Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 500-503)

RT HON RICHARD CABORN

24 OCTOBER 2006

  Q500  Dr Pugh: May I ask you to reflect on the partnership you may or may not have with other departments in Government? Clearly there is a need in terms of promoting tourism to look at other things as well and help the promotion of tourism. For example, you need housing so young people can stay in seaside resorts and the like and find affordable accommodation. Equally, one of your predecessors, Kim Howells, went round many of the seaside resorts and he said that wherever he went people made points about transport links and the inadequacy of them. Clearly if we are to have successful coastal tourism we have to have a number of things going right as well both in terms of housing and in terms of transport. Is there a sufficient partnership between the various departments of Government to ensure that things do go right or is there still something of a silo mentality here?

  Mr Caborn: To be absolutely honest, I do think there was a silo mentality. If you look at where tourism has been, it has slopped around many government departments in England. It has never been the case in Wales and it has never been the case in Scotland or indeed in Northern Ireland but it has in England, which is why three or four years ago we took the decision to put that into a multi-agency. Rather than it slopping around somewhere we decided to put it inside the regional development agencies, a multi-agency organisation, which has the sole objective of driving up the wealth creation of their region. That is why we put tourism there, because we saw it as a major economic driver. Before then it had gone round DTI, to the Home Office to DCMS, it had slopped around Whitehall bouncing from pillar to post. I do know that because when I used to chair the Trade and Industry Committee we argued then that we ought to find a home inside the economic sector. We have done that in DCMS by putting it inside the RDAs which are an economic driver. That is the reality.

  Q501  Dr Pugh: I can understand that it is entirely desirable to have a regional overview and to integrate these things at a regional level, but also necessarily a number of government departments are involved in the process and therefore there is a need for there to be an overview at a central government level. What I am wondering is what your Department does in terms of meeting other departments like DCLG and so on to facilitate that, to make that happen, to have a general focus not just on tourism but what actually makes tourism happen.

  Mr Caborn: We worked with the Department for Transport, DCLG on the good practice planning guidance for tourism, which was published by DCLG this year and there are several areas where we work together as departments on the whole question of tourism. I do come back, if you are asking about the day-to-day activity, to the fact that is now taking place inside the regional development agencies, which is a multi-agency for Government anyway with a very specific objective. That is where I believe the focus has to be to drive up both the quantity and quality of tourism.

  Q502  Dr Pugh: Would you feel it appropriate for example if your Department had input into housing strategy at a national level simply because housing is a big problem which has been brought up in all our inquiries into all the coastal towns we looked at? I am not saying you are responsible for solving it, but you have a view on what effect it will have on the tourist economy.

  Mr Caborn: Yes, in the normal course of Government we would have a view. If it is something on open spaces or in other areas of sustainable communities, in these areas yes, we would have an input. We would have an input in terms of the arts, culture and so on. We would make our contribution to that debate. That is one thing about developing the policy and it is then about delivering it. The delivery mechanism, as far as tourism is concerned and therefore this area you are talking about, is actually through the regional development agencies.

  Q503  Dr Pugh: Just to touch briefly on the issue of transport and transport links, do you make representations to the Department for Transport about what transport links would beneficially help inbound tourism?

  Mr Caborn: Absolutely. As I said, the good practice tourism guide which went out was a case in point where the Department for Transport was one of those, along with other departments, which came together to look at that at a strategic level.

  Chair: Thank you very much indeed Minister.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 7 March 2007