Select Committee on Communities and Local Government Committee Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the National Housing Federation

  The attached memorandum has been provided by the National Housing Federation. It relates to the specific circumstances encountered by one of its members, a large housing association, in managing a housing estate in South London.

MIXED TENURE MAJOR WORKS

  A good example of dealing with the challenge of a number of mixed tenure blocks happened on an estate we have.

  A major works project was planned to take place and consultation took place with the leaseholders. The works were going to be expensive because they included major structural repair. They also included renewal of the windows, installation of a new door entry system that a number of residents had requested plus general building repairs.

  We had a lot of complaints from a number of lessees complaining about the cost of the works. This was especially vociferous in the case of "buy to let" leaseholders.

  Tenants came back to us pleased to be getting new windows and a door entry system, which they felt were needed.

  Below is an example of four blocks on the estate which shows the differing action we took.

  Block A was all tenanted so we carried out all the planned works and the tenants were very pleased with this.

  Block B was where the residents intended to enfranchise as over 80% were leaseholders. Here on their request the only works we carried out were the important structural works.

  Block C was a mixed tenure block with 50% leaseholders and 50% tenants. Here two out of the three leaseholders were "buy to let" leaseholders and they did not want any works carried out. They instigated reports to question the structural works and the need to replace the windows. We did not waver from our view of the need to carry out the structural repairs but agreed only to overhaul and not replace their windows if they did not want it. They chose the overhaul option. We replaced the windows in our tenanted flats.

  Block D was a similar make up to Block C and initially agreed with the leaseholders in block C and objected to all the work. When they saw the appearance of Block A which had all the works carried out on it, they changed their mind and agreed to have the new windows installed. These leaseholders all lived in their flats.

  We offered all the leaseholders the option of spreading the cost of the works over four years with a small interest charge.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2007
Prepared 10 August 2007