Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 220-234)

MR COLIN DAWSON, MR PHILIP MILLER MBE, MR MICHAEL BEDINGFIELD AND MR STUART BARROW

11 JULY 2006

  Q220  Mr Betts: Do you do surveys afterwards to find how successful that has been?

  Mr Bedingfield: Absolutely, yes.

  Q221  Mr Betts: It is possible to have any information about those as well?

  Mr Bedingfield: Yes, we can do that.

  Q222  Mr Betts: Let me turn to BALPPA. You suggest in your evidence that a specific scheme to help coastal regions would be helpful. Given that we have just been talking about the diversity of all the different coastal resorts and towns and cities, would a scheme really be helpful or are you talking about a variety of schemes that could be pulled together or targeted at appropriate locations?

  Mr Dawson: Yes. I think schemes as a strategy are that what we are trying to identify here. There is a need for the various agencies and the RDAs to be pulled together to concentrate their efforts with a partnership between the public sector and the private sector that moves things forward because all too often, certainly from the private sector perspective, it is not always simple to identify where you should go in order to make things happen. We have had a classic example in Southend where all the money that has been spent down there so far has been from the private sector but there are more opportunities down there, as there are in numerous other places around the coast, where more could be done to invigorate and rejuvenate tourism.

  Q223  Mr Betts: Who is going to be pulling it all together? Is it a central Government responsibility or do you think some of the RDAs should be involved?

  Mr Dawson: I think there has to be guidance from the Government on a national strategy that pulls the thing together. All too often now they are dispersed and they are operating individually.

  Q224  Mr Betts: I am not quite certain I am getting the flavour of this. We have talked about a national strategy but then we are talking about the fact that every town, every city on the coast is very different.

  Mr Dawson: Yes, but that is why it would have to go down through the regional bodies. What I am saying is that there is insufficient guidance to the regions for them to concentrate their efforts. They need that guidance. There needs to be a policy from national government which says, "This is the strategy and you will follow it", and that comes down through the regions so that the region then takes that on board and works with the partnerships in the area, private and public sector, to make things happen.

  Q225  Chair: Is that your view, Mr Miller?

  Mr Miller: I can give you a few examples in Southend. We have got various grants from various bodies. We have had Thames Gateway give us some money for a big scheme. Objective 2 have given money for the high street. We have had a small amount of lottery money for the cliffs. If we could talk about the cliffs, at the moment they are in danger of bowling into the sea. They are a big threat to the local economy, let alone the people. We have had one collapse and we have had a £35 million estimate come along that the council have not got any money for but in the meantime they are spending £6 million or £7 million on one scheme not too far away, another £10 million or £15 million somewhere else of this grant money, and the people of Southend are saying, "Why are you doing that when this is the most desperate, horrific business here?", because it is a danger to people's homes. That is a classic example. Instead of having all this money where the council is given the opportunity to bid for the money and they have to meet these criteria in a short space of time, where they really want it they would like to divert it there.

  Q226  Chair: Are you saying there is a lack of an overall strategy?

  Mr Miller: Totally, yes.

  Q227  John Cummings: I am rather surprised that none of the witnesses has made any reference to the present debacle with the provision of casinos. Do you see the provision of casinos being very high? Will it help the regeneration of seaside towns? How do you view the way in which the legislation is being shoved through the washing machine at the present time?

  Mr Dawson: I think the regional casino does offer opportunities for regeneration of coastal towns but, going down the scale to the small and large casino, I do not think it offers anything. In fact there is a great problem of transference of business from the coastal arcades that have been the tradition in this country for so many years to the smaller and larger casinos. With the regional casino, of which one is currently planned, we know not where, that is a totally different operation because that has very significant leisure and hotel support, and that is definitely an opportunity to regenerate a town.

  Q228  John Cummings: Do you feel the same way?

  Mr Bedingfield: I agree.

  Mr Miller: I do not; only in certain places. In Southend we all breathed a big sigh of relief when we did not get it, the people that live there. The council has one view but the residents—and there are a lot of businesses—have a completely different one. It just would not have worked in Southend. We have not got the car parking, we have not got the infrastructure. If you look at the Blackpool model it is absolutely perfect for them. Let them have it, please do.

  Q229  Mr Betts: Sheffield wants it too.

  Mr Miller: Have two. I am not against casinos per se. I do not mind them at all. I even got married in one.

  Mr Dawson: So if we gave the impression it was within our gift it certainly is not.

  Mr Miller: It is no good living in a nice town if you cannot get around it. Southend is in good luck already. If you suddenly have these hundreds of thousands of people coming to these casinos where are you going to put them? Where are you going to park them? We just have not got it.

  Q230  Sir Paul Beresford: Let me take you back a little bit to the question before the last one. The problem with national guidance is that it must be national and it has to apply across the board but in your particular cases the most striking thing is the variety of the towns. Do you want guidance or do you actually want more freedom?

  Mr Dawson: No, I think it is guidance, because without the guidance what is happening at the moment is—

  Q231  Sir Paul Beresford: What is the guidance going to say?

  Mr Dawson: I will give you an example. We have just had the tourism policy guidance. That is a classic example which is pointing out to local authorities that when you consider planning applications for tourism destinations this is what you should be considering. It is that sort of guidance that is bringing a focus into tourism which previously did not exist. That is what I am talking about. Mr Betts made a classic example just now when he said that the brief of RDAs is extremely wide and as a consequence of that tourism gets pushed to the end, if it is there at all. In many cases there is no tourism represented in the RDAs at all. That is the sort of policy guidance that I would like to see.

  Q232  Mr Betts: If I can turn to VisitBritain, how well do you think Government departments work with you and listen to you about making sure that regeneration developments are linked into tourism and the needs of that industry?

  Mr Barrow: There has certainly been much interest in an initiative such as Liverpool winning Capital of Culture 2008 or the Olympics or many events that will help us promote Britain internationally as a tourist destination. Local government is quite responsive to the need to attract tourists to the local economy. We are very worried that the Lyons review might suggest a bed tax on tourism which we think would be detrimental to the tourist trade, but in general we feel that the Government is supportive of the tourist industry. It is one of our biggest industries after all, £74 billion a year.

  Q233  Chair: Can I ask you about the bed tax routine? Might it not make some local authorities rather more enthusiastic about promoting tourism if they thought it was going to bring in income, because one of the points that has been made to us by local authorities is that from the point of view of a council tourism may increase their costs enormously without giving them as a council any additional income whatsoever.

  Mr Barrow: If those local authorities that have publicly said they are against the idea, such as Bournemouth, do not impose a bed tax but other local authorities do, then Bournemouth, which is already a popular tourist destination, is going to become relatively more attractive than those that want to promote more tourism to their area. It is a bizarre way to try and attract visitors by making them pay more.

  Q234  Chair: Unless it might be seen as a way of mobilising funds to maintain the public fabric which we are told is what attracts people to seaside resorts.

  Mr Barrow: Which is exactly what they thought would happen in the Balearic Islands when they imposed an eco tax on tourists, and they have had to abandon it because they saw a big drop in tourism to the Balearic Islands.

  Chair: Thank you very much indeed. If, when you disappear, you think of something you should have said, drop us a note.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 March 2007