Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380-383)

MR BILL WELLS AND MR JEREMY GROOMBRIDGE

17 OCTOBER 2006

  Q380  Lyn Brown: I understand the need for national statistics and I think the Labour Force Survey is a good one, so I am not trying to undermine the evidence that you have given us, but what I am trying to understand is whether or not you feel that you have been able to give us the answers as correctly as possible, given that it is only the Labour Force Survey upon which you have been able to rely, and that there is nothing you have been able to give us that enables us to dig deeper underneath the statistics that you have provided us with from the Labour Force Survey.

  Mr Wells: I think the answer to that is yes, because although we have used the Labour Force Survey for a particular set of descriptions on this we have also used the surveys of employers for the tourism jobs and the benefits information for benefits, and the information on the national insurance. It makes it a little fuzzy at the edges but I think that the overall picture is consistent, using all of those sources.

  Q381  Anne Main: On the point of migrant workers, from which we have moved from, I would like to know what your definition of a migrant worker is, particularly to make sure we are all talking about the same thing, and it says that you believe 400 jobs have disappeared from their books because directors are now directly hiring migrant workers. What evidence do you have of that?

  Mr Wells: Again, these were in different sources. In terms of national insurance numbers the definition of people from abroad, and the information that I gave you in terms of some of the areas had more people born abroad, who asked for a national insurance number, is one source. In terms of the local evidence, again JobCentre Plus—and I will let Jeremy speak—is literally that they deal with employers and the employers are getting in touch with other agencies and setting up different recruitment terms.

  Q382  Anne Main: Are you saying then that the employers who work with JobCentre Plus are removing themselves off their books because you believe they are going elsewhere for their workers; is that what you are saying?

  Mr Wells: We would rather that they stayed with JobCentre Plus so that more of the clients of JobCentre Plus would use them and reduce the numbers on benefits, but there are examples which JobCentre Plus has of employers who used to recruit through JobCentre Plus but who now recruit elsewhere.

  Anne Main: That is what I said, but I just wondered where you got your figures from of 400 jobs disappearing.

  Chair: Southport JobCentre Plus, who have said that.

  Anne Main: That is what I am saying. I just wondered if there is anything to support this, if it is nationally rolled out?

  Q383  Chair: I think you have to take it that it is Southport who said those figures and presumably you might have anecdotes from elsewhere?

  Mr Groombridge: I am not familiar with the specific figures around Southport, but certainly in the world in which we operate there are obviously other agencies that can help move people into jobs, and indeed we have a shared objective in that sense. But there are certainly instances where employers will use the services of other agencies in preference to JobCentre Plus, and that is the world we work in.

  Chair: Thank you very much indeed. We now move on to the Environment Agency.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 March 2007