve the quality of ICT service currently provided to Members;

    —  the discussion on the reconciliation of the advice of several experts to provide a more standard fixed desktop software environment versus the requirement to provide a flexible desktop services that is tailored to individual Member's requirements;

    —  the requirement to increase the level of ICT support to constituency offices; and

    —  the development of new ICT services to support Members' work.

  6.  PICT has read the evidence to the Inquiry and analysed in further detail the four core themes described in the sections below. This analysis describes the situation of funded service today, the actions that PICT has taken to improve services during 2006 and the actions planned to improve service further during 2007. The analysis under each theme also describes options for consideration for further improvements.

B.  THEME 1: CONTINUE TO IMPROVE SERVICES CURRENTLY PROVIDED BY PICT

  7.  Since June 2006, PICT has been working on improvements at the Service Desk. Against the background of a year on year increase in the total number of calls to the Service Desk, a greater proportion of those calls are answered and the number of calls now lost are the same or less than comparable national benchmark figures.


  8.  The time to respond to telephone calls has also improved to meet national benchmark standards, with most calls now being answered in less than 30 seconds.


  9.  PICT plans for future improvements to Members' services include:

    —  Provide Members with a one-stop-shop for all IT services, with a single point of contact to provide a co-ordinated service and which will provide management for 3rd party contract services as well as PICT directly provided services

    —  Extension of service desk and network support hours to provide 24 hrs x 7 days a week cover.

    —  Continue the improvement in service desk response, with ongoing training and improved and joined up customer record keeping.

C.  THEME 2: RANGE OF EQUIPMENT AND STANDARDISED DESKTOP PROVIDED TO MEMBERS

  10.  The current services and range of equipment that PICT is authorised to provide to Members are outlined in Annex 1. This list reflects resolutions of the House on Members' allowances and decisions of the House of Commons Commission or Members Estimate Committee.The Annex also identifies the services which PICT is not authorised or funded to provide.

  11.  The additional services which PICT plans to provide in 2007 are outlined in Annex 2. These services include additional hardware items in the catalogue, as well as additional network services and security backup services. In particular, PICT plans to develop additional wireless network services around the Palace of Westminster.

  12.  Current IT training is delivered through a 3rd party training organisation that provides Members and their staff with IT training courses, but from 2007 PICT's training service will be increased to provide improved remote desktop software support (system shadowing) from Westminster and e-training services will be available remotely to a desktop, using a virtual classroom. The 3rd party training contracts will be reviewed after evaluation of these developments.

  13.  The question of a standard desktop has been raised during the Inquiry, and PICT seeks Members' advice on this issue. Members are individual customers rather than a single customer group, and are sometimes compared to individual small businesses. However, the service provided by Parliament must be consistent and impartially available for all Members and so does require some level of standardisation. The current position is that PICT is authorised to provide a standard set of hardware and software, but apart from that there is little standardisation of the desktop environment. The advantage of this situation is that it provides Members with high degrees of flexibility, but the disadvantage is that flexibility makes the desktop more difficult to support, more difficult to introduce general improvements, and it is more difficult to diagnose problems if there is a fault.

  14.  Some options which PICT is considering:

    —  PICT intends to identify and work more closely with the top five software suppliers to Members to encourage joint working and support. This approach is intended to cover all the main suppliers of casework management software.

    —  Our development plan includes deploying more web based services, which will allow flexible access and help to accommodate a more standardised desktop with the support advantages that have already been described.

    —  For those Members seeking to work independently from the Parliamentary Network we have piloted the provision of direct ADSL to their Westminster office for those who wish to receive it at their own expense.

    —  We will be revisiting logging in processes and password management as well as the desire for private and generic emails accounts. This will include measures to safeguard the privacy of Members' communications when staff transfer employment from one Member to another.

  15.  During 2007, PICT will investigate the feasibility of increasing Members' file storage space, along with archiving procedures.

D.  THEME 3: IMPROVE CONSTITUENCY SUPPORT WITH NEW SERVICES (WITH THE IMPLICATION OF ADDITIONAL COST FOR THESE SERVICES)

  16.  Services provided to Members at Westminster are reported for the most part as being effective for provision and support of equipment and software that PICT is funded to provide. PICT acknowledges that support for constituencies is less effective than the services provided at Westminster. The increased reliance on electronic communications and systems to support the core work of Members, and the increased workloads in constituencies have resulted in a substantial increase in the number of requests for constituency support and for increased levels of service to match Westminster levels of service. This must be considered alongside the levels of resources required to support the geographically diverse nature of customers. PICT is not currently funded to provide services in that geographic dimension. In our initial investigations we have assessed a number of options and their potential costs for Members to consider.

  17.  The options include:

    —  24x7 hours support services for service desk, servers, network (see theme 1 above).

    —  Account management to provide a single point of contact for services to constituency offices. This would involve PICT managing the interface with 3rd party contracted services to provide a cohesive managed service for procurement, installation and maintenance of equipment.

    —  Further web-based services—such as virtual "drop-in surgeries" and extended remote command of the PC software.

    —  A managed LAN (local area network) in constituency offices and a higher specification of network connection to Westminster.

    —  Regional support units (probably 3rd party contracts).

  18.  The cost of the 24x7 service, account management and virtual "drop-in surgeries" for constituency support are included in current plans and will be introduced at no additional revenue cost.

  19.  Indicative costs for offering LAN support and network based improvements (which will require clearer specification and market testing) have been estimated to be in the region of £6.1 million to implement and £6.3 million to run per annum thereafter. If instead of the options above, new dedicated lines to connect constituency offices to the Parliamentary network are introduced, there is an estimated indicative cost of £7.4 million implementation and £9.9 million per annum running costs. This assumes full take up and is based on the highest specification of equipment and 3rd party support available. They should therefore be seen as an upper limit for this type of improvement. In the event that PICT is authorised to take these options further a full business case would be drawn up and costings put to the Members Estimate Committee/House of Commons Commission.

  20.  Indicative costs for Regional support units would be subject to market investigation and are likely to be provided through 3rd party contracts.

  21.  One fundamental constraint for providing increased ICT services from Parliament to constituency offices will be clarity of service level arrangements at Dissolution. Members' are reminded that all of PICT's services are funded for Parliamentary use only. The overlap between parliamentary, political and private use of ICT is an issue that already exists and as ICT systems generally become more integrated, is likely to intensify as an issue for the future.

E.  THEME 4: DEVELOPING THE RIGHT LEVEL OF ENGAGEMENT TO PROVIDE A MEMBER STEER ON FUTURE IT SERVICES

  22.  ICT is a fast moving subject and new services and products are constantly being introduced. In this environment, PICT seeks guidance on how to develop the relationship with Members and the Administration Committee in order to identify the new products that will best support Members in their work. This range of services could include:

    —  The provision of webcam services for video links from Westminster to constituency offices to provide Internet video links.

    —  Web services (Members' portal, website framework, blogs, forum, communicating with the public).

    —  Range of channels for delivering electronic documents (Personal Digital Assistant , text alerts, voice alerts, group communications).

    —  Mobility of services—eg login from anywhere.

    —  "Electronic Committee" options.

  23.  As requested, PICT will add additional items to the catalogue which Members can choose to purchase if they wish. If widespread demand is seen for a particular item or revision to list of items available on loan, then this will be brought to the attention of the MEC, via the Administration Committee and APMA. If appropriate it will be submitted to SSRB as part of their deliberations via formal evidence.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 8 May 2007