Supplementary memorandum by the Department
for Communities and Local Government (RG 32(d))
Question 1: At Q632, Yvette Cooper referred
to a chart of growth figures, which she indicated she would ensure
was passed to the Committee.
1. I attach at Appendix 1 the chart of growth
figures referred to by Yvette Cooper at Q632.
2. Since then (on 15 December) new regional
GVA data has been released by ONS. I therefore also attach—at
Appendix 1A—a chart of growth figures reflecting this latest
information. The latter includes the first release of provisional
regional GVA data for 2005 as well as revisions to previous years'
data. In particular, it reflects upward revisions to the 2004
UK growth made by the ONS in summer 2006 to incorporate survey
data which was not previously available.
Question 2: At Q633, Yvette Cooper stated that
she would send to the Committee figures for overall spending on
services per region. Please could the Department's memorandum
also include the following related information:
(a) an explanation of how the figures are
calculated; and
(b) a breakdown of the overall spending by
Government department.
3. The figures for overall spending on services
by region referred to at Q633 were taken from the Public Expenditure
Statistical Analyses (PESA) 2006 published by HM Treasury (HMT)
on 16 May. Chapter 7 of that document provides breakdowns by function,
country and region, together with 26 tables (http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/377/3B/cm6811_08_Chap_7.pdf)
4. Please note in particular Table 7.2,
which lists the total identifiable expenditure on services per
head in the regions cited in the response to Q633, and Table 7.11—which
breaks down per capita expenditure by function. The analyses shows
outturns in the regional locations of the individuals, enterprises
and communities for whose benefit expenditure was incurred—but
the extent to which these regional outturns were specifically
planned as such will of course vary from programme to programme.
5. Table 7.19 provides a breakdown of Departmental
group total expenditure by sub-function. Each Department is asked
annually to take the subset of its spending that can be identified
as benefiting the population of individual regions and apportion
it in line with guidance issued jointly by HMT and ONS.
Further detail of how the calculations are arrived
at can be found in PESA Chapter 7.
Question 3: It is noted (from papers provided
in relation to the Departmental Annual Report) that an update
on progress in relation to PSA2 is expected to be published before
the end of the year. In anticipation of this information, please
could the Department explain what indicators are being used to
assess progress, and over what time period progress is being assessed?
6. For the regional economic performance
PSA2 target the headline indicator is the trend rate of GVA per
head growth in the English regions—from 2003 to 2008 for
the first part of the target and from 2003 to 2012 for the second.
Performance in each region must improve—and growth rate
disparities between London, the South East and East together and
the other six regions together must narrow—compared to a
baseline period of 1990 to 2002 for the target to be met.
7. A full assessment of progress can only
be made over a full economic cycle. Final GVA data is currently
held only for 2003, with provisional figures available for 2004. The
interim report will therefore compare performance in the baseline
period with changes in GVA per head growth rates over these two
years. It will also include an assessment of progress since 2003
compared to the baseline period (so far back as data is available)
against key supporting indicators on employment and each of the
five drivers of productivity—skills, enterprise, innovation,
investment and competition. These indicators were originally set
out in a consultation document Productivity in the UK 5: Benchmarking
UK Productivity Performance published in March 2004 and are
maintained on a CLG/DTI/HMT website (http://www.dtistats.net/reppsa/).
Question 4: The Committee would be grateful to
receive a list of all the Government agencies and non-departmental
public bodies which operate in each of the Government Office Regions.
8. A list of Government agencies operating
in the UK is supplied (can be accessed at: http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/D/1/Directories/A-ZofCentralGovernment/index.htm),
while the list of public bodies (including Non Departmental Public
Bodies) is maintained by the Cabinet Office (http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/other/agencies/public_bodies/index.asp).
Details of which organisation has premises where are not held
centrally—some provide specialised services from a single
site, others maintain large operational networks such as Jobcentre
Plus.
9. However, we have calculated that as far
as the 83 Government agencies are concerned, Headquarters (which
in many cases may be the only location) are distributed as follows:
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 10.
10. For the 506 NDPBs the figures are:
Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 94.
The 506 figure excludes NHS bodies. The remaining
gap between it and the 883 in the Cabinet office Directory is
accounted for by multiple bodies such as the Advisory Committee
on Justices of the Peace.
11. You will be aware that civil service
and sponsored bodies' locations are kept under review as part
of the efficiency programme managed by the Office for Government
Commerce which aims to move 20,000 posts out of London by 2010.
Question 5: The Department has previously provided
the Committee with a spreadsheet setting out funding for the Core
Cities for 2005-06 by Departmental programme, through RSG and
selective spending by other Government Departments. The Committee
would be grateful to receive two further spreadsheets each (a)
providing figures for the same areas, and for London; and (b)
including, in addition to the data already provided, spending
allocations for:
(i) Metro transport spending;
(ii) Northern Way Growth Fund spending (as
appropriate);
(iii) Funding for the Thames Gateway and/or
other Growth Areas (as appropriate); and
(iv) Significant projected expenditure (for
example in relation to the 2012 Olympics)
The first of these spreadsheets should provide
data for the core cities (as already provided) and for London;
the second of these spreadsheets should provide data for the equivalent
"city-regions" as defined in the City Region Development
Plans or in other negotiations with Government, and for London
plus the growth areas in the south east and eastern regions.
12. As far as the further information you
have requested in paras 5(i) to (iv) is concerned, we understand
the Department of Transport are providing you with the information
on metro spending at sub-para (i) direct.
13. On sub-para (ii), the Northern Way,
attached at Appendix 2 is a spreadsheet relating to the Northern
Way Growth Fund (NWGF). The NWGF is a one-off, covering the three
financial years 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08. It was intended
to kick start the initiative, with then ODPM providing £50
million match funding alongside the RDAs' £50 million contribution.
14. The Northern Way has completed its first
year of operation and the spreadsheet shows target, actual spend
and under/over spend for 2005-06 as well as allocations for 2006-07
and 2007-08 and the three year total. The day-to-day management
of the Northern Way Growth Fund is, however, a matter for the
Northern Way itself, and if the Select Committee require a more
detailed breakdown we would advise they approach the Northern
Way direct for this information.
15. On (iii), in 2005-06 Thames Gateway
programme spending was £164.4 million, £62 million of
it in London. The Growth Areas Fund spent £73.1 million in
2005-06, of which:
— £12.6 million was allocated
to English Partnerships.
— £16.5 million (£1.8 million
revenue and £14.7 million capital) went to NDPBs and Urban
Development Corporations in the Newer Growth Areas.
— £44.4 million (£4.9 million
revenue and £39.5 million capital) was allocated to Local
Authorities in the Newer Growth Areas.
Further information can be found in the spreadsheet
attached as Appendix 3.
16. Finally, you ask about significant projected
expenditure, eg in relation to the 2012 Olympics. CLG's expenditure
in future years will of course depend on the outcome of discussions
taking place as part of the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review.
Further details of expenditure during the current (SR04) period
will be published in the next few weeks.
APPENDIX 1
GROSS VALUE ADDED (GVA) PER HEAD GROWTH RATES AT CURRENT BASIC PRICES BY REGION 1989 TO 2004 CALCULATED FROM ONS GVA PER HEAD DATA FIRST RELEASED IN DECEMBER 2005
| GVA per head growth rates |
1990-2001 |
1989-90 |
1990-91 |
1991-92 |
1992-93 |
1993-94 |
1994-95 |
1995-96 |
1996-97 |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
1999-2000 |
2000-01 |
| (REP PSA base period) |
base period trend growth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| North East |
4.38% |
8.15% |
4.88% |
4.55% |
4.14% |
4.84% |
4.39% |
4.31% |
4.51% |
4.32% |
3.37% |
3.83% |
5.07% |
| North West |
4.67% |
8.36% |
3.64% |
4.23% |
4.74% |
5.40% |
4.53% |
5.08% |
5.26% |
5.36% |
4.34% |
3.65% |
5.22% |
| Yorkshire & Humber |
4.64% |
8.09% |
4.18% |
3.56% |
4.17% |
4.99% |
5.52% |
6.06% |
5.69% |
5.13% |
3.27% |
3.67% |
4.90% |
| East Midlands |
4.51% |
7.57% |
3.73% |
3.62% |
4.36% |
5.40% |
5.07% |
5.77% |
5.56% |
4.41% |
3.17% |
3.51% |
5.06% |
| West Midlands |
4.82% |
8.31% |
3.38% |
3.98% |
5.22% |
6.17% |
5.20% |
5.43% |
6.08% |
5.38% |
3.68% |
3.99% |
4.53% |
| East of England |
4.88% |
8.46% |
3.69% |
3.57% |
4.67% |
5.09% |
4.60% |
5.44% |
5.59% |
6.30% |
4.51% |
4.93% |
5.30% |
| London |
5.04% |
8.46% |
4.15% |
4.66% |
5.70% |
4.71% |
2.86% |
5.91% |
7.02% |
8.85% |
4.68% |
3.21% |
3.87% |
| South East |
5.60% |
8.51% |
4.65% |
4.08% |
5.36% |
5.59% |
5.40% |
6.86% |
7.18% |
7.86% |
4.91% |
4.84% |
4.93% |
| South West |
4.99% |
8.31% |
4.26% |
3.55% |
4.95% |
5.16% |
4.89% |
7.05% |
5.87% |
5.79% |
4.23% |
4.03% |
5.12% |
| England |
4.98% |
8.33% |
4.07% |
4.02% |
4.97% |
5.29% |
4.64% |
5.95% |
6.17% |
6.51% |
4.30% |
4.06% |
4.85% |
|
|
| NMW |
4.79% |
8.17% |
3.91% |
3.89% |
4.66% |
5.39% |
4.96% |
5.69% |
5.59% |
5.18% |
3.77% |
3.79% |
4.99% |
| GSE |
5.32% |
8.49% |
4.22% |
4.16% |
5.32% |
5.12% |
4.22% |
6.16% |
6.73% |
7.87% |
4.75% |
4.25% |
4.63% |
| GVA per head growth rates |
2003-12 TARGET |
2001-02 |
2002-03 |
2003-04 |
2004-05 |
2005-06 |
2006-07 |
2007-08 |
2008-09 |
2009-10 |
2010-11 |
2011-12 |
| (REP PSA target period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| North East |
|
5.06% |
5.51% |
4.90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| North West |
|
4.67% |
5.03% |
4.70% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yorkshire & Humber |
|
5.50% |
5.73% |
4.51% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| East Midlands |
|
4.69% |
5.25% |
4.67% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| West Midlands |
|
4.36% |
4.88% |
4.79% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| East of England |
|
4.84% |
4.93% |
4.05% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| London |
|
6.62% |
5.60% |
2.88% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| South East |
|
4.70% |
4.77% |
3.82% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| South West |
|
5.07% |
4.94% |
3.94% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| England |
|
5.17% |
5.16% |
4.04% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| NMW |
|
4.87% |
5.18% |
4.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GSE |
|
5.49% |
5.11% |
3.51% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDIX 1A
| |
Year |
on |
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal GVA per
Head Growth |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Base
1990-2002 |
Target
to date
2002-05 |
| North East |
4.8% |
4.6% |
4.1% |
4.8% |
5.0% |
4.3% |
4.3% |
4.4% |
3.3% |
3.5% |
5.0% |
4.7% |
5.5% |
5.9% |
3.9% |
4.4% |
5.1% |
| North West |
3.6% |
4.3% |
4.7% |
5.4% |
5.0% |
5.0% |
5.1% |
5.4% |
4.3% |
3.5% |
4.9% |
4.5% |
5.1% |
5.4% |
3.4% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
| Yorkshire & Humber |
4.1% |
3.6% |
4.2% |
5.0% |
5.9% |
6.0% |
5.6% |
5.2% |
3.3% |
3.5% |
4.8% |
5.1% |
5.6% |
5.1% |
3.2% |
4.7% |
4.6% |
| East Midlands |
3.6% |
3.6% |
4.4% |
5.4% |
5.7% |
5.7% |
5.5% |
4.7% |
3.1% |
3.3% |
5.2% |
5.0% |
6.4% |
6.0% |
3.7% |
4.6% |
5.3% |
| West Midlands |
3.3% |
4.0% |
5.2% |
6.2% |
5.7% |
5.4% |
6.0% |
5.4% |
3.7% |
3.7% |
4.4% |
4.0% |
4.9% |
5.2% |
3.2% |
4.7% |
4.4% |
| East of England |
3.8% |
3.5% |
4.7% |
5.1% |
4.8% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
6.4% |
4.6% |
4.6% |
5.4% |
4.6% |
5.0% |
5.0% |
2.8% |
4.9% |
4.3% |
| London |
4.2% |
4.7% |
5.7% |
4.7% |
2.6% |
6.2% |
6.9% |
8.2% |
5.1% |
3.2% |
3.9% |
7.3% |
6.9% |
6.4% |
3.2% |
5.2% |
5.5% |
| South East |
4.7% |
4.0% |
5.4% |
5.6% |
5.4% |
6.9% |
7.0% |
7.9% |
5.1% |
4.5% |
5.2% |
4.8% |
5.1% |
5.1% |
2.8% |
5.5% |
4.3% |
| South West |
4.3% |
3.5% |
4.9% |
5.2% |
5.1% |
7.0% |
5.8% |
5.9% |
4.3% |
3.9% |
5.4% |
5.5% |
6.0% |
5.7% |
3.4% |
5.1% |
5.0% |
| England |
4.1% |
4.0% |
5.0% |
5.3% |
4.9% |
6.0% |
6.0% |
6.4% |
4.4% |
3.8% |
4.9% |
5.3% |
5.7% |
5.5% |
3.2% |
5.0% |
4.8% |
| Greater South East |
4.3% |
4.1% |
5.3% |
5.1% |
4.2% |
6.3% |
6.6% |
7.7% |
5.0% |
4.0% |
4.8% |
5.7% |
5.8% |
5.6% |
3.0% |
5.2% |
4.8% |
| North Midlands West |
3.9% |
3.9% |
4.7% |
5.4% |
5.4% |
5.7% |
5.5% |
5.3% |
3.8% |
3.6% |
4.9% |
4.8% |
5.5% |
5.5% |
3.4% |
4.7% |
4.8% |
| |
Year |
on |
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real GVA per Head
Growth (Est) |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Base
1990-2002 |
Target
to date
2002-05 |
| North East |
-0.7% |
0.8% |
1.3% |
3.2% |
2.3% |
0.6% |
1.7% |
1.9% |
1.6% |
2.2% |
2.2% |
1.1% |
2.3% |
3.2% |
1.8% |
1.5% |
2.4% |
| North West |
-1.8% |
0.4% |
1.9% |
3.8% |
2.2% |
1.3% |
2.4% |
2.9% |
2.6% |
2.3% |
2.1% |
0.9% |
1.8% |
2.7% |
1.3% |
1.7% |
1.9% |
| Yorkshire & Humber |
-1.3% |
-0.2% |
1.4% |
3.4% |
3.2% |
2.3% |
2.9% |
2.7% |
1.6% |
2.3% |
2.0% |
1.5% |
2.3% |
2.4% |
1.2% |
1.8% |
2.0% |
| East Midlands |
-1.8% |
-0.2% |
1.5% |
3.8% |
2.9% |
2.0% |
2.8% |
2.2% |
1.4% |
2.0% |
2.4% |
1.5% |
3.1% |
3.3% |
1.6% |
1.7% |
2.7% |
| West Midlands |
-2.1% |
0.2% |
2.4% |
4.6% |
3.0% |
1.6% |
3.3% |
2.9% |
2.0% |
2.4% |
1.6% |
0.5% |
1.6% |
2.5% |
1.1% |
1.8% |
1.8% |
| East of England |
-1.6% |
-0.3% |
1.8% |
3.5% |
2.1% |
1.7% |
2.8% |
3.9% |
2.9% |
3.3% |
2.6% |
1.0% |
1.8% |
2.4% |
0.7% |
2.0% |
1.6% |
| London |
-1.3% |
0.8% |
2.8% |
3.1% |
0.0% |
2.4% |
4.1% |
5.6% |
3.4% |
1.9% |
1.1% |
3.7% |
3.6% |
3.7% |
1.1% |
2.3% |
2.8% |
| South East |
-0.8% |
0.2% |
2.5% |
4.0% |
2.7% |
3.0% |
4.3% |
5.3% |
3.3% |
3.2% |
2.4% |
1.2% |
1.9% |
2.5% |
0.7% |
2.6% |
1.7% |
| South West |
-1.1% |
-0.3% |
2.1% |
3.6% |
2.4% |
3.2% |
3.1% |
3.4% |
2.6% |
2.6% |
2.6% |
1.9% |
2.7% |
3.0% |
1.3% |
2.1% |
2.3% |
|
|
| England |
-1.4% |
0.2% |
2.1% |
3.7% |
2.1% |
2.2% |
3.3% |
3.9% |
2.7% |
2.6% |
2.1% |
1.7% |
2.4% |
2.9% |
1.1% |
2.1% |
2.1% |
|
|
| Top Three |
-1.2% |
0.3% |
2.5% |
3.5% |
1.5% |
2.5% |
3.9% |
5.1% |
3.3% |
2.7% |
2.0% |
2.1% |
2.5% |
2.9% |
0.9% |
2.3% |
2.1% |
| Bottom Six |
-1.5% |
0.1% |
1.8% |
3.8% |
2.7% |
1.9% |
2.8% |
2.8% |
2.1% |
2.3% |
2.1% |
1.2% |
2.3% |
2.8% |
1.3% |
1.8% |
2.1% |
APPENDIX 2
EXPENDITURE
| 2005-06 |
| Investment Priority |
Allocation £000s |
Actual £000s |
Under / (Over) Spend £000s |
2006-07 Allocation £000s |
2007-08 Allocation £000s |
3 Year Programme Tools £000s |
| C1: Bring More People Into Work (NWDA) |
290 |
295 |
5 |
4,008 |
4,327 |
8,630 |
| C2: Strengthen the Knowledge base (NWDA)
| 500 | 500
| — | 13,262
| 17,638 | 31,400
|
| C3: Build A More Entrepreneurial North (ONE)
| 330 | 331
| 1 | 4,745
| 4,924 | 10,000
|
| C4: Capture a larger Share of Global Trade (ONE) 2,400
| 2,349 | -51
| 1,847 | 1,523
| 5,719 |
| C5: Meet Employer Skills Needs (NWDA)
| 2,000 | 2,012
| 12 | 1,577
| 1,411 | 5,000
|
| C6-8: The Norths Connectivity (YF)
| 400 | 420
| 20 | 5,753
| 14,105 | 20,278
|
| C9: Create Truly Sustainable Communities (ONE)
| 330 | 350
| 20 | 2,239
| 1,392 | 3,981
|
| C10: Market The North To The World (YF)
| 2,250 | 2,248
| -2 | 3,617
| 2,835 | 8,700
|
| City Region Development Programmes
| 250 | 245
| -5 | 1,000
| 755 | 2,000
|
| Engagement and Communications
| 400 | 591
| 191 | 487
| 510 | 1,588
|
| Secretariat | 750
| 582 | -168
| 950 | 950
| 2,482 |
| Contingency | —
| — | —
| — | 223
| 223 |
| Total | 9,900
| 9,922 | 22
| 39,485 | 50,593
| 100,000 |
Key:
NWDA North West Development Agency.
ONE One NorthEast.
YF Yorkshire Forward.
NB: Totals may not add up due to rounding.
APPENDIX 3
GAF PAYMENTS MADE IN 2005-06 TO LAS
| Payee |
Amount £ |
Total £ |
Resource / Capital |
| Ashford Borough Council | 496,800.00
| | RC |
| Ashford Borough Council | 869,000.00
| | Cap |
| | 1,365,800.00
| |
| Aylesbury Vale District Council | 677,277.51
| | RC |
| Aylesbury Vale District Council | 286,337.50
| | Cap |
| | 963,615.01
| |
| Bedford Borough Council | 319,703.37
| | RC |
| | 319,703.37
| |
| Bedfordshire County Council | 285,000.00
| | RC |
| Bedfordshire County Council | 804,048.22
| | Cap |
| | 1,089,048.22
| |
| Borough Council of Wellingborough | 836,042.51
| | Cap |
| | 836,042.51
| |
| Braintree District Council | 8,992.00
| | Cap |
| | 8,992.00
| |
| Buckinghamshire County Council | 100,000.00
| | RC |
| Buckinghamshire County Council | 197,244.24
| | Cap |
| | 297,244.24
| |
| Cambridgeshire County Council | 813,869.22
| | RC |
| Cambridgeshire County Council | 13,897,128.36
| | Cap |
| | 14,710,997.58
| |
| Corby Borough Council | 197,080.36
| | Cap |
| | 197,080.36
| |
| Enfield London Borough | 968,176.00
| | Cap |
| | 968,176.00
| |
| Harlow District Council | 244,298.99
| | RC |
| Harlow District Council | 1,686,770.43
| | Cap |
| | 1,931,069.42
| |
| Huntingdonshire District Council | 1,547,408.00
| | Cap |
| | 1,547,408.00
| |
| Kent County Council | 141,798.74
| | RC |
| Kent County Council | 1,167,374.02
| | Cap |
| | 1,309,172.76
| |
| London Borough of Redbridge | 196,000.00
| | RC |
| London Borough of Redbridge | 427,000.00
| | Cap |
| | 623,000.00
| |
| London Borough of Waltham Forest | 52,518.96
| | RC |
| London Borough of Waltham Forest | 2,384,336.66
| | Cap |
| | 2,436,855.62
| |
| Milton Keynes Borough Council | 1,465,851.55
| | Cap |
| | 1,465,851.55
| |
| Northampton Borough Council | 179,104.00
| | RC |
| Northampton Borough Council | 4,333,050.76
| | Cap |
| | 4,512,154.76
| |
| Northamptonshire County Council | 1,267,648.00
| | RC |
| Northamptonshire County Council | 4,349,834.76
| | Cap |
| | 5,617,482.76
| |
| Peterborough City Council | 20,522.00
| | RC |
| Peterborough City Council | 1,406,090.21
| | Cap |
| | 20,522.00
| |
| South Bedfordshire District Council | 650,000.00
| | Cap |
| South Bedfordshire District Council | 100,000.00
| | RC |
| | 750,000.00
| |
| South Northamptonshire Council | 350,000.00
| | Cap |
| | 350,000.00
| |
| Stevenage Borough Council | 1,677,982.24
| | Cap |
| | 1,677,982.24
| |
Grand Total | |
44,404,288.61 | |
| Revenue | 4,894,540.79
| |
| Capital | 39,509,747.82
| |
GAF PAYMENTS MADE IN 2005-06 TO OTHER BODIES
| Payee |
£ |
Amount £ |
Resource /
Capital |
£ |
| West Northampton Urban Development Corporation
| | | RC |
70,000.00 |
| West Northampton Urban Development Corporation
| | 6,913,183.00 | Cap
| |
| 6,913,183.00 |
| | |
| Stragetic Rail Authority | |
| RC | 1,526,447.22
|
| 70,000.00 |
| | |
| SEEDA | | 1,423,978.31
| Cap | |
| 1,423,978.31 |
| | |
| Northampton Theatres Trust |
| 349,721.00 | Cap |
|
| 349,721.00 |
| | |
| Milton Keynes College | |
83,259.94 | Cap |
|
| 83,259.94 |
| | |
| Milton Keynes Community Foundation |
| 45,180.41 | Cap |
|
| 45,180.41 |
| | |
| Milton Keynes Economy and Learning Partnership
| | 25,000.00 | Cap
| |
| 25,000.00 |
| | |
| London Development Agency |
| 410,799.00 | Cap |
|
| 410,799.00 |
| | |
| Marston Vale Trust | | 943,539.00
| Cap | |
| 943,539.00 |
| | |
| Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland Strategic Health Authority
| | | RC |
100,000.00 |
| 100,000.00 |
| | |
| Environment Agency | |
| RC | 88,882.52 |
| 88,882.52 |
| | |
| Greater London Authority | |
| RC | 50,000.00 |
| 50,000.00 |
| | |
| Groundwork East London | |
499,999.82 | Cap |
|
| 499,999.82 |
| | |
| Groundwork Hertfordshire | |
676,500.00 | Cap |
|
| 676,500.00 |
| | |
| Catalyst Corby | | 56,759.98
| Cap | |
| 56,759.98 |
| | |
| British Waterways Board | |
127,605.25 | Cap |
|
| 127,605.25 |
| | |
| Bevan Ashford | | 3,141,700.00
| Cap | |
| 3,141,700.00 |
| | |
| Capital | 14,697,225.71
| Revenue | 1,835,329.74 |
| Grand Total | 16,532,555.45
| | |
|
